preview

Should Governments Have To Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay

Decent Essays
Open Document

How Much Access Should Governments Have to Weapons of Mass Destruction Since World War I, weapons of mass destruction (WMD) have been use to fight wars. Since then massive groups of people have said their opinions on whether they like the governments having and using WMD and they would like to see a ban on the use of WMD forever. The world has not seen the end of WMD, so the controversy still remains; while some believe that WMD cause more harm than good, there are others that say otherwise. One group of people think that governments should have little to no access to WMD. One reason why they think that governments should have little to no access to WMD is because “With their huge, explosive power, nuclear weapons could potentially destroy the planet “(Nuclear Disarmament). If the government was to use a WMD large enough it could cause fatal damage to our planet. Another reason why a WMD should have restricted …show more content…

I will use the points on the position against WMD. first of all yes, “With their huge, explosive power, nuclear weapons could potentially destroy the planet “(Nuclear Disarmament), but we are nowhere near that point. There are an estimated total of 20,500 nuclear warheads in the world today. If the average power of these devices is 33,500 Kilotons, there are enough to destroy the total earth landmass. For reference, the fat man bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki was about 20 kilotons. Second of all yes, some bombs can create “Such a reaction releases more than 10 times the energy of a typical chemical reaction...The explosion of a nuclear bomb creates a huge fireball and a giant mushroom-shaped cloud, both of which release deadly radiation that spreads over an area far greater than the explosion itself”(Nuclear Disarmament). With it injuring the country, it renders the country defenceless and forcing it to

Get Access