Should Everyone Serve?

n some countries, citizens are required to serve in the military for a year or more. The United States doesn’t enforce the same rules as them, but should they? People may think its cruel to make people join the military, some may say that it’s a good thing. So far there are only 26 countries that do so. The 26 that does so, does it for their safety. If everybody in your country had some military training, would that be good or would it go wrong?

The importance of furthering education doesn’t stop there. Leaders should be enrolling in college, and counseling their subordinates to enroll in college as well. In order to become competitive within the Army’s ranks, education plays a huge role. As Major Tim Martin stated “A formal education is an important contributor to the development of leadership qualities and attributes that are crucial in the growth of a military professional (Martin, 2001).”

Think also, the possibility of forcing young criminals between the ages of 18 and 25 to join the military. Maybe due to joining the military, these young criminals would be reformed into honorable, self-respecting individuals or become leaders of our great nation. In addition, if military conscription were implemented, the tax payers would not have to pay for the juvenile criminals to be locked up in maximum or minimum security centers.

With all the controversy surrounding mandatory military service, past and recent incidents have shown a greater need to protect ourselves from those who wish to do us harm. Continued decline in enlistment, and a

Mandatory military service can help promote national unity. First, it will allow Millennials to learn and train together, creating a shared experience and a conversation starter of serving in the military. Then there is the general understanding of what life actually is in the army and what will have to be done in order to protect the country and yourself. Millennials will be able to understand and adapt an appreciation for the sacrifices that many people in the military make for their country. More importantly, it’ll bring everyone together as a country, especially with a threat from other nations. When the nations do

Compulsory National Service was accepted by many Americans back when the nation was starting to become a powerhouse and wars were beginning to emerge. However, forcing young adults to join or at least register for the military at the age of 18 or is wrong because it is against their free will, they may have a different career path in mind that could be disrupted if a war is to emerge and it will affect their mental state and they could be diagnosed with PTSD.

In different countries all over the world, it is mandatory for every young person to serve at least two years of service in the military. Many people believe we should have the same policy in the United States. People should have their own choice to serve in the military or not because mandatory military service is unfair and does not give each young person the right to express themselves in their daily life.

In addition, there are four countries with the law mandating military service, but other places are trying to mandate

For many recent years, facing the terrorism context happening in a few countries, people have lost too many things, such as lives, relatives, land, and houses after any attack. To build a powerful country and protect it from the attacks, a country needs to have available powerful military forces. Thus, a few countries require young people to serve their country two years of military service. By that way, some people think that the United States should adopt a similar policy of mandatory conscription for all young people who should serve a two-year period of national service. However, some others assume that serving in the military should be each individual’s choice. It means that the U.S forces would be unreliable and less powerful if unmotivated

Instating mandatory service in the United States is not only wholly unrealistic, but would infringe apon our rights. While it is of noble intent to wish for as many people as possible to lend a helping hand, we cannot let ourselves be swept up with baseless patriotism and emotion. We must examine a proposal with such far reaching ramifications with absolute scrutiny.

During the Napoleonic era, the educated Officer Corps was created which is another operational and tactical strategy that has been implemented in modern armies. The idea was to have junior and middle level officers receive specialized training to cultivate their decision making skills and to allow them time for personal study. This change ensured that even in the absence of communication from Napoleon, there was a clear chain of command and tactical decisions could be made in real time. The process by which officers were recruited and selected also changed. France moved into an era of universal service so that anyone regardless of class would be able to enter the military and advance within its ranks. This remains true for soldiers that now serve in the United States military and in armies around the world. An individual’s ability to be promoted has more to do with their level of education, length of service, aptitude level, demonstrated skill and a soldiers ' willingness to respect their chain of command. Arm forces encourage, recruit, and compensate individuals based on their educational levels. For instance, more soldiers enter the military as

The modern world accepts laziness, disrespect, rebelliousness, and mediocrity. The days of hard work and discipline are long gone; replaced by decaying morals and nonexistent parenting. If this nationwide contagion continues to develop, the result will be a country unable to sustain, govern, or defend itself. The solution is evident: military service. Mandatory military service in the United States for individuals 18 years of age for a period of two years would have numerous benefits, as well as alleviate many problems facing America.

Countries such as Israel, Germany and Malaysia, have implemented a system which requires young adults to complete either a year of military service or community service. The countries each have their individual reasons. Israel sees service as a right of passage into adulthood. Germany’s hospitals and charities rely on the work and in Malaysia the year is used to promote racial harmony along with patriotism. This requirement builds the economy in each country; however, would this be beneficial for the United States? While community or military service for a year would promote individual growth, encourage young adults to give back into their community and start developing key workforce skills, it would ultimately come at too high a cost; it would degrade the value of service and dilute our military.

This essay will consider to what extent military service is the duty of all citizens of a state. After looking to define key terms in the discussion, and with consideration of the social and military effects of universal military conscription with concise case studies, this essay will conclude that the claim that military service should be an issue of all citizens is, to a degree, valid.

One of the most successful tools that the United States’ federal government offers is the armed forces. During 1973, the Selective Service publicized that the draft was finally over, giving American citizens a choice if they wanted to join the armed forces. After this announcement was made, the military decreased in size with millions of people not taking advantage of the benefits that the federal government offered. The military presents a plethora of opportunities for people during their active service, and afterwards in the civilian world. Mandatory military service will open doors for many Americans and present opportunities for poverty stricken families. Americans must take advantage of military service, allowing them to benefit from the opportunities it offers, developing a sense of patriotism for all citizens.