Should College Athletes Be Paid? Essay

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

The debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. This billion dollar industry continues to grow in popularity and net worth, while they continue to see more and more money come in. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. It is time that the student-athletes start to see some of this income he or she may by helping bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association. There are many people who do not think this is in the best interest of the student-athletes or Universities, but that being said there are also many

Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. These rules have long been challenged, however no changes have been made by the NCAA. With universities grossing close to $200 million a year college athletics has turned into one of the top industries in the world. The NCAA is a governing body of college athletics, but without people questioning the NCAA and demanding changes to the monopoly that the NCAA is nothing will happen to the unfairness to college athletes like it is currently.

There is currently a major issue in today’s college athletics. Universities and the NCAA make billions of dollars while some student-athletes go hungry. There is a huge debate over whether or not student-athletes should be paid as employees of their respective colleges. Personally, I don’t believe players should receive full-time salaries, but Universities and the NCAA should be required to increase the value of the scholarships that they award to student-athletes. By requiring that colleges provide athletes with an additional $2,000 per semester as part of their scholarship you can greatly increase the well-being (welfare) of the students.

College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.

Over the past century college athletics have grown more popular than most professional sports. Most of its popularity is due to a large student body in addition to its Alumni, but nonetheless it has surpassed professional sports from its monetary success to its fan support. College athletics are also a very important commodity to Universities around the nation. Next to student's tuition, that's where the majority of the money comes from. No one is more responsible for bringing in that money more than the coach and his/her players. In this notion, one would think that such important people should be paid for a job well done. But this isn't the case. Over the years a question has emerged, should

The NCAA generates billions of dollars a year in revenue, through exploiting their athletes, and demeaning higher educations making them one of the most powerful and dangerous organizations in sports. The total annual revenue of the NCAA is $10.6 billion. very year, individually, every large Division I Men’s basketball school makes about $10.1 million dollars, and every large conference football school makes around $15.8 million per year (“NCAA College”). That revenue is split between a variety of things such as: ticket sales, tv and apparel contracts, and other merchandise sales (“NCAA College”). Perhaps the most profitable part of the NCAA is the television contracts. In 1961, Byers, then the commissioner of the NCAA, hired chief lobbyist

Over the course of the past few decades, college athletics have drastically increased in popularity throughout the United States. Television channels, news stations, and live-stream broadcasting websites have made viewing college sports more accessible. With the increased fan base, many people have debated over the issue of whether college athletes, specifically Division I recruits, should be compensated for their contribution to the university. Intercollegiate sports provide a crucial amount of the institution’s revenue, as well as attract prospective high school students to attend. Yet with this surplus of income, no athletes are compensated for their participation within an athletic program. Written within the National Collegiate Athletic Association rules and regulations, it states that athletes are not allowed to participate in any athletic competition if they have ever been paid, or promised to be paid, by their respective institution (NCAA). This sanction enforced by the NCAA has been a topic of debate for years as many avid sports fans provide key examples of the benefits that paying athletes would have on the school and the environment of college athletics as a whole. As a college athlete myself, I support the other side of the argument, in congruence with the NCAA, because I have first-hand experience with the responsibilities and time-management that a student-athlete at the college level requires.

Collegiate sports have grown throughout the years, making the National Collegiate Athletic Association, better known as the NCAA, a multimillion industry. Everyone within the industry gains their share of the revenue made, for example— the coaches and training staff— however, the college athletes, who are the main reason the NCAA makes all their revenue, do not gain anything. College athletes not receiving pay from the money they bring in is absurd and unfair, especially for them who sacrifice so much. This is a much debated topic, especially in the world of sports where any topic can escalate into a heated argument in a heartbeat from a disagreement. However, it is time for these athletes to receive the pay that the NCAA is pocketing from them; their sacrifice should no longer go unnoticed.

Athletes today are remarkably faster and stronger than ever before. There is a man named Haile Gebrselassie who ran a marathon in 2 hours. Mike Powell has a long jump record of 29 ft.These athletes are setting new records, creating high standards and making names for themselves. When it comes to college athletes, there is a lot of thought about whether they should get paid for all of their hard work and revenue they bring into their schools. These athletes are making names for themselves and for their schools, but they aren’t professionals. College sports are the pathway to possibly becoming a professional and making a career out of athletics. Although they aren’t professionals, they work hard every day and don’t have time to make any kind of other money. Should these athletes get paid on top of scholarships and other benefits for playing their sport?

Paying collegiate athletes is a very controversial topic that has been talked about since the creation of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in 1910. People believe that the rules that are in place now for collegiate athletes should remain the same, which classifies college athletes as amateurs, banning them from earning any type of compensation for their athletic ability. Other people think that college athletes should be paid for many reasons, including their dedication, risk of injury, competitive unbalance, and because of the profits, the NCAA makes from athletic events. Student-athletes in college do not get the same opportunities to do certain things as people that are not in any athletic events. Most college students

Imagine getting up at 6 a.m. for a morning working, going to class from about 8 a.m. to 1 p.m., having practice from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m., and then going to study tables for about two hours after practice. This is just a typical day in the life of a college athlete. During the seasons they are putting in upwards of 12 hours a day into their school work and sport, and have only a reduced tuition and the pride of representing their university to show for it. College athletes are working full time jobs and providing universities with billions of dollars, its time that these athletes should have the opportunities they deserve. Whether that is to either go directly in professional sports, or be paid by the NCAA. This topic is often brought up in the world of college sports and is continuing to pick up steam as college athletics gain popularity. While these athletes do sign letters of intents stating that they are still amateur athletes and must remain amateurs throughout their years of competing in college, that it goes against our American belief that allows everybody a chance to pursue their dreams. The system in place now requires these young athlete to sacrifice a year of their professional careers to go to college and without any intentions of graduating with a degree.

The corner kick is lobbed into the group of players strategically standing in front of the goal. Each player fights to get to the ball as it reaches closer. The ball is headed straight past the goalie’s hands and into the goal. The fans filled with students, alumni, and aspiring children stand up and cheer for UCLA as they win the championship game. When I was younger, my dream was to get a full ride scholarship to UCLA for soccer. I didn’t know much about college, but I did know that it was expensive. I didn’t want my parents to worry about paying for it and I wanted to be able to do the thing that I loved. That was it, no more and no less. So what happened to that dream? Some student athletes, specifically football and

Emil Zatopek, a Czechoslovakian long-distance runner once said, “An athlete cannot run with money in his pockets. He must run with hope in his heart and dreams in his head.” This quote speaks more in a short statement than I can in 4 minutes. However, these athletes receive more in a scholarship and experience than they ever can in a salary.

In recent discussions of college sports, many are debating whether college athletes should be paid or not. Many athletes and college coaches are fighting for pay. The athletes most coaches and sports broadcasters intend to pay our division one football and basketball players. However, paying athletes of only football and basketball may seem unfair to other college athletes of different sports. College football and basketball bring the most money for a college or university, which is why many want to reward the athletes for bringing so much publicity and money to their college. The discussion of how to pay the athletes is all over the place, with many different suggestions on how to come up with the money. For example some want salary pay,