Should Athletes Be Paid Essay

College athletics are becoming more like the professional leagues except for one big issue, money. Student athletes bring in a vast amount of revenue for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) not to mention recognition and notoriety regarding the athlete’s university. However, the debate continues as to whether student athletes should or should not receive payment for playing college sports.

College athletes being paid to play, good or bad? This would be for the athletes that are going to be competing at the Division 1 level. According to NCAA’s official website a study was done and the stats showed that the highest percent of all athletes that would play D1 was 12.3% which was for lacrosse. The highest percent that the students would go play at the highest level which is Division 1 is .7% which is for volleyball. This is a very small amount of student athletes that get to go n to the next level of play and maybe to the professional league. So it would make sense that the athletes that are able to play at the highest level should be paid to do whatever sport it is that they are playing. People argue that the D1 athletes kinda get paid by the full ride scholarships that they receive. Well the athletes who play in the pros make money so why shouldn’t the players who play at the highest level be paid in the lower bracket of competition.

A current debate in the sports world is whether or not the athletes at the universities should or should not be paid. Many people think by giving the athletes full ride scholarships to a school is basically paying them since they get free room and bored. Other people think since the players are the ones winning all the games and making all the money for the university they should get some of the pay and not be treated like slaves. Paying college athletes is a huge topic debated by the experts in the sports industry, many say college athletes are being paid by their full ride scholarships, other people say that they are being treated unfair and making all the money for the universities in coaches. Other people say that they

Research Proposal: Why are College Athletes Not Paid? In 1906, President Theodore Roosevelt helped create the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Since then the NCAA has evolved into a billion dollar industry. The tremendous amount of revenue produced from college sports has led some to question whether student athletes should be considered amateurs any longer, and why are they not being paid be for their efforts. For my research, I will use library resources to provide information for my topic.

For the longest time, college athletes have poured their heart into their sport and worked very hard every day of every week. These athletes have proven themselves enough to able to show off their ability and talents at a university. These college athletes have a job and work too. Their job is to bring in money for the university they are playing for. In order for these athletes to play well enough to be considered able to bring in profit for the university, they must play a sport that they love to play and not a sport that they are forced to play. Over time, the main question that is on everyones mind is should students that play the sport they love for a university get paid simply because they are a college athlete that is displayed on television. My goal for this paper is to inform you of the reasons I believe they should get paid.

Throughout the existence of the NCAA and the realm of intercollegiate competition, one of the largest topics of debate has been the idea to compensate athletes based on athletic performance above any scholarships awarded. Mark Emmert, president of the National Collegiate Athletic Association, has previously said “We can never move to a place where we are paying players to play sports for us” (Garcia, 2010, para.9). This statement by Emmert has again sparked several conversations concerning the specifics of what defines amateurism and the exploitation of our young student athletes. The awarding of a salary to athletes is both heavily supported and strongly opposed by players, spectators, coaches, and collegiate

College athletes are hard-working students that contribute to the prosperity of their college through sports. Recently, a debate has risen over whether or not the college athletes should be paid for their hard work. While some believe student-athletes should be paid for their work in college athletics, this is not true. College athletes should not be paid, as they are already being paid indirectly. It is true that college athletes work hard and seem to deserve a pay for their performance.

Some critics would say that college athletes shouldn't get paid while in college due to that players will get distracted from their school work or won't go to class. Also college athletes shouldn’t be paid because they aren't professional. Being paid isn't the only thing athletes should really be caring about. For them it's a privilege for the students to play college sports and young kids and teens dream about having that opportunity to play when they are older. Athletes stress becomes a major reason in how they think in life, athletes need to concentrate on sports and what is on the field.

College athletes can be easily manipulated these days. Student athletes go long tedious days to stay academically eligible and also work to keep a high level of competitive play during their competitions. These athletes need to praised and rewarded for outstanding accomplishments they have achieved during their career. These athletes are not being rewarded but are also living on and off the campus without any money in their pockets. Since these athletes are living without an adequate supply of money, they are highly susceptible to grabbing money from booster clubs or any others who are very willing to help them in any way or form. The problem with this situation is that those athletes are going to get themselves and also their school’s athletic

Most of us should be aware of college athletics’ plight. Over the past few years student athletes have gotten huge recognition. There is a controversy whether these athletes should or should not be paid. Even though they make a substantial contribution to their school, these student athletes are not paid by the university. In some cases they are the reason for increasing the College’s reputation. In addition, these athletes increase the profits of the university, therefore these athletes should receive a part of the profits. First and foremost, universities use these athletes as core marketers, also such student athletes’ training sessions are comparable to a full-time job, and they worked hard to get there.

I always had some knowledge about my topic I have chosen. Growing up playing sports people would always talk about why athletes do not receive pay. It is an arguably subject to talk about, because some already feel like they receive pay through scholarship. This influenced me more when I grew over when I started playing college football. You get to realize that it is kind of hard without money in your pockets. My assumptions before researching this topic that their would be people who disagree about it because college athletes are not employees, and are going to school for free. The material I read never changed my opinion, but it gave me a more of a clear view to see why they will not pay college athletes.

In trying to decide what research topic I wanted to use, I took many ideas into thought. I decided that the one idea that interests me most is whether student athletes should be paid or not. This is very intriguing to me since my master’s program is sports management. In order to do this research there must be many ways to use research as well as ideas from other people. This project is a very big topic in today’s discussion amongst sport fans, college administrators, and student athletes themselves. Media has recently put more pressure on this topic as well with the Northwestern decision to unionize as well as pointing out an athletic director gaining an $18,000 supplement for a wrestler at their school winning a national

There are several up and downsides of being a student athlete but, the feeling of being apart of a team and doing something you love is the ultimate reward. According to the NCAA, “More than 460,000 NCAA student-athletes – more than ever before – compete in 24 sports every year” (“Student-Athletes”). Being a student athlete you learn how to be a part of a team as well as developing leadership qualities. Throughout your entire high school and or college athletic career, you’re creating everlasting friendships and memories with teammates and coaches. Being a student-athlete, your main priority is school but, with a busy and jammed packed schedule it can get a little overwhelming. With a busy schedule, student athletes have no choice other than to manage their time wisely. Along with learning time efficiency, participating in sport teaches you to be goal oriented. When you’re involved in sports, you push yourself physically and emotionally. You begin to set goals to better not only for yourself, but to better your team as well. Ultimately, there are several benefits of

Student athletes bring in huge revenue to their colleges, millions of dollars off of merchandise and and tickets sold out to fans. It is believed that athletes should get a share of this profit as they are the ones putting in the work and making their colleges or universities rich. Although this is logical, student athletes benefit from support that other college students don't receive. College athletes should not be paid as they receive financial aid that most college attendees don't receive including full paid scholarships, they tend to take these opportunities for granted and occasionally return to the colleges as they did not graduate.

Central to nearly every discussion about the progress and advancement that the United States has collectively enjoyed has been a question about the value and worth of human labor. Undoubtedly, one for the most resounding truths for the United States has been that the country has managed to find a dominant global status and domestic success due to the contributions of its citizens. Science, education, art, and all other industries have flourished due to the efforts of hundreds of people hailing from different backgrounds. Yet despite this historical precedent establishing the need for valuing the contributions of others, there continues to be a resounding national dismissal