Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.

In trying to decide what research topic I wanted to use, I took many ideas into thought. I decided that the one idea that interests me most is whether student athletes should be paid or not. This is very intriguing to me since my master’s program is sports management. In order to do this research there must be many ways to use research as well as ideas from other people. This project is a very big topic in today’s discussion amongst sport fans, college administrators, and student athletes themselves. Media has recently put more pressure on this topic as well with the Northwestern decision to unionize as well as pointing out an athletic director gaining an $18,000 supplement for a wrestler at their school winning a national

Should College Athletes Be Paid Outline Thesis Statement Should college athletes be paid to play sports in college? Main Ideas Should they be paid and why The reason why professional players are being paid What they should do if they do agree to pay them Topic sentence idea: should college athletes be paid and why Research concept: College Education Supporting Idea: They are not just playing for free the school is giving them a free college education. Connecting to next Concept: Another reason why they should not get paid is because they are still playing for a school Research Concept: They are still playing for a school Supporting Ideas: They are still for a school just like in High School.

College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.

Should College Athletes Get Paid? Sports Sports have been around for thousands of years. Through each generation people have been able to enjoy friendly competition amongst other people. Sports have created a platform for athletes to develop, coaches to manage, and entertainers to watch a show.

There has been a lot of controversy on whether colleges should be paying the paying their athletes. Brian Frederick, a board member of Sports Fan Coalition and an adjunct professor for Georgetown University’s Sport Industry Management Program, believes colleges have a broken system when it comes to athletes. Frederick’s contemptuous tone discredits sports fan, who believe college athletes already get paid enough with their education, by stating “If a student athlete is hurt or unsuccessful, the coaches and administrators suddenly discard the noble ideals of “education” and a player is left with nothing.” With the use of metaphors and similes, Frederick convinces sport fans to take action and make the calls in order to continue college athletics

I do not believe they should be paid and receive a good college education at the same time. ​Playing college sports is a privilege, not a job. Anyone who receives an athletic scholarship gets an opportunity to not only play the sport they love, but they get to receive a college education at a greatly reduced cost. Even though the hours make it seem like it is a job, it isn’t. At the division 1 level athletes spend an average of about 40 hours a week practicing sports(Do).

Should College Athletes Be Paid? Some people in the NCAA think that players should be payed money for playing a sport that they were offered by the college coach, and I’m here to tell you why I think it’s a bad idea and some sources from people who agree with me. I will also tell you the few good thing about this idea, but in my opinion there’s more bad than good coming out of this.

College athletics have become popular over time over the past few decades. Student athletes need to be determined, committed, and focused. The biggest trait needed by the athlete is dedication. The amount of dedication needed to be a student athlete could be overwhelming. Between classes and workouts could exhaust even the best athlete mentally and physically. Students athletes should be proud to get free education and play sports, but education should be valued more than sports . As an athlete, time management is the key to surviving. Athletes need a balance, maintaining at least 40 hours of practice a week, 30 hours a week of class time, and getting some sleep into their schedule too. Maintaining all of these aspects deserves some more credit, more than just a free education. The NCAA can afford to pay athletes, the NCAA makes about 12 billion every year. The NCAA money comes mostly from TV and marketing and makes up less than 10% of all college athletics money. The rest comes from school ticket sales and student fees from the school itself. The NCAA since 2006 profit have doubled since time has gone by and is still increasing from tournaments and school funding. Athletes play an active role in the promotions of these activities,

College athletes being paid to play, good or bad? This would be for the athletes that are going to be competing at the Division 1 level. According to NCAA’s official website a study was done and the stats showed that the highest percent of all athletes that would play D1 was 12.3% which was for lacrosse. The highest percent that the students would go play at the highest level which is Division 1 is .7% which is for volleyball. This is a very small amount of student athletes that get to go n to the next level of play and maybe to the professional league. So it would make sense that the athletes that are able to play at the highest level should be paid to do whatever sport it is that they are playing. People argue that the D1 athletes kinda get paid by the full ride scholarships that they receive. Well the athletes who play in the pros make money so why shouldn’t the players who play at the highest level be paid in the lower bracket of competition.

Zias Nichols Hammond ENG 1123 RKAK 18 June 2017 College Athletes Should Be Paid Thesis: College Athletes should be paid because billions of dollars are being made each year. I. NCAA players are considered amateurs despite helping earn more annually than some of America’s major sports. A. Why college athletes should be paid.

Kids grow up loving to play sports in their free time. They never get paid to play when they are at a young age. They do it for the love of the game and for the need for competition. This is the way that it is in college right now. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. They don’t get paid a cent. It has been a common debate if that is the right way to do it. Should it be that college athletes do not deserve to get paid for playing a sport? It should not be this way. College athletes certainly should get paid to play.

The debate over whether or not student athletes should be paid has sparked recently as student athletes feel they should be compensated for winning national championships and for their constant dedication to the team. As college sports are growing larger, players are arguing that they bring in extra money to their respective sports programs. The most revenue is brought in by the most successful football and basketball programs in the country such as Notre Dame and Alabama. Since these successful athletic programs generate so much money mainly due to the success of their players, the players argue that they should have a share in the earnings. Although students play an important part in revenue generated, the student athletes should not be paid

Waking up before the sunrise is a daily routine. Early morning film sessions, class, then practice, which dominates the day. There are few moments in between for food and socializing, but the life of a student athlete is anything but ordinary. Sleep, eat, practice and school are all an athlete knows, and with the pressures of campus life it becomes even more difficult. No time for much of anything, let alone getting a job. Like most students, these athletes need money, but do not have a spare moment to work. Without any source of income, athletes are put at a major disadvantage. Their full-time job is athletics, in addition to rigorous college-level courses. The possibility of becoming a professional athlete and making millions

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes