As citizens of the United States, we often fail to realize the things we are privaligded to have. Some countries are left without the privalidge of choice. In the despute between whether or not these elctric voting machines should be used i stand neutral. Voting in America is one of the most honorable privaledges you could have as a citizen, yet we take it so lightly.
I think voting should be done via EVMs in the following essay I will tell you why, and also tell you how to fix some of the problems that voters may have with EVMs.The first and one of the most valueable assetts provided by EVMs is it's ability to provide ballots in different languages.A voter in which english isn't thier first language is less likely to go out and vote due to a fear of not understanding what they are voting for which is why a machine that provides ballots in an array of languages will most likely improve the number of voters.Paper ballots come in only 4 languages this is due to high printing cost with the EVM you save the printing cost and provide accessibility to ESOL voters.A second benefit to the EVMs is easy access to
We're all searching for the easy way out but that's not always the right choice. Not everything new is better. There's better ways to make voting easier for disabled and elder people. For example; Easier access to buildings, wheelchair ramps, less crowds. Not everyone uses or knows how to use computers.
Many people argue over whether or not people should use EVMs or paper ballots. This is a very serious argument. The reason being that this is how we make important decsisions as a community that directly influences the goverment and controls most of our daily lives. People argue over the safety of voting and how it can be swayed, however this is why EVMs should be used more.
Paper ballots use ALOT of paper. Which is a waste of trees! If you do the math there are about 1 million people a state. Thats 50 million small papers being wasted on polls every time we vote. EVMs are electronic. They use a large amount of materials. Once. even though theres 50 million people thats only hundreds of EVMs. Not millions! The choice for EVMs will make voting better in many ways.
In the passage, 'Electronic Voting Is a Bad Idea', there are numerous reasons stated advocating against the use of EVMs. In paragraph one it is said, "According to at least one study, poll workers are often poorly trained on how to use EVMs. Sometimes the workers don't even know how to turn the machines on!" In 'Everyone Should Be Able to Vote' it mentions that one of the main draws to using EVMs is that the disabled and those who need a ballot in a language other than English would find it easier to use. The inexperience of poll workers would simply cause more confusion to the voters with special requests. EVMs would also cause problems for citizens who have limited knowledge on how to use computers. It is cited in paragraph 3 of "Electronic voting Is a Bad Idea', "In a 2004 national survey, researchers from the California Insititute
EVMs are simply more efficient than paper ballots. When a vote occurs, every citizen's ballot is stored in the machine's memory then digitally transferred to a single location to be tallied up. With paper ballots, each slip of paper must be carefully stored and counted
Even if your disable you could use the EVMs with not worries or trouble. American Vote Act wanted to make it easy for voter's with disable,by replacing outdated voting tool with more easier EVMs. The American Vote Act also made it very conving to voter with reduce vision by adding audio and voice system. Plus they have devices for voter's in wheel chairs or who can not stand long periods of time.
The use of EVMs can greatly improve the voting exerience for all Americans and can insure an all around safer and more comfterable experience. The use of electronic voting machines is surely the future of the voting systems of the united
It would be a good idea to have a law that required registered voters to vote in elections. If there was a law that made people vote, or at least gave them some incentive to vote, there would be a large increase in the amount of people voting. According to the paper by Eric Weiner Australia’s percent of registered voters voting in elections increased from less than 60 percent to 95 percent. That is over a 35 percent increase which is a huge deal when it comes to the amount of people voting, verses those who aren’t. In Australia there is only 5 percent of registered voters who aren't voting while in america is about 43 percent of voters according to Washington post. That is a huge difference.
First if a person was handicap they need to feel like they have contributed to nameing the new president and his cabnet people. The hand held devices are extremely good to help with a person that can't write or have any movement of their fingers, can't stand for a long period of time. Another reason is if they can't read or speak our language there is several different languages on this devise.
This expansion in voting eligibility would be would be favorable to students who are graduating and are newly aware of political issues. Allowing people to vote before they turn eighteen would be positive for young voters. Assimilating themselves with fresh knowledge of history and government. It would cause a surge amongst srudents to vote as schools can advocate voting participation. In doing so, creating anticipation among the following class of students that would be eligible.
Some people cannot just get out and vote because they have health problems or disabilities. Using the machines are easier for a lot of people. The article states that 97% of people said they had no trouble using the machines. The machines are very upgraded and are also easy for people with bad vision and for people who have trouble standing up.