I believe that archaeologists should not remove artifacts from their original historic sites. People have been taking artifacts from their homes for many years, to put in museum or to be observed and experimented. But, with doing this, this comes with several disadvantages. This is because when doing this, is disrespects the historic aspect of it, and it could potentially destroy the artifact. Also, when taking the artifacts, it would make the historic site not special anymore. Imagine being in a tiny submarine. You’re almost 12,000 feet under the ocean, and you see nothing but darkness out of the little window. Then, suddenly, a massive burst of color makes you jump. As you get closer to the object, it appears to be a enormous, creepy, ghostlike sunken …show more content…
But, according to the text in article 3, “Over time, Peru's demands grew louder. Machu Picchu is an iconic place for the Peruvian people, and the idea of bones and artifacts from Peru being held in the U.S. took on a powerful symbolism.” This is a powerful quote because there is much symbolism to Peru’s artifact being held in the United States. Artifacts from a certain place should never be held somewhere far away from their original location. This disrespects the civilization or tragic event that the artifacts came from. Another reason why relocating artifacts is a bad idea is because this could potentially ruin the artifact. For example, if you take an artifact from the Titanic, put it in a exhibit in a museum, and have people breathe on it and touch it, that is going to ruin the artifact more than if you just let it be. You may think that you’re doing the artifact a favor, but research shows that the artifact will decay quicker if it’s in the museum being tested than on the bottom of the Atlantic. On the other hand, if all the artifacts were taken away from, for example, Machu Picchu, then the historic site isn’t special anymore. It would just be a pile
In a dystopian timeline the UT Vols have had two consecutive no win seasons and the town of Knoxville, TN is completely abandoned. Over time the city begins to feel the effect of weather, decay, and bioturbation. It isn’t until 500 years after evacuation that archaeologists return to the city to study the lives of the people who once lived there. During an excavation these professionals find two plastic bins filled with artifacts. Their goal now is to understand what the purpose and function of these artifacts are and what they can tell about the people who owned them. However, due to the nature of time passing, changes have occured in these items and others have been completely removed from the archaeological record. These occurrences will
In 1861 there was a war that turned north against south family against family. After their war the created monuments that represent the brave leaders that fought for what the believe in. Now there is controversy over if the monuments should be destroyed. This has created a titanic fight between tow sides one side is for the monuments being destroyed and the other side dose not want it to be destroyed. I believe that the monuments should not be destroyed. I believe they should not be destroyed because we need to remember our history. Finally is that it will not stop the violence.
Archeologists all over the world work towards not only discovering the tracks left behind by societies millions of years ago, but also make an effort to save those footprints for future generations. However, conservation and preservation of archaeological sites can prove to be as arduous as discovering them, or may be more. As a historical site is discovered, it becomes the responsibility of the government and everybody who has to play a role, to secure that site and to not let it deteriorate. Doing so is now also made part of law in many countries and it comes as no surprise when preservation of historical sites is the prime goal of numerous international organizations. Pompeii is one of the most popular historical sites that have been a point of concern for not only Italy’s government but also UN itself. In this paper we try develop an insight of barriers that restrict the development of restoration. Pompeii is an ancient Roman town near the modern Naples, which was first discovered in the 18th century, after it had been destroyed by a volcanic eruption, courtesy of the close standing Mount Vesuvius during the first century. This area and the closer one of Herculaneum was covered in about 20 feet of ash when it was discovered but much of the objects had been able to survive, specifically the ones below the city, as there had been no exposure to air or moisture. This destination is of great importance for the present world as it provides a quality insight into the ‘Pax
When considering excavation methods, the location of the site has to be taken into account, as many archaeological methodologies can cause long-term damage to the site. So considering conservation strategies and methods is crucial. This directly applies to New Kinord, as the
In examining the article “Around the Mall and Beyond”, by Michael Kernan, the author seems to make an argument illustrating the existence of artifacts, practically everywhere. In this article, I concur with his position that there are likely artifacts and remains wherever one might go. This is because we are not the first inhabitants of this land, as such, remains of humans, animals, tools etc. could likely be found in any area if searched for in-depth enough. The author makes a specific reference to the National Historic Preservation Act, which I particularly agree with. The author goes on to use several instances in history where history were discovered on sites which were being considered for or in the process of being converted into
Archaeologists are now able to come together with natives and learn about the past as a team, getting more insight into ceremonials, traditions, sacred ritueals, everyday workings, and lifestyles of native peoples. Respecting the grounds and artifacts of these indigenous people is respecting their heritage- our universal heritage. The unfolding of information allows archaeologists to gain perspective on the people and land before the white
To Native Americans, some of the objects were “created by their makers with the intent that the objects would disintegrate naturally,” so it is wrong to try to preserve those objects (67). Moreover, Native Americans think that if the objects were to be return to them, then it is not right for museums to tell them how to take care of the objects (72). A successful protest, for example, is the protest against exhibits that were being set up in celebration of Columbus Quincentenary. While Columbus is view as “hero” in many American’s eyes, he left Native Americans with a painful memory of enslaving and the bad treatment from the Colonists. In protesting to stop the celebration, protestors also hoped to re-educate the public about Columbus’ arrival in the Natives’ point of view (109-113). Due to these protests, many exhibitions were canceled. The exhibition, Seed of Change at the National Museum of Natural History tried to avoid the discussion of Columbus by focusing on things rather than people (117).
A few of many artifacts found at Fort Tombecbe are glass pieces, rock tools, beads, nails, Choctaw pottery, European ceramics, brick, charcoal, and led shots. Artifacts are anything made, used, or altered by humans that can be portable. The artifacts that have survived over the years give archeologists a visual aid of some resources used by cultures from the past. Although artifacts provide a visual aid of used resources, they do not provide archeologist a detailed story about life at Fort
I presume that mummies should be moved to a university where scientists can study what they reveal about the past. I also think that mummies should be kept in museums where people can learn more about history. After mummies are discovered, scientists should take them to their labs and study, testing the mummies to reveal what the human past might have been like. There are many diverse time periods and I think that scientists should be able to learn each time period to find out how things have changed overtime and what new discoveries they have made. Scientists should also look inside the bodies to find how they died or how their diet was, how they used to live, or where and how they migrated. When all the research the scientists can do on the
On July 24, 1911 an antiquity site located in the mountains surrounding Cusco, Peru, was rediscovered by explorer Hiram Bingham almost half a century after it was constructed. Since 1911 Machu Picchu has come into prominence as a tourist site because of its interesting history and its mysterious abandonment. Much of Machu Picchu has been restored since its discovery to give tourists a window into what it would have been like to live there at its prime. Machu Picchu was built by the great Inca civilization in 1450 and it is believed that it was used as an imperial retreat for the Inca Emperor. Historians now believe that the abrupt abandonment of Machu Picchu was a result of the Spanish conquest, but one of the reasons that it is so well
It is no longer known where the artifact was found its cultural relationship to other artifacts or even precisely how old the artifact is. All of these tiny details are extremely important in order to fully understand the archaeological record. Archaeologists therefore refrain from participating in any activities which may place a monetary value on any artifact in an effort to discourage the buying and selling of antiquities outside of archaeological
Art can be very valuable and irreplaceable. It can be sold for millions of dollars or the value can be priceless. Relics like Yamashita’s treasure and Da Vinci’s manuscripts are cultural items that have had an emotional and physical impact on many people, from devastating occurrences to moral repercussions. Famous artworks and relics have more then likely changed possession multiple times. Many people think that the world needs to be able to see this kind of stuff. It might even be too difficult to know or find out who the original owner of this item was.
Before watching this Machu Picchu video, I did have some prior knowledge about how the temples and fountains were made. They were made to collect water and let the people survive. If the city wasn't made a special way, it would have been destroyed over the years. After I watched the video, I learned that this abandoned city has a lot more to it than just temples, they had warfare/ The Inca were the known warriors, and they would do anything they could to protect the city. These fierce warriors, spread their empire across the country of Peru. The legend, Pachacuti, was the one who built Machu Picchu and he was also the first Inca emperor. Pachacuti was later mummified and is taken out at parades and parties to honor him. If I were to travel
Archaeologists believe that Machu Picchu was constructed as an estate for the Inca emperor, which can often be mistakenly referred to as the “Lost City of the Incas”. The site was built in a classical Inca style. By 1976, thirty percent of Machu Picchu had been restored and the restoration has continued. The site Machu Picchu was declared a UNESCO world heritage site and a Peruvian Historical Sanctuary in 1981.
Many archaeological sites and artifacts around the globe have fell victims to cultural heritage destruction. Whether it be from weather and climate change, tourism, the taking of artifacts, or degradation over time. Cultural heritage destruction can be defined as the destruction or elimination of historic sites, artifacts, or materials. Some people, whether it be government, an organization, or individuals, work to protect and fund the preservation and maintenance of important historic archeological remains. While other unfortunate sites are demolished, ransacked, or looted due to lack of protection. Machu Picchu, located in the Andes mountains in Peru, is considered one of the seven wonders of the world, as well as an archeological marvel built by the Inca people. However, this historical site has come under protection due to cultural heritage destruction from tourists and environmental degradation. Over the years, Machu Picchu has begun to erode due to an enormous amount of tourism and climate changes. Luckily the Peruvian government has begun to take action to protect one of the world's most well preserved mysteries and architecturally advanced sites of early modern history.