Should Companies Bear The Corporate Social Responsibility Of Employment Practices Among The Multinational Corporations?

1299 WordsMar 31, 20176 Pages
Should companies bear the corporate social responsibility of employment practices among the multinational corporations? This essay will illustrate why the specific ethical issue is essential, analyse further ethical question, define current comprehension of ethical issues, analyse the act of ethical utilitarianism by forecasting three important positive and three important negative consequences, and should companies bear the corporate social responsibility or not. Firstly, the corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been argued since the 1950s and the definition of CSR is continually changing. It also demonstrated as resolving social issues (Wood and Logsdon 2002). Because CSR is focusing on estimating the social economy, which depends…show more content…
Donaldson (1989, cited in Secchi, 2007:359) found that general ethics, when manager have great idea find out invisible profits and unlimited resource. Because without concentrating on the practical managerial approach, a few of negative consequences happen like protests, boycotts, and strikes. The third theory is which elements will affect employee 's commitment. Towers Perrin (2009) figured out that community advancement is the third most significant driver of employee engagement. For example, in America, company 's competence is the second most considered factor, and the following factor is the company 's duty for workers in general. In conclusion, CSR theories such as utilitarian, managerial and relational approaches are commonly using. Thirdly, in the global world, as a result of multinational employment, there are a plenty of CSR issues that are even much complex and difficult that before. One of the issues is extra- legal which is voluntary, not compulsory. Because of the voluntary, sometimes big companies do not follow the rule of CSR. For example, the famous brand like Nike faces tremendous pressure in order to be liable to employees. They arouse acrimony through the indirect business strategies such as providing low-cost conditions to labours. Hence, to be capable achieving liable, companies need to be responsible. In
Open Document