Should College Athletes Be Paid? Essay

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

The debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. This billion dollar industry continues to grow in popularity and net worth, while they continue to see more and more money come in. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. It is time that the student-athletes start to see some of this income he or she may by helping bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association. There are many people who do not think this is in the best interest of the student-athletes or Universities, but that being said there are also many

College athletics are becoming more like the professional leagues except for one big issue, money. Student athletes bring in a vast amount of revenue for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) not to mention recognition and notoriety regarding the athlete’s university. However, the debate continues as to whether student athletes should or should not receive payment for playing college sports.

Many can argue that college student athletes should be paid money for anything involving them. I'm here to tell you why i believe paying college athletes is the right thing to do. Universities have long benefited from student athletes, all whilst the only compensation those athletes got a full scholarship, and some only receive partial.

Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. These rules have long been challenged, however no changes have been made by the NCAA. With universities grossing close to $200 million a year college athletics has turned into one of the top industries in the world. The NCAA is a governing body of college athletics, but without people questioning the NCAA and demanding changes to the monopoly that the NCAA is nothing will happen to the unfairness to college athletes like it is currently.

A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for

There is currently a major issue in today’s college athletics. Universities and the NCAA make billions of dollars while some student-athletes go hungry. There is a huge debate over whether or not student-athletes should be paid as employees of their respective colleges. Personally, I don’t believe players should receive full-time salaries, but Universities and the NCAA should be required to increase the value of the scholarships that they award to student-athletes. By requiring that colleges provide athletes with an additional $2,000 per semester as part of their scholarship you can greatly increase the well-being (welfare) of the students.

Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?

Paying college athletes is a hot topic between members of the NCAA. With all the money that college sports brings in, some people say that these athletes should get a portion of the money. I do not believe that college athletes should be paid. They already have scholarships that pay for their schooling, and giving these athletes money would only cause them to get into more problems away from their sport.

Athletes today are remarkably faster and stronger than ever before. There is a man named Haile Gebrselassie who ran a marathon in 2 hours. Mike Powell has a long jump record of 29 ft.These athletes are setting new records, creating high standards and making names for themselves. When it comes to college athletes, there is a lot of thought about whether they should get paid for all of their hard work and revenue they bring into their schools. These athletes are making names for themselves and for their schools, but they aren’t professionals. College sports are the pathway to possibly becoming a professional and making a career out of athletics. Although they aren’t professionals, they work hard every day and don’t have time to make any kind of other money. Should these athletes get paid on top of scholarships and other benefits for playing their sport?

Making money for someone else by using your labor without being compensated is the definition of slavery. Slavery was supposed to have been abolished over a 100 years ago, but would you be surprised if I told you that a form a slavery was still going on in 2015? Yes it is, in the form of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Around the country college athletes are generating billions of dollars for the NCAA without being paid a dime. This essay is intended for the people who believe college athletes shouldn’t be paid.

There will be college athletes to get paid. The NCAA has voted on the choice to let sixty- five teams from big power conferences, the ACC, Pac 12, Big 10, and SEC, including Notre Dame, would be able to make their own decisions on paying their athletes. “If you’re an athlete, going for zero to three-thousand five hundred dollars is in a lot better,” said Andy Schwarz, an economist who has done work for the plaintiffs in the Ed O’Bannon case. “But, it still misses the point entirely” (Schwarz). Athletes will start to be guaranteed the benefits that they deserve while being paid by these “Top five” divisions and will be able to pay for things like families of the athletes, more money in athletic health care coverage, and to pay for post season

The topic about to pay or not to pay college athletes has been debated for quite a while now, but what many people don't realize that not every college athlete receives a full ride for college. On average, college athletes are given only $14,000 in scholarships, the only problem is most colleges cost over $20,000 per year. On the academic side of things, athletes should have to maintain a certain GPA to earn their payment from athletics. If athletes were given the option to receive compensation for participating in sports, this argument would finally be over. Many athletes go to college for one reason, sports.

In my previous essay, I chose to address one of the biggest debates in collegiate sports; should college athletes be paid. For decades now school administers, alumni, boosters, and student athletes have been torn between the two sides, and I, for one, am in agreement with the idea of student athletes be compensated financially for all their time and dedication to their respectable sport. As you can imagine, there are many who oppose the idea, but as I stated in my previous essay there are great benefits for allowing student-athletes to be compensated. However, this is easier said than done. Deriving to a solution that fairly compensates all student athletes on every level of competition is no small feat, and will possibly take a few years of deliberation before actually being implemented. In this essay, I will make attempt in providing solutions on how student athlete can be compensated for their hard work. My proposal will include what actions need to be done first, and by whom could assist in the issue. Along with my resolutions, I will provide financial statistics to give support to my proposal and the realness of how compensating college athletes can actually be made possible.

One school of thought currently cycling throughout media circles is the definition and compensation of college student-athletes. Some colleges and universities provide student-athletes with complete or partially-paid tuition expenses, lodging, books, and other educational incidentals while the athlete plays sports at their institution. Many advocates for fair market compensation for college athletes argue that some Division 1 athletes “labor under very strict or arduous conditions, so they really are laborers in terms of the physical demands on them while they are also trying to go to school” (Cooper 12), but college athletes are primarily students and athletes second. The opportunity to play sports does not exist without the establishment of the institution as an educational foundation first that develops mascots and athletic programs after the fact. College athletes should not be additionally compensated beyond traditional athletic scholarships because college athletes are primarily students who also have the opportunity to play sports while receiving an advanced education.