Should Animal Testing Be Allowed

The use of animals in scientific research has hugely increased in the last few years. A research conducted by Dr. Hadwen Trust suggests that approximately 115 millions animals are used in scientific experimentation every year (qtd in “Fact and figures”). Animal testing, also known as animal vivisection, is a process before human clinical trials, where animals are used in experiments to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of drugs (Biology dictionary). Although some scientists argue that animal testing is necessary to ensure safety, animal testing is unreliable, dangerous and unnecessary.

Sammy, who has been trained to aid blind people, but he has not been adopted within a year. Of course, they are unknowledgeable to the fact he could help the indigent people because they do not take the time to determine his special gifts. Thus, the scientists decide to use him for research. The agonizing pain flows through his body as he lies on the table getting chemicals put through his tense veins. He wants to run, but the scientists have him strapped to the bed so tightly that he cannot move. As they run the chemicals through him, he cannot do anything but think of his life and extraordinary past owner he had before he got sent to the local dog shelter. Although researchers would have to find new innovations other than animal experimentation to make safe products for humans, the testing of animals should be banned.

Animals are used as “models” for human disease, biomedical research, behavioral research, agricultural research, product development, drug testing and science education. In Professor Elizabeth Fisher’s article, “Why We Should Accept Animal Testing” she explains how we should be for animal testing and start getting used to the idea considering we found mass breakthroughs while using animals. NEAVS is an association in which they are trying to stop research using animals and are trying to find an improved way than unjust and cruel use in experiments. Their article,”Animals and Research Testing” they explain all the reasons why it should not be considered an option. There are times animal testing is not so accurate and works on animals, but on

Everyone has probably worn or has owned something animal tested, whether they’ve known it or not. Animal testing has been around since the early ADs but was most commonly known for starting about 150 years ago with the rise of physiology as a science. As “Companies That Still Use Animal Testing” says, these testings have gone down a lot with new developments for these kind of testing but there are still many major companies such as L’oreal, Clorox, Covergirl, MAC, Pantene, Dove, Avon and hundreds of other companies you’ve probably used. These companies torture these animals and even kill them with their products just so there is yet another

Should animal testing still be necessary? This is a very hard decision, there are pros and cons on both sides of the argument, but i'm going with no. Animal testing should not be necessary and it isn't. hurting animals should be the same as hurting humans. I hope the people who disagree change your mind.

Testing on animals should not be allowed. One reason is because animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Another reason is because animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. A third reason is because alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. These are all reasons why people should not do testing on animals.

Humans have been using animals to do tests and researches for a long time, but nowadays these kind of testing are being questioned. There are many types of research such as pure research, which is used to genetics and developmental biology researches; and applied research which involves drug testing, cosmetic tests and toxicology tests. The applied research is the most questioned for its cruelty with the animals since there are lot of tests that make the animal suffer or even die. So the question is: should the animal test be allowed? Although some people are extremely against to animals testing, some of these test can save lives. Which is why people should questioned it, but not end it completely. In other words, animal testing has its advantages and problems.

“Never, never be afraid to do what is right especially if the well being of a person or animal is at stake (Martin Luther King Jr.).” Martin Luther King Jr. believed that people must stand up for animals who are being tortured or harmed in anyway. The phrase ‘animal testing’ refers to the procedures being performed on living animals for research of biology, diseases, environmental safety, cosmetics, drugs, and industrial products. Animal testing puts the lives of animals on the line for cosmetics and other unimportant inventions. There are many animal rights group such as PETA that fight to end animal testing all together. Animal testing must be prohibited because it is not the best way to test products, it wastes a lot of money, and many animals are harmed in the process.

In the year 2000 a total of over two million animals were used for testing in the United Kingdom. Around the world, animals are used to test products ranging from shampoo to new cancer drugs. This cruel act of animal experimentation should be illegal. The use of animals for testing is not only inhumane, but most animals being used aren’t genetically the same as humans, it is also expensive to do, therefore wasting government dollars.

What does Colgate, Band-Aid, Tylenol, Kleenex, L’Oreal, Gillette, Ziploc, and Ben & Jerry’s have in common? They all are companies that test on animals. Animal testing has been a routine process mainly in the cosmetic industry, among others, around the world since the time of the ancient Greeks. Not only is this practice inhumane, but it is also thought to be ineffective by many researchers and scientists. More than half of the tests that are performed on animals have different reactions on humans, and innocent animals are unnecessarily put through cruel treatment. Animals do not deserve to be used as subjects for research work or product testing.

As a society we have failed to notice, it’s everywhere. The animal testing footprint. Aeroguard, Chapstick, Michael Kors, Palmolive and Dettol: these common household brands all have the dark footprints of animal experimentation embedded into it.

Animal testing is taking living animals to “test new drugs to infecting with diseases, poisoning for toxicity testing, burning skin, causing brain damage, implanting electrodes into the brain, maiming, blinding, and other painful and invasive procedures”(“Harm and suffering”). Those in favour of animal testing believe that human beings and animals share similar illness, and thus animals can serve as valid models for studying human illness. They also contend that it can develop and find medical treatments to treat diseases. However, there are studies that reveal that the research based on animals are inaccurate, and the treatment of the animals at times are inhuman. In essence, animal testing should be banned because it is unethical to kill or harm animals for human’s own goods, will cause more harm than good, animal and human are different which the tests are not relevant to human and there are other techniques that can replace animal testing.

Mahatma Gandhi, preeminent leader of Indian independence movement, once said that “the greatness of nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” In the light of it, animals rights have been dealing for a long time in means of morality. It is not a surprise that animals are engaged many parts of human as animals have been live with human from the beginning. Beyond whether animal testing is right or wrong, animal testing should be used for specific purposes with regulations keeping the border of morality. Especially, animal testing for medication experiment have been benefiting human in numerous ways. For instance, researchers used animal testing during the process of inventing Polio vaccine, the important cure for an infamous disease that paralyzed or crippled many young adults in America in 1950s. Until the Polio vaccine was discovered, many people were afraid of the disease because of its high death rate. But the Polio vaccine, which was based on animal testing, brought such a huge rescue. Not only Polio but also many other diseases were based on animal testing and retrieved many people proving how testing the animals is more important to human life and success and those many successes of medication through animal testing demonstrates that animal testing on medication is beneficial to human.

The use of animals in research has created a diverse range of attitudes, as some individuals support the use of animals in research and others are against it. Sometimes people do not have enough background knowledge on this topic to be involved in a discussion of animal testing. Animal testing dates back to around 400 years ago, when one of the first famous researchers William Harvey was curious to discover how blood circulates around the body. The modern era of animal testing began around 150 years ago, although the conditions were quite different; there were no painkillers as the animals suffered a great deal (Understanding Animal Research 2013).

Whether animal experimentation is justified or not has been undecided for many decades. Many years back, the debate was carried out by animal rights groups which were led by the Cambridge University to get rid of its plan for a primate research in 2004. Since this debate, many supporters have become more confident in speaking out what they believe and getting their points across to people.