Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

These athletes are spending most of their time on the field, and should therefore be paid as such. In addition, college athletes should be reimbursed for spending most of their time focused on the sport, rather than their formal education. Statistically, top men’s basketball and football players spend 40 hours a week dedicated to sports. (Text 2)

After numerous scandals over the past several years of college athletes receiving improper benefits, the question has come up whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. College sports are a growing industry, and we have seen money destroy organizations, teams, and players in this industry.  The determination and motivation of college athletes supersedes professional athletes by their will to win; therefore, college athletes should not be paid.

One benefit of paying college athletes it provides a needed income for athletes. College athletes spend a total of 90 hours a week, with their sport and schooling. (Anderson, “Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid”). That is the equivalent of working two full time jobs and a side job on the weekends (Anderson, “Top Ten Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid”). So these student

Now when athletes are asked about how much time they actually practice it’s a different story. The 20 hours that are supposed to be are actually turn out to where “Division I football players averaged 43 hours a week. Baseball came in second with 42.1 hours and men’s basketball came in third with 39.2. These are in-season numbers” each major college sport 15 hours above the 20 hours so said by the NCAA (USA). College athletes follow the path of sports most of the time due to financial reasons. With a little pay from the efforts they put in most likely a majority of them would continue to stay in school. Since, college is more about being a student rather than an athlete a little pay wouldn't hurt to help keep a student and a athlete in their organization and their school. These athletes aren’t being payed for nearly a full-time job. They put their bodies on the line for little compensation and with their performances bring in more than five billion dollars every year. College basketball players being able to join the NBA as a freshman in college and college football players able to join the NFL just after their junior year, now whats honestly stopping them from doing so? Absolutely nothing is stopping them when you truly sit and think. Going to the NBA and NFL they're still gonna be playing competitive sports but now they actually get compensation for their

To begin with, college athletes should get paid because scholarship money are not enough. Scholarships do not always provide the athletes the right amount of money. The pay would be comparable to those who work a job because

Should college athletes get paid? My answer is no. There are many reasons why I say no and there are many reasons why college athletes should get paid and why they shouldn't. The College Industry is worth about 4 billion which is way over enough to pay college players. I think College athletes should not get paid because they are already being paid with an athletic scholarship, it will create greed and jealousy between players, the university that the athletes apply will pay for everything else.

College athletics have become popular over time over the past few decades. Student athletes need to be determined, committed, and focused. The biggest trait needed by the athlete is dedication. The amount of dedication needed to be a student athlete could be overwhelming. Between classes and workouts could exhaust even the best athlete mentally and physically. Students athletes should be proud to get free education and play sports, but education should be valued more than sports . As an athlete, time management is the key to surviving. Athletes need a balance, maintaining at least 40 hours of practice a week, 30 hours a week of class time, and getting some sleep into their schedule too. Maintaining all of these aspects deserves some more credit, more than just a free education. The NCAA can afford to pay athletes, the NCAA makes about 12 billion every year. The NCAA money comes mostly from TV and marketing and makes up less than 10% of all college athletics money. The rest comes from school ticket sales and student fees from the school itself. The NCAA since 2006 profit have doubled since time has gone by and is still increasing from tournaments and school funding. Athletes play an active role in the promotions of these activities,

While this time commitment is similar to that of a full time job, when students make the decision to pursue athletics at the collegiate level, they are signing on to be a student and an athlete.(Athletes Shouldn’t be Paid) NCAA does not count travel, mandatory meetings, medical check-ins, training-tape reviews and "voluntary" weight training in the hours, falsely reducing the official number of hours. The attention will lead to exposure of the NCAA's regulations and will risk serious action by proactive students.(Athletes aren’t employees. College athletes put in so many hours that they don't have enough time to get a job to make money for themselves(Zissou, Rebecca. “Fair play: should college athletes get paid?) Athletes get scholarships based on performance, coach or health of the athlete. NCAA limits the athletes to only 20 hours per week but many found the athletes at northwestern putting in 50 hours a week. (Athletes aren’t

The debate between if college athletes should get paid by the NCAA and colleges is a hot topic in the country. Everyone has an opinion on the topic but fact is that there’s a lot of positivity if college athletes are paid. Some of the positive things that come with college athletes receiving royalties are that they are financially stable, players stay in college longer, and limits corruption. College athletes should be paid. First Many players come from different backgrounds and have different financial situations.

Paying athletes would change the whole aspect of recruiting a great deal. Whatever school has the most money available would likely get the recruit. College athletes are not professionals, so they should not be treated accordingly. If the athletes were paid, it would turn the whole objective of a college upside down. Because of these reasons, college athletes should not be paid.

Playing college sports is a full time job and should be a paying one at that considering how much effort and hard work is put into the game. There has been an ongoing controversy about if college athletes should be paid or not. College athletes should be paid because they put a lot of heart into the game. This passion, that they put into the game, brings in a lot of money for other people yet they can’t see any of the money that they’re making for other people. Some of these athletes have a scholarship to play, but these scholarships don’t cover everything that is needed to survive and thrive in a college atmosphere. Some of these thoughts have surfaced about not paying college athletes because some people deem college sports an amateur playing field. This causes some athletes to take things into their own hands because they are not properly financially taken care of due to the money hungry thoughts of others. Surviving in college is an enormous problem, but it is not as extensive as having lifelong health problems due to playing in college.

For college athletes their sport is basically their job. When people become adults and they are looking for a job, usually they work a 40 hour work week. Athletes in college spend an average 43.3 hours on their sport which is more than a regular work week.

People say that college is a lot of work; just imagine having to commit time to a sport in college as well. College athletes should be rewarded for all the overtime they have to do to make up school work. College athletes have to spend a crazy amount of time being committed to a sport. They have to do team workouts, practice for so many hours per day, and then there are still games on top of all the hours put in. College athletes spend from thirty to forty hours per week on just sports alone. Even when the sport that the athlete

Right now in sports, there is a huge debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid. For years now college athletes have gone out and performed on national television, working hard to make it to the next level. They have given it there all, and not only that, the athletes bring in about $11 billion in annual revenue from college sports. Now days, sports is a business, and college sports are the same. Division 1 college sports provide a lot of income for the universities. Many athletes receive scholarships and a little more. While the prospect of receiving a free college education is something few would complain about, when the issue is more closely examined it becomes clear that it is not enough. Many people think that college athletes shouldn’t be paid, or already are by scholarships and benefits. College athletes should be paid for participating in college sports to help them financially, give them the money they played hard to earn, and to eliminate under the table payments.

The student athletes at most universities can be compared to employees, yet receiving no wages (Cooper 12). Along with time in the classroom and being a full-time student, athletes are expected to spend just as much time on their respective sport. In an article “Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid,” Dave Anderson explains that a college athlete spends just over 43 hours a week devoted to their sport. Those hours are spent with mandatory lifting workouts, conditioning workouts, watching film, position meetings, and practice. As I stated earlier, all this time that is spent on their sport is in addition to the time spent in the classroom with homework and studying. All of that added up well surpasses the time of the average work week at 40 hours and these athletes can quite honestly be looked at as workers for their universities.