Should Creativity Be Taught In Schools

Are we underestimating the importance of creativity? Many times children are not encouraged at home to be creative, either because their parents restrict their ideas, fill their decisions with pessimism, or simply do not pay attention to this matter. However, creativity is a skill that makes the human being flexible and resourceful as well as helping them see problems differently and identify solutions more easily. Many times education will directly contradict creativity. It destroys the innovation of ideas, and stifles the imagination, while claiming it is “teaching.” Sometimes entering a classroom becomes the closest thing to entering a time machine since our teaching methods differ very little from those of ancient Rome over 2000 years ago. In Ted Talk “How Schools Kills Creativity” by Ken Robinson and the article “Let Teenagers Try Adulthood” by Leon Botstein, two different opinions about the current educational system are presented. While Robinson believes that the schooling system should work to promote creativity, Botstein says that the concept of a high and middle school is useless and should be abolished. However they both agree on reform. As a parent, I have always been concerned about my daughters’ education, and have always believed, like Robinson and Botstein, that our educational system needs a change.

Creativity drives today’s world, with new technology arriving daily and science conducting itself further. We need creative and imaginative people in today’s atmosphere to bring the world to the next step forward. “Standardized college admissions tests assess only analytical skills, as well as the knowledge base on which they act, and completely ignore creative and practical skills (Sternberg 7)”. Without creative people in this world, where do you think we would be? Not very far. We need practical skills to go throughout everyday life. The standardized tests don’t test for that knowledge base, they test how much short term memory a

Sir Ken Robinson makes an entertaining and profoundly moving case for creating an education system that nurtures rather than undermines creativity. I fully agree with everything Sir Ken Robinson discusses in his speech. The importance of creativity, originality, and the arts have been deemed nonessential in the public school system. The emphasis placed on math, the sciences, and test scores have stifled many children from discovering and flourishing at their talents. If children are not exposed to the arts and the ingenuity needed to think for themselves how will they have the ability to produce an original story, even if they are taught writing and grammar.

Creativity is the ability to think divergently; this means that the person has the ability to look beyond the traditional use of something. There are ways to measure how well a person can do this: one example could be to give them an ordinary object, a paper clip, along with 60 seconds to come up with all the different purposes of that object. It is also the potential to act freely outside of a set way to do something. This potential includes the capacity to regard the world this way has great importance– it can provide a new and unique outlook on problems like health care, peace in Afghanistan, and how to save the Gulf of Mexico. However, the number of people with this ability is rapidly declining, so a solution is needed now. Since teaching the knowledge along with preparing students for their future careers and lives is the purpose of school, it would be a favorable idea to form a class to help cultivate this ability in students.

The beauty of creativity is that it is abstract, yet ubiquitous: in art, music or how one decides to compose an essay. However, creativity has recently been declining among the human population. According to an article, named, “The Creativity Crisis,” by Newsweek.com in July 2010, authors, Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman, state, “the Torrance Test … indicates that the public’s “creativity quotient” has steadily crept downward since 1990” (Prompt 1). Bronson and Merryman report that the test, which evaluates one’s creativity, had been dispensed to myriads of people across the globe, and have concluded that creativity has been slowly diminishing. Kyung Hee Kim, professor at the College of William and Mary, also comments that this is most prevalent and grave among students from kindergarten through sixth grade (Prompt 1). Consequently, society, or in this case, the world fears that current students and future generations will not be nourished with the creativity required to thrive as individuals, affecting the world as a whole. Ultimately, this poses the question whether a creative thinking class, which solely focuses on the education of creativity, should be taught in the school. This school should impose a creative thinking class, due to the fact creativity is a vital element for the future and is the solution to the creative crisis.

In a society where everything is constantly shifting and changing, it is essential for education to move away from teaching facts and figures to educating to inspire curiosity and creativity. The need for creativity in the classroom matters more than ever in our society. "Creativity is no longer seen as just being for artists and musicians .It's a crucial skill for everybody to master. "the following three articles were elaborated critique Department thinking, creativity and observation of contact,

Creativity is all about the 21st century skills and the future students. One form of creativity they will use is brainstorming. It includes elaborating, analyzing refining, and evaluating ideas to improve and maximize creative efforts (Syrett, 2002). Creativity involves originality, and working with peers to come up with ideas. It will allow you to fail and work on what went wrong and recreate it. They will have the tools that are needed to be creative. Creativity is an important aspect for every student to

A smart man said “Creativity is as important as literacy and we should treat it with the same standing.” (Ken Robinson-“Do schools kill creativity?”). There are multiple studies on how creativity helps improve a student’s mind. Project based learning is a huge creative booster for students. A math teacher from California uses projects to do math instead of using the text book. From doing this, she’s had more students pass her class then from when she was teaching straight from the text books. Instead of having standardized tests, using more creative techniques for students to enjoy the learning they’ve done and for them to show the higher officials what the students are learning. Creativity is the process of turning real world problems into an understanding by extending the minds cognitive processes. In Alabama, kindergartners are studying different ways to be creative.

In his video, “RSA ANIMATE: Changing Education Paradigms,” and his lecture, “Do Schools Kill Creativity” he discuses the need for a Paradigm shift from standardization teaching to divergent thinking (Robinson, 2007). Sir Ken Robinson explains how divergent thinking is an essential capacity for creativity, and with this paradigm shift, students can create original ideas, and can metaphorically see a bigger picture when learning. Ken Robinson discussed how everyone learns differently, and some students may learn better if they are able to tap into their creativity, and possibly use different

In his speech, "Do Schools Kill Creativity?", Ken Robinson (Robinson, 2006) discusses individual's creativity and the role of education in this field. Robinson argues that the major aim of teaching in school is to prepare pupils for their careers. He continues to suggest that "we are running education systems where mistakes are the worst thing you can do". (Robinson, 2006, p.7). He also adds that "we are educating people out of their creative capacities". His speech raises questions: "what is creativity?", "do schools kill creativity?" and can creativity be learned?

Why do people need creativity when they are in school? Well it is the quality to come up with good ideas, have imagination and others.Core knowledge creativity are straightforward, expect to know they answer. We could say cheating but you have to have really good skills to cheat perfectly. In the documentary “Education” by Morgan Spurlock, In the chatterschool in new york or core knowledge school they only creativity the class has when someone have the right answer the clapy, snap finger or something else.But skill based measure to think critically for anything or just use your brain for something more meaningful.In the article “ we should cherish our children’s freedon to think”(ho,113), Ho supports one more detail on creative geography. Instead of memorizing the names of all main cities in the world, his son only drafted the map which demonstrates the route- including the names of the streets, and buildings- from his house to school, he was using his imagination meaning skill based

When individuals ask about creativity, typically they have pre conceived notion of what is creativity. Studies from Business insider claims that school are trying to limit creativity by forcing classes that are little to no interest to students. Those who ponder the idea about what is truly creative are individuals who can be reason with. The art of creativity is one's own perspective; what one accepts as ludicrous other might believe to be brilliant. A ted talk by Sir Ken Robinson's proven this statement by using a child who fidgets a lot as an example of how most saw her as ill, but actually she's a talented dancer who later on became a prodigy in ballet. So, if schools took away her creativity, then she wouldn’t have reached her full potential.

In “Do School’s Kill Creativity?” published on Ted.com on February 2016, speaker Ken Robinson questions the effectiveness of our education system to facilitate creativity. To support his position, first, Robinson explains how creative and talented every child is, and that the education system is “educating people out of that creativity”. Next, he explains how the world’s education systems place all the emphasis on subjects deemed as useful for employment and academic abilities; consequently, talented, and creative individuals believe they are not due to the schools not valuing or stigmatizing their talents. Finally, he speaks of intelligence, how diverse, dynamic, and distinct it is. Robinson ends with a statement that educators need to recognize children’s

Creativity is undervalued in many ways in education today. According to Lisa Phillips who is an author, blog journalist, arts and leadership educator, speaker and business owner, “there is a significant gap between what children are told is important for their future career success and what business leaders actually want from the emerging workforce,” which is creativity. She proposes the argument of disconnection between the demand of the artistic individual and the undervaluing of creativity in education and states that if we focus more on setting up and nurturing creative individuality in education, we produce more efficient workers and effective thinkers for the workforce (Phillips, par. 12). “If ever there was a time when creativity was necessary for the survival and growth of any organization, it is now...” – Warren Bennis, Distinguished Professor of

Creative thinking is what controls our today’s imaginative economy and industrial advancements in our nation and all of the damaging issues. Our society is in need of creativity and people who need to be informed of how important it is to have creativity. It is important to bring creativity into school classrooms, to apply them and teach them because our economy is dependent on new ideas, new thoughts, and new creations. The latest lack in creativity can be solved in several steps. The authors, Bronson and Merryman, state our students (kindergarten to 6th grade) are declining and it is most serious right now, along with the “potential consequences that will come along with this impact.” This drop in “creativity quotient” is highly crucial to our economy and nation’s future. I would have to argue to bring back creativity in classrooms due to “creativity quotient steadily creeping down.” Teaching creativity in classrooms could help bring up this huge decrease and eventually start creating new, original student ideas.