Should Division One Athletes Be Paid Essay

In trying to decide what research topic I wanted to use, I took many ideas into thought. I decided that the one idea that interests me most is whether student athletes should be paid or not. This is very intriguing to me since my master’s program is sports management. In order to do this research there must be many ways to use research as well as ideas from other people. This project is a very big topic in today’s discussion amongst sport fans, college administrators, and student athletes themselves. Media has recently put more pressure on this topic as well with the Northwestern decision to unionize as well as pointing out an athletic director gaining an $18,000 supplement for a wrestler at their school winning a national

Most people don’t know that college athletes are already getting paid in different ways than just direct money. "A student athlete at a major conference school on a full scholarship is likely receiving a package of education, room, board, and coaching/training worth between $50,000 and $125,000 per year depending on their sport and whether they attend public or private university"(Dorfman). These athletes get training and coaching for free that professionals pay $2,000-$3,000 per week for. They also receive free schooling if they received scholarships from the school. They can also have free room which means the athletes don’t have to pay for their houses. The average college student pays $20,000 in tuition that these athletes get

College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.

College athletics have been incredibly profitable businesses for many years. With the advent of televised sporting events, the profit margin has increased exponentially. The Texas Longhorns’ football program alone grosses 104 million dollars annually (forbes.com). So, where is all that money going? Most of it goes right back to the school. The athletes who practice for endless hours and devote their lives to the sports get nothing but the satisfaction of winning. So, should Division One college athletes be paid? Division One athletes should be paid because they generate a significant amount of revenue for the school.

Only 2% are drafted into the NFL for instance, while the other 98% are getting a $200,000 education for free. There are eighty scholarship players on each of the 112 Division 1-A teams. This costs a university $16,000,000 to pay for an entire roster over four years (1 “College Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid”). With all of that money being thrown around, it would be difficult for a college to determine which athlete gets paid how much, and if one sport deserves to get paid more than another.

A current debate in the sports world is whether or not the athletes at the universities should or should not be paid. Many people think by giving the athletes full ride scholarships to a school is basically paying them since they get free room and bored. Other people think since the players are the ones winning all the games and making all the money for the university they should get some of the pay and not be treated like slaves. Paying college athletes is a huge topic debated by the experts in the sports industry, many say college athletes are being paid by their full ride scholarships, other people say that they are being treated unfair and making all the money for the universities in coaches. Other people say that they

This paper debates whether Division 1 athletes should be paid or not. I explain the situation to the readers that do not have much background knowledge of the topic. I go on to say that Division 1 players should be paid because they do not have much money to buy necessities. The NCAA does not allow players to get jobs due to the workload required for their particular sport. The athletes also cannot sell their items or autographed items for revenue. My next reason athletes should be paid is because they are the core of the collegiate sports. Without the players, there would be no revenue period. My next point is that the scholarships are not enough to compensate or the time the athletes put into their sport. Although the

The average tuition and fees for a private university is $30,094, these top-level athletes have their tuition and fees already paid for. That is more than enough, 30,094 dollars a year for the four years in college, that’s over 100,000 dollars these athletes are saving and yet they keep pushing for more. The NCAA should never pay these athletes for their competition, athletes already have so many more benefits than the average student, yes, and athletes have more responsibilities than a normal student, but not over 100,000 dollars’ worth. Also if the NCAA were to pay division 1 college football players, what about the other division 1 sports who put in just as much or more time? Would they get paid too?

The Topic I decided to debate was should college athletes be paid a salary? The side that I decided to pick was the pro side. To begin every year many new college athletes get drafted, they are excited to play a college sport and represent their school. But, these students may face a different challenge outside of school. These challenges may include not having enough money to pay for tuition, not enough money for new clothes, they may still live with their parents in a spare bedroom, and they may not have enough money for food.

Most college athletes do not end up going pro they end up like the vast majority of people,and go into a field related to their major. The scholarship athletes get can give them their degree for way less than the average student. College athletes also get to develop great characters like honesty, integrity, and leadership skills all qualities future employers look for in their employees. Division one college are not making money they are non profit organizations. So where would the money come from to pay the athletes?

Whether or not student-athletes should be paid has been a hotly debated topic since the 1900s. College athletes spend just as much time, if not more time, practicing and devoting time and energy to sports as they do academics. For this, many athletes are rewarded with scholarship money. However, many people believe it is not enough. Should we pay student-athletes a slice of the wealth or is a full-ride scholarship enough? (Business Insider). What if the athlete gets injured? Where does the money come out of to support each athlete’s salary? The huge amount of money being generated from college sports has led some people to think that the athletes are entitled to some of that revenue. While, some think that student-athletes should be paid, others disagree for various reasons.

Have you ever heard of a business that made billions of dollars, yet did not pay their employees? Seems pretty remarkable doesn’t it? Well this business is known as the NCAA. According to an article in the New York Times, the NCAA made $770 million from just the three-week Men’s Basketball Tournament, but how much did the athletes who participated in said tournament receive? If you said zero then you would be correct. The athletes that poured their blood, sweat and tears into practice everyday and into the 30 plus game regular season did not see a dime. It is hard to fathom how an industry of

Kids grow up loving to play sports in their free time. They never get paid to play when they are at a young age. They do it for the love of the game and for the need for competition. This is the way that it is in college right now. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. They don’t get paid a cent. It has been a common debate if that is the right way to do it. Should it be that college athletes do not deserve to get paid for playing a sport? It should not be this way. College athletes certainly should get paid to play.

Working at a job full-time serving tables while enrolled in school with a full load is difficult enough, but when students decide their scholastic achievements lack the certain luster that may provide a means to support themselves and their family, it becomes useful to try one’s hand in the athletic dogma that is college sports. According to Show Them The Money, written by Donald H. Yee, his most important statement is, “we all know that the sole focus for many star college players is getting ready for pro ball, that coaches are looking for financial security on the backs of teenagers and that boosters enjoy the ego stroke that comes with virtually owning a piece of the team. There isn’t anything inherently wrong about these goals, but there

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes