Should Animals Be Tested On Chemical Lab Products?

Animal testing should not be used to make cosmetic products because animals are so different than humans that it often yields unreliable results.The website Peta2 states, “Less than 2 percent of human illnesses are ever seen in animals. Over 98 percent never affect the animal” (John Carpenter, ). This demonstrates that testing the products on animals is a useless and unreliable way to test the products. Companies test on animals to see the effects that it may be caused by that product, but they cannot truly see the effects that it will have on humans because, like the quote states, over 98 percent of the illnesses never affect that animals. Therefore the scientist that test on these animals will not even see the effects that it could have

If animal testing is the best method for testing products, humans would be a good method as well. These drugs, whether they are cosmetic, house supplies, or food additives, are initially made for the human species. If none of the animals tested are going to have these products for personal use, they should not have to suffer for them. An alternative method of experimentation has been recently studied, this study showed that human tissue and human cells can be tested on rather than animals. "Human tissue- and cell-based research methods, cadavers, sophisticated high-fidelity human patient simulators and computational models are more reliable, more precise, less expensive, and more humane than animal experiments" (Animal Rights). Not only can

After all, the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry prove that animal testing in drugs used by humans is unreliable. According to the FDA, 92% of drugs tested fail to meet the standards for human use. Animals do not share the same body system or physiological responses as humans, so why test these medication drugs on them? The National Anti-Vivisection Society states that it can be dangerous to apply animal-derived data to humans. Drugs that may be effective in animals may not be safe or effective in humans and vice versa. There are many examples where medications that worked on animals have proven to be dangerous to humans’ health. For example, the antibiotic, penicillin, was ineffective at treating infected rabbits and was toxic to guinea

The FDA should avoid testing drugs on animals to cutback on animal abuse. According to Animal Legal Defense Fund in the article Animal Testing and The Law it states, “The use of animals in laboratories often amounts to legally-sanctioned animal abuse.” This shows that animals that are being tested on are being hidden away from human eyes. This is because of the legal punishment that the animals are going through. For example, “An estimated 100 million animals are exploited in biomedical, aeronautic, automotive, military, agricultural, and cognitive research and in consumer product testing” (USDA). This means that millions of animals are being used unfairly to test many things including automotive industries, agricultural industries, cognitive research, and product testing. In conclusion, animals are being used in an unfair way that could potentially kill

There have been products found to be harmful against animals but life saving to humans and vice versa; these tests are inaccurate. The drugs tested on these creatures would and do act differently on that specific animal than to humans. Drug testing on rats to determine whether it is safe on humans is not accurate because rats are a totally different genotype than humans their reactions to the drugs are different (Hussein EM et al 2008). Also scientists have found a cure to cancer in mice but this cure is incompatible with humans (BUAV n.d). Furthermore, eye irritability tests that are conducted on rabbits are not precise because rabbits

Animal testing can be thought of as the necessary evil of today’s medical and pharmaceutical industries. While there are other alternatives, such as stem cell research and testing, those alternatives are just as rife with controversy and are usually much more expensive. It may be true that animal results are not always directly correlative with human data, but it gives researches a solid groundwork on which to proceed. Certain animals are used for certain types of medications and procedures precisely because the systems being tested are very similar to that of a human’s. It’s hard to argue with such amazing results; human health and lifespan have tremendously improved in just the last one hundred years, and much of that progress is due to the

What is animal research? Animal research also known as animal testing is very common and very necessary in testing the effects of products. Animal testing is very important to scientific advance. The observation and testing of animals can help scientist understand diseases and help create a cure for them. This testing is also used to determine is a product is safe, and the side effects of that product. How common is animal testing? In the United States, Canada and the Unites Kingdom. In these three places combined around 108.49 million animals were used in experiments in 2013, in America alone it was 101.04 million animals. Even though this number seems very high it has been going down in the past years. Companies still use animal testing in

Animals have been a key component in testing chemicals since the early 1920’s. That’s 95 years of torturing and killing innocent animals that dont have the voice to stand up for themselves. 100 million animals die each year due to experimenting and animal testing.

In the United States, we produce billions of cleaning and beauty products on a daily basis thanks to the advancement of machinery. Although we have machines and workers, these products need to be tested in order to be available to purchase in stores. Instead of using machines to test these products, most companies enforce testing their products on animals to ensure they are safe for humans. To some this not seem like a controversial topic, but for many this is a heartbreaking issue that is cruel to the lives of our animals. Animal testing is not ethical because it not only harms the lives of millions of animals, but also isn’t an accurate way to ensure the safety of our products.

Through the years, animal experimentation has played a key role in leading to breathtaking discoveries in medicine, products, and cosmetics. However, what many people tend to forget are the numbers of animal subjects that have suffered serious harm during the process of experimentation. Each day across the United States innocent animals are used as test subjects for products that have little to no relevance importance. Animal testing has had many negative issues that accompany it in society. Debating over the animal rights movement has raised many questions and concerns for years. There is an ongoing controversy regarding if companies should stop testing their products on animals. Although animal research has been the cause of many medical breakthroughs, it is considered morally and ethically right to put animals in these kinds of situations. One of the most asked questions in society is: should animal testing be illegal? When considering how truly reliable the results of animal test are, and the expense of testing will help bring new light to the problem. By simply passing a policy will not only address this issue but will help better products and medicine in the future.

Animals have been test subjects for many years for many products for safety issues before use on humans. These tests are unreliable they do not accurately portray how the material or drug interacts in the human body. Because of this, many products are put on the market and found to be very harmful to humans. Most of the drugs end up being discontinued or relabeled due to harmful side effect. The reason for some of the unreliability is animal test is the condition the animal is under, like stress. Stress on the animal can raise the heart rate, blood pressure and raise certain hormone levels, making the drug work in a

About 1.4 million animal die each year from animal testing.They are treated in harsh way and in poor conditions. Innocent animals are killed and if not they are tourchered. They should have the right to live freely. Although animal testing can be very useful, it harms lot of animals when there could be alternatives.

Good morning. The topic of our debate is on whether or not it is ethical for animals to be tested on. Animal testing has led to the discovery of cures, treatments, and it ensures the safety of animals in human products. Animal testing provides benefits to animals as well because it allows humans to know what animals can and can't have. Animals are similar to humans and would react about the same as a human would, so it makes them a reliable testing source. A cure for tuberculosis, which infects two million people each year, uses this process. The test subject animal being guinea pigs. So far, UCLA, a university which uses animals as test subjects, has created a stronger vaccine against tuberculosis than the current one. According to Understanding

Animal testing is an ethical issue that bring up many questions, mainly on its morality. A product must always be tested before it is released to make sure it isn’t hazardous to society. Testing on animals is the most popular way of testing products or potential cures for diseases. Like you mentioned, these tests have helped many medical discoveries, however is it ethical to test on animals and plausibly cause harm to them? Many animals suffer or even die during these procedures. Is it right to overlook their lives to improve ours? Should it be allowed to test on animals even though we are causing unnecessary suffering on them? If it is not ethical to test on humans, then why is it acceptable to test on animals?

Before releasing a drug, many studies and tests must be done to legalize it. One question that many people have is; how do you know if this drug will work? Well we test these drugs on animals, such as monkeys which have similar tissue to humans. This is one example of animal cruelty. Some other questions people ask are; what is our system for testing these drugs, and how could we change it?