Should Dogs Be Allowed In The Bulding Research Paper

Innocent canines are spending over half of their short lifespan alone and bored because of school! Dogs, man's best friend are treated unfairly, and are not allowed in schools. These dogs are bored and alone all day because kids and parents are gone. Dogs are living things too, they should be able to do the same things as us humans, and dogs lives are not any less valuable than our lives. Dogs should be allowed in schools because they relieve stress, they would make school fun, and it would help dogs live longer.

Dogs can be very dangerous if not trained right. If dogs are not on a leash, they will bite or attack if they feel threatened. By building an area where dogs are allowed to run around without a leash around strange people and dogs, you are increasing the number of people every year who get attacked by dogs. This, furthermore makes dogs look like aweful pets. You are putting your pets and people in danger.

The final reason I have to support my claim that pets should be allowed in the classroom is because children benefit from interacting with another living thing such as an animal. One way this is true is because is helps strengthen kids social skills. In the article “Pets Enhance Learning” it says that

According to one article '' That 37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing for a place to live''. With dog parks everyone would benefit. Without a place to take dogs they may never socialize much and can become aggresive.Though a good point can be made that dog parks can be loud at times. I still believe that dog parks are needed.

This first statement is followed by the opinion that it would be a lawsuit waiting to happen and a burden on taxpayers. In the second paragraph the author starts off by stating that some cities require dog owners to obtain a permit in order to allow their dogs off-leash in a dog park. The author provides no citation for their data and it sounds like a false statement. They then go on to explain that most cities rely on people respecting the park rules but the rules are often not heeded. Once again; the author provides no citation, proof, or data to back up their statement. They then explain that if a dog is off leash in a park and acts out violently and bites a person or another dog then the victim can rightfully sue the owner of the dog and the city as well. Once again: no data to support the statement. In the thrid paragraph the author finally starts providing data to support their cause. The explain that an average dog barks at about 75 decibels and large breeds at 100. They then state that noise levels around dog parks have caused issues in cities in Virginia and Arizona. In the fourth paragraph the author states that taxpayers should not have to fund a project such as a dog park because the fence alone will cost $70,000. They then state that dog owners should not be able to pressure the city to build a dog park just so they can excercise their pets. They then state that they own a cat but they don't pressure the city to build a catnip garden. They leave off with a statement saying that people's pets are their own responsibility and not that of the community. They also state that if dog owners want a park then they sould build it themselves, with their own money, far out of

Deciding whether or not I should agree with dogs being allowed in our work place was very tricky for me. I appreciate your desire to make sure every employee feels comfortable and stress-free at work. Also, I adore dogs and would love to able to have my furry-friend alongside me all day long. However, after looking at the pro's and con's, I'd have to say I do not agree with this idea.

You never hear about a pit bull doing anything good in the media. And they have a stigma to them… and, in many ways, pit bulls are like young African-American males. Whenever you see us in the news, it’s for getting shot and killed or shooting and killing somebody - for being a stereotype.

why all service dogs should be allowed in all public places. Service dogs should be allowed in

The Dog Town Skate Team exemplifies Houston’s stance that California is both a “place and a state of mind”. Houston details California’s bountiful- indeed, seemingly endless reserve of natural resources- its “loamy soil”, “grazing land for cattle”, gold, and the oil reserves that enriched 1920s Long Beach as well as many other locales- that have both supported native peoples and drawn immigrants to California while subtly developing a similarly golden perspective or outlook within the people. California’s rich biodiversity and vast natural resources morphed within its occupants’ beings into a similarly rich mindset, holding as early as the 16th century that within California- the Amazonian paradise described in Garci Ordonez de Montalvo’s novel,

Should pitbulls be ban? I think pitbulls should not be ban, people should be allowed to have pit bulls. Pit bulls are not dangerous dogs. They are animals, they should be welcome to homes. Pit bulls can be dangerous if you train them to be that way or if you treat them bad. When I had a pit bull, the pit bull was nice, me and my family were happy to have the pit bull.

Ruff ruff! This is a noise that we hear every single day just about everywhere we go. It’s a sound that we just can’t block out. The only thing different between some of us is that there are some people that are scared and wonder what dog is making that bark. They wonder how big that dog is, or if it is a nice or mean dog, but most of all what breed it is. When people see certain types of breeds they assume the worst. Which is exactly what people in the world think about pit bulls.

Since ancient times the pit bull terrier has been bred for violence; warfare, hunting dangerous game, and dog fighting. The breed was really never meant to be an affectionate family animal. People should not be able to keep pit bulls as pets.

I think that dogs should be able to come into our school. it is a good for dogs to come through because people in this school are not always that responsible. we have to keep the kids of this school safe, even if they don't think that it is the right call to stop them from doing drugs right now, a lot of people will one day realize that doing that stuff is not what they want for there body and then they will look back and thank us. Privacy is a huge thing, but our privacy can and should be taken away a little bit if we are going to misuse it. It is our job to keep this school and the people in it safe.

Bark! Bark! Are you scared of dogs? Well you shouldn’t be. Imagine this, you had the decision to execute dogs only if they bit a person. I’d say no. There are many things happening in this world and you think about that? Anyways, here are the following reasons why they shouldn’t be executed.

Being a dog owner myself I know how much they can be a distraction, or even a neusanse when trying to work or rest. With that said I also know that my dog in a lot of ways and times has motivated me, or just been good company while working. I think that bringing dogs to work would overall have a positive impact on work rates and productivity, like it was stated in Response #1, “Certainly the nearly one in five American companies that allow pets in the work place wouldn’t continue to do so unless it was an effective employment strategy.