Should Drivers Be Allowed In High School

Even though in this article it states that there are some representatives that would not be for signing the bill for personal reasons, the only other thing that it comes down to from a legislative point of view is transportation funds.

To begin, students will have much more free time in their evenings if Drivers Ed was offered within school hours. Teenagers would be able to complete more homework, work longer shifts at their job, and be able to hang out with their friends more. Teens would have more learning opportunities such as: doing

This statistic proves how not many students are doing as good, considering the majority of them scored “below basics”. However, if we were to pass the policy then the score would most likely rise because students would be working harder in school and doing what they need to do. It could possibly give the student a better comprehension level and decision making level, so when they do begin driving the people around them along with themselves will be safer.

The article has no statistical evidence to support the ideas they provided. They also offer no statistics on how the revoking of a student’s license has made a positive impact on a student’s academic life. Therefore, I think taking away a student’s privilege to drive is unfair and would have minimal effect on improving their academic

One reason California should implement this law is because it gives students an incentive to work hard and get better grades. When teenagers get their driver's licenses they have a whole new sense of freedom. When this privilege is revoked, many teens don't want to have to rely on other people to transport them places

Recently there has been a debate whether California should pass a ‘No Pass/No Drive’ law. This law states that if a student under 18 who skips classes too much or drops out of school would not be allowed to drive. Many people think that this law is unfair and should not take effect because it doesn’t guarantee that students will get better in school, but that is simply untrue. In fact, I believe this law should be brought into California because it motivates students to get better grades and will lower the crime rate of California.

In today’s world high schools on average has a whopping 25% dropout rate. To fix that rate some states have passed a No Pass/No drive law that causes people who don’t do well in school or don’t go to school to lose their driver's license. This should not be passed in california because of two main reasons one of which being that all of the resources used in passing the law could be used to help out struggling students and schools. The other thing that should hold back the law is the students who need their car to get to work and if they couldn’t go to work they couldn’t help out their

People should have a high school diploma before they get a driver's licences for two reasons they are, some people are too immature to be handling a driver's license, some people who do have a driver's licence but no car sometimes don’t really have enough education about how to drive cars, but for a counter claim ;however, Most people would learn at a younger and better age to drive than those who learn to old and have some difficulties remembering.

The parent or legal guardian, with the help of structured lesson printouts, serves as the driving instructor in teaching their teen 44 hours of behind the wheel driving lessons.

Every year, around a million of high schoolers dropout due to many different reasons. Not to mention the failure rate of teens for their driving test slowly going higher after every passing year. So would putting up a bill requiring a person to earn a high school diploma before he or she could receive a driver’s license is just asking for more trouble. Having up a law that requires this type of accomplishment would just make living in a poor household even harder, especially when the teen in question needs to dropout to help his family survive on what little they have. Plus, what would happen to those that have their license now, but have not graduated high school. The bill must be resented at all costs to keep everything flowing well.

First off teenagers should be able to get their license at 16 because parents won’t be able to drive teenagers to their jobs and school all the time. Most parents have jobs and need to leave early but their child doesn’t need to be at school for another hour, but without a license the child won’t be able to get

If only people with a high school diploma were able to receive a driver's license then it would not be helping the community; but rather hurting it. Currently, whoever passes a driver's test and has enough hours of experience driving is able to receive a driver's license. This makes it easier for students to get to work and it benefits multiple groups of people that may not necessarily be students. If a law is passed that would ban "uneducated" people from being able to drive, then a lot of things will be affected in a negative way.

Here’s a scenario: seventeen-year-old Ashley has mandatory play practice at her high school tonight. Because her mom and dad are at work, she doesn’t have anyone to take her. Usually, in an event like this, she would be able to drive herself to school. Except, the state has just released a law ensuring that anyone under the age of eighteen cannot operate a car. The state legislature should not raise the legal driving age to eighteen because it gives teenagers the independence they have been longing for, parents will no longer have to chauffeur their children around, along with the teens running errands and performing tasks for their parents, and car ownership and driving teaches teenagers the values of trustworthiness and responsibility.

As a teenager, I can say that many of us have the dream to, one day be behind the wheel of a car and see the world. It gives us a sense of freedom, and tells us that we are stepping into the adult world. Driving give us the power to explore the world, but in order to obtain this power we must follow a strict set of laws. When it comes to theses laws some teenagers would agree that they are fair and keep us safe, but others believe that the laws restrict our freedoms on the road. I personally believe that driving is a privilege, not a luxury and that teenagers need to prove that they are responsible enough to drive on the road.

Young and amateur teen drivers have always had more chances to get in car accidents than other age group drivers have. However, in the recent years this situation is spinning out of a control. According to World Health Organization (2016), 1, 3 million adolescents in 2015 have died in car crashes and all of them could be possibly precluded. Young drivers are becoming more careless and audacious to the driving process. Modern adolescent are easily disturbed or distracted to useless things during driving. In fact, Almost 60% of total teen crashes amount to distractions like peer passengers and mobile phones (AAAfoundation, 2014, as cited in Lowy, 2015). This expresses into reluctant attitude of adolescents to simple essential rules such as seat belt use, correct posture of driver, prohibition of mobile phone usage and restrictions to loud music. Teen drivers do not realize how crucial and outrageous their way of driving could be and what consequences this drive can give. This issue is not new for politicians, public characters and community themselves. Plenty of discussions and speculations are made on possible solutions. Despite the sufficient quantities of settlements, the majority of them are not influential or cost-worthy to be implemented. Thus, as the number of crashes, involving teen drivers, is drastically increasing, some measures should be taken like engaging parent in teenage safe driving as well as adopting amendments into driving education