security debates in recent memory. The FBI wanted to unlock one of the suspects phones, but were unable to do so because of security measures on the phone. The FBI wanted to brute force the password lock on the iPhone, but device would wipe itself after 10 failed attempts to unlock the iPhone. Thus, the FBI asked Apple to create an intentionally insecure iOS update, specifically for this iPhone, in order to bypass the security restrictions. Apple disagreed with the FBI, and tried to avoid helping the
Farook’s corporate owned iPhone (Brown, 2016, p. 8). However, when the FBI tried to unlock this iPhone, they discovered that the security system in place on it would erase everything on the phone if more than ten unsuccessful attempts to open it occur. As a result, the Department of Justice asked Apple to help them gain access to the phones data (Sydell & Wertheimer, 2016).
Farook’s corporate owned iPhone (Brown, 2016, p. 8). However, when the FBI tried to unlock this iPhone, they discovered that the security system in place on it would erase everything on the phone if more than ten unsuccessful attempts to open it occur. As a result, the Department of Justice asked Apple to help them gain access to the phone’s data (Sydell & Wertheimer, 2016).
from violating this rule? Not according to the FBI. In December 2015, the FBI recovered an iPhone (Apple Inc. cellphone product) at the crime scene of a mass shooting in San Bernardino, California. The iPhone was claim to belong to one of the terrorists involved in the attack. The FBI has contacted Apple requesting that the company disables the security feature on the iPhone they obtained at the crime scene. Apple declines the requests with the thought of its customer’s privacy in mind. Even though the
Apple is a worldwide technology company that designs, develops and sells consumer electronics, computer software, and online services. The four main products that Apple sells are the Mac computer, the iPhone, the iPad and the Apple watch which all contain the exclusive Apple software. They have 486 stores worldwide in 19 different countries, with online stores in 39 different countries. Since Apple has such a global presence, it is important that they uphold high ethical standards and socially
company Apple and the FBI was caused by tragic event, the FBI needed an iPhone unlocked from a know shooter of a mass shooting in California. Syed Farook worked as an environmental health specialist for the San Bernardino County in California. Farook went to a Christmas party that was hosted by his job, he later shot and killed 14 and injured 22. The probable motive to Farook rampage was told on social media belong to his wife Tashfeen Malik. Malik stated that she didn 't think a Muslim should be forced
absence, and that I may not be blogging regularly for a while yet, but Apple is fighting an order that create a security crippled version of iOS so the FBI might be able to access the phone owned by one of the San Bernardino shooters. Understanding what they are looking for and why is crucial to understanding why Apple is fighing it and deciding whether the company should. Tim Cook pulled few punches in his open letter on why Apple is fighting, and he makes a good case. But what is the FBI 's case?
technology life; therefore, our information usually is stored in Laptop, iPhone, iPad or can be shared on social network. That is why Apple created an un-crackable encryption software. I support that idea. My Facebook account used to be logged in by a hacker, and I could not log in into my account. Fortunately, I was able to regain that account through my email. Therefore, when I read Darrell Issa’s article “Forcing Apple to Hack That iPhone Sets a Dangerous Precedent” that was published in Wired Magazine
purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” (Independence Hall Association). In other words, those willing to give up their privacy for security, deserve neither. We the people, those who assemble this nation, and surely should not allow the government to invade our privacy or void our 4th amendment right. To further validate my point, George Orwell wrote a book called 1984, which presents the reader with the concept of “Big Brother”. In the book, Big Brother is introduced
were later killed in a shootout with the police. Their case didn’t end there. The FBI searched their house, in which they found much evidence to back that this was a terrorist plot. But a crucial piece of evidence which they found was Syed Farook’s iPhone 5C. In today’s society, phones contain more information about ourselves than even we can remember. Emails, messages, notes, bank details and much more can be found on our phone. So when the FBI was able to get hold of Farook’s phone, they were more