Should Animal Testing Be Useful?

There has been a lot of animal testing in the United States and thousands of animals already have been killed. In research and testing, animals are subjected to experiments that can include everything from testing new drugs, poisoning for toxicity testing, burning skin, causing brain damage, implanting electrodes into the brain, maiming, blinding, and other painful and invasive procedures. Animal testing should not be allowed to proceed because millions of animals are getting killed, the results aren't always right, and it is more expensive to test it on animals.

Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures, treatments, and major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, childhood leukemia, brain injuries, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics. Using animals as research subjects is appropriate because they are similar to human beings in many ways.

In discussion of animal rights, one controversial issue has been whether or not animals should be use for medical testing. On the one hand, some scientists argue that animal testing has contributed for many cures and treatments. On the other hand, animal rights activist contends that alternative methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Others even maintain that animal testing is an essential part in medical research. My own view is that animals should not be used in medical testing because is no longer necessary now there are methods that are safer and have better results than animals do.

Long term thinking and the invention of new technologies and cures as result of animal testing could possibly be more beneficial for the world as a whole, while short term thinking that views hurting animals for possibly no beneficial outcome would benefit the individual animals that are being tested

Experimentation of animals may be horrible. But if they do continue the experimentation of animals than that would have evermore excellent results. First, It means that they do not have to test the experiments on themselves. Second, it goes against the laws of science to test it on humans first. And third, It is easier to test and observe the reaction of a mouse or smaller creature than it is to see on a human. And so for these reasons they should continue the experimentation of animals before humans.

Everyone has probably worn or has owned something animal tested, whether they’ve known it or not. Animal testing has been around since the early ADs but was most commonly known for starting about 150 years ago with the rise of physiology as a science. As “Companies That Still Use Animal Testing” says, these testings have gone down a lot with new developments for these kind of testing but there are still many major companies such as L’oreal, Clorox, Covergirl, MAC, Pantene, Dove, Avon and hundreds of other companies you’ve probably used. These companies torture these animals and even kill them with their products just so there is yet another

Animal testing is good. If we didn’t test on animals then we wouldn’t know if our medicine worked or not. If we couldn’t test our medicine then we could give a human it and they could die.

Animal testing is cruel, against God, and can be avoided. Each year over 100 million animals die in United States laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animal testing dates all the way back to 258 B.C. The famous Greek doctor Galen (AD 129-200) studied animals. William Harvey used animals 400 years ago to discover how blood circulated in the body. Animal testing eventually made its way over to the United States in 1965.

Animal testing has been a controversial topic for decades. Researchers and scientists find animal testing essential for medical procedures and substances that they hope might be used to help people fight deadly diseases, but most times these experiments are often harmful and ineffective. Over time, scientists have had to choose whether to put ethics over science, ultimately determining the fate of numerous animals. Due to new advancements in science, animal testing can be reduced by using alternative measures. For this project, we set out to discover how effective the alternatives to animal testing are. We pose five specific questions that we hoped this research would help us to answer: (1) Are the failure rates of animal testing higher than the success rates? (2) What are the advantages of using alternative testing in opposed to animal testing? (3) How successful has the use of alternative testing been? (4) Does scientists prefer non-animal alternatives over animal testing? If so, why or why not? (5) Are alternatives more economic when compared to traditional methods of animal testing? These questions deserve to be examined because alternative testing are becoming more popular, and people should know how exactly they will benefit

Animal experimentation is both painful and unnecessary according to the resources in the literature review section. It is because of the fact that animal physiology, anatomy, and metabolism are not the same as the physiology, anatomy, and metabolism of people (“Problems with Animal Research,” n.d.). The things that animal experimentations cause seem to be spread diseases, defects, and deaths to humans. Therefore, it can easily be said that animal experimentation is the system that pharmaceutical industry created to earn money by ignoring the value of the human life (“The Pharmaceutical Racket,” n.d.). Therefore, animal experimentation should be stopped, and scientists should use the ways such as computer-based simulations, clinical trials,

The only law that has been created to regulate animal treatment is the Animal Welfare Act, according to InfoBase learning, “the law does not, however, ban the infliction of pain on animal subjects outright. Additionally, the Animal Welfare Act covers only dogs, cats, primates, rabbits, hamsters, and guinea pigs. It does not cover mice, rats, or birds.” While this law does set restrictions on animal testing, it does not cover all species used for research. Through this act, select animals are provided minimal protection, while the other animals are excluded. The animals that do receive the protection are still mistreated and abused, while the animals that are unaffected by the law are still being mistreated, to a greater degree. The animals deserve much better treatment and unfortunately have no control over whether or not they will be tested on. Because of the problems surrounding animal experimentation, limitations should be placed on animal testing because of ethical standards, unreliability, and existing alternative methods.

Animal testing has been around for generations and has both positive and negative effects. According to Hajar “Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history…” (Hajar). The number of animals being used and cost of research has grown exponentially. Yarri states that “Today, animal research is a multi-billion industry, an estimated 17 to 100 million animals in the U.S. alone are used in animal research, and debates about the proper relationship between humans and animals have moved into the scholarly realm” (Yarri). Those who consider the question of animal testing have always been aware that most Westerns contribute to the notion that there is a hierarchy of the animal kingdom with human beings on top and other animals being further down (Foëx). According to Aristotle, the ability of humans to reason and the fact that they have

Good morning. The topic of our debate is on whether or not it is ethical for animals to be tested on. Animal testing has led to the discovery of cures, treatments, and it ensures the safety of animals in human products. Animal testing provides benefits to animals as well because it allows humans to know what animals can and can't have. Animals are similar to humans and would react about the same as a human would, so it makes them a reliable testing source. A cure for tuberculosis, which infects two million people each year, uses this process. The test subject animal being guinea pigs. So far, UCLA, a university which uses animals as test subjects, has created a stronger vaccine against tuberculosis than the current one. According to Understanding

Animal testing is an ethical issue that bring up many questions, mainly on its morality. A product must always be tested before it is released to make sure it isn’t hazardous to society. Testing on animals is the most popular way of testing products or potential cures for diseases. Like you mentioned, these tests have helped many medical discoveries, however is it ethical to test on animals and plausibly cause harm to them? Many animals suffer or even die during these procedures. Is it right to overlook their lives to improve ours? Should it be allowed to test on animals even though we are causing unnecessary suffering on them? If it is not ethical to test on humans, then why is it acceptable to test on animals?

Whether animal experimentation is justified or not has been undecided for many decades. Many years back, the debate was carried out by animal rights groups which were led by the Cambridge University to get rid of its plan for a primate research in 2004. Since this debate, many supporters have become more confident in speaking out what they believe and getting their points across to people.