Should Animals Be Placed On Animal Testing?

Although some people believe animal testing is beneficial to humans, animals go through torture during the testing progress, and it is unethical. Marjie Lundstrom, a UC Davis researcher explains, “An incident at the University of California, three baby mice were found sealed alive in a plastic baggie and left unattended” (Animaltesting.com). This quote proves animals suffer during the testing progresses, and humans think the pain of the animals is okay. To clarify these baby mice were being abused and they were in an unethical situation. According to Human Society International, an undercover investigation site states, “animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other

Millions of animals are used for product testing and most of them do not come out alive. For proof, neavs.org says that every year in the United States over 25 million animals are used in biomedical experimentation, product and cosmetic testing, and science education. That tells us that millions of animals are used in biomedical experimentation, cosmetic testing, and science education. The animals are treated harshly and there is a 99% chance that they will die. Similarly, animalaid.org states that

Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures, treatments, and major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, childhood leukemia, brain injuries, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics. Using animals as research subjects is appropriate because they are similar to human beings in many ways.

Most of the animals use in research are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. Those animals like birds and mice are not protected because for the federal law, these animals are not in the animal category. The worst part of this is that those animals that are not protected are the ones most often used for testing. This animals are tortured in many ways and law does not do anything to protect them. In fact, even the animals that are protected by the AWA are harmed. They are exposed to a lot of harmful procedures. It have been cases were the same animals harm their selves due to all the stress they have to pass by. Imagine how much stress one need to be to be able to cause pain to itself.

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. There have been past occasions where drugs passed on animals weren’t even safe. There is no excuse for animal testing in today’s techy world, there are now many alternatives for animal testing that would put an end to the pain and suffering endured by these innocent animals during human testing.

Experimenting on animals need to be regarded as unacceptable by means of many due to the fact that it causes needless suffering to animals, the benefits of these experiments are yet to be proven, and any advantages humans do attain can be produced in different approaches than experimentation. The U.S. law permits animals to be poisoned, burned, shocked, starved, isolated, drowned, intelligence damaged, and addicted to drugs. There is no test that is prohibited and pain killers are not required, whether or not the test is painful or minor. Animal testing and experiments should be banned because of the excessive animal cruelty involved, the

“Animals undergoing testing can be subjected to torture and suffering” (Humanity, 2017, p. 1). Some animals may be cured of their ailments and diseases, but not all. In some cases, the animal dies do to the treatment. Humane treatment of the animals is a valid concern, so the use of them in experiments has been greatly regulated. “This has led to the 3Rs campaign, which advocates the search (1) for the replacement of animals with non-living models; (2) reduction in the use of animals; and (3) refinement of animal use products” (Hajar, 2011, p. 1). The Animal Welfare Act was signed to protect certain animals from cruel treatment, but the animals chosen for testing aren’t covered by this act. Many people believe that animal testing is unethical since animals are

The harm caused to animals from testing is beyond belief. Animals inhale fumes, are force-fed pesticides, are smeared with corrosive chemicals to their skin and eyes and with no voice to stop it. Those are just a few examples of what animals experience daily. In 1966 the Animal Welfare Act was put in place which was implemented to protect the animals, however loopholes have been discovered. According to People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), an organization which campaigns for animals rights; mice, rats, birds and cold-blooded animals are not covered in that act. Those types of animals make up 99% of that animals that are used as guinea pigs in experiments(Animal Testing 101). With this

Humanity has a lоng histоry оf exрerimentatiоn оn animals, esрecially in the medicаl and соsmetic рrоfessions. Many рeорle argue that humanity wоuld nоt be where it is tоday if it were nоt fоr its reliance оn animal exрerimentаtiоn. It is nigh untо imроssible tо deny that animal testing has ever been useful, althоugh the argument соuld certainly be made that such a methоd was nоt always necessary. Hоwever, with advancements in medical and scientific technolоgy, animal testing is nо lоnger a mоrally defensible рractice.

Today, animal testing is legal, however, it has restrictions. The AWA(Animal Welfare Act) is the only restriction put in place today with animal testing. This act, put in action in 1966, protects some warm-blooded animals such as dogs, cats, and primates. It protects these animals in ensuring their well-being is held. It especially states that the psychological well-being of primates should be upheld. However, this act does not protect small rodents, such as mice or rats, and cold-blooded animals. Farm animals used for agriculture use aren’t protected in this act as well.

The Animal Welfare Act is the only United States law that covers animals used as research. This law passed in 1966, regulates “the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers.” The USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) is in charge with enforcing the Animal Welfare Act. Under the AWA, it restricts the USDA from preventing animal testing within laboratories along with allowing, “any experiments regardless of the amount of pain or distress they might cause.” The majority of animals such as: mice, rats and birds that are used as experimentation are excluded in the AWA, leaving them the opportunity to suffer in the laboratories. The figure above shows the different types of species being tested on in only 2015. Note that mice, rats, and birds don’t fall into a separate category and are considered as “all other animals,” yet it is the third highest number being tested on. It is left to the laboratories responsibility to ensure that all animals are living in clean, healthy environments. However, with only being inspected once or twice a year, it’s very easy to find loopholes around caring for the

Animal testing has been a controversial topic for decades. Researchers and scientists find animal testing essential for medical procedures and substances that they hope might be used to help people fight deadly diseases, but most times these experiments are often harmful and ineffective. Over time, scientists have had to choose whether to put ethics over science, ultimately determining the fate of numerous animals. Due to new advancements in science, animal testing can be reduced by using alternative measures. For this project, we set out to discover how effective the alternatives to animal testing are. We pose five specific questions that we hoped this research would help us to answer: (1) Are the failure rates of animal testing higher than the success rates? (2) What are the advantages of using alternative testing in opposed to animal testing? (3) How successful has the use of alternative testing been? (4) Does scientists prefer non-animal alternatives over animal testing? If so, why or why not? (5) Are alternatives more economic when compared to traditional methods of animal testing? These questions deserve to be examined because alternative testing are becoming more popular, and people should know how exactly they will benefit

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

How would you feel if millions of humans were tested on? Millions of animals are testing on yearly to see if your everyday products are safe for humans. Animal testing happens on mice, rats, dogs, cats, and many other animals. By testing on the animals it causes the animals pain, suffering, distress, harm, and even death. Testing produces on animals needs to be stopped because it causes harm to animals, it's a bad way to see if the produce actually works, and it's unnecessary.

Good morning. The topic of our debate is on whether or not it is ethical for animals to be tested on. Animal testing has led to the discovery of cures, treatments, and it ensures the safety of animals in human products. Animal testing provides benefits to animals as well because it allows humans to know what animals can and can't have. Animals are similar to humans and would react about the same as a human would, so it makes them a reliable testing source. A cure for tuberculosis, which infects two million people each year, uses this process. The test subject animal being guinea pigs. So far, UCLA, a university which uses animals as test subjects, has created a stronger vaccine against tuberculosis than the current one. According to Understanding