Should High School Schools Have Coed Schools

Hutchison and Mikulski argue that students tend to concentrate better when boys and girls are separated. “Both principals and teachers believed that the main benefits of single-sex schooling are decreasing distractions to learning and improving student achievement.” However, single sex education does not provide socialization. Educating students in single sex classes limits both genders from interacting and working together. One day they will coexist with the opposite sex but how are single sex schools/classes going to prepare the student to interact with the opposite sex when they are

“Educating students in single-sex schools limits their opportunity to work cooperatively and co-exist with members of the opposite sex” (Stanberry,

Throughout the years same gender schools have been an expanded issue. Many thought that it would benefit females, and increase their effort in the classroom. However according to Pros and Cons of Single-Sex Education, Jefferson Leadership Academies reversed its same sex curriculum. This was due to their unfortunate test scores. Also, in the real-world society is not divided into genders.

Coed classes and schools have always been the norm for majority of students across the country, many may not even know or even consider that there is another option. Single-sex education. In simple terms this when classes/schools are separated by gender, all the girls are together and all the boys are together. Some say this is a better alternative than coed teaching, but I don’t agree with that. Not just because it’s my personal opinion but because there is proven evidence that there are no more benefits that come from single-sex education then that come from normal coed teaching. I will show you what I mean through the rest of this paper, so let’s get started.

Until the 20th century, education in the United States was gender-specific. Coeducation progressively came into the American educational landscape in the late 1800s, and since that time, same-sex education primarily has been confined to exclusive and denominational schools. Beginning in 2002, after the No Child Left Behind Act was passed, single-sex education has been growing in popularity. According to the National Association for Single Sex Public Education, the United States has over 95 single-sex public schools and more than 445 public coed schools offer single-sex classrooms (Novotney, Amy). With the popularity on the rise, many questions have been asked as to whether this divide in the classroom is academically ailing to a child’s learning or if it is not. By examining the successes of single-sex classrooms, school districts and parent’s can more fully understand that single-sex classes can implement changes to enhance students learning abilities.

Same-Sex education harms children more than it helps students because students lose their collaboration skills with the opposite sex that is desperately needed later in life. Although single sex education may help break down stereotypes, schools should stick to coed because few educators are properly trained in gender specific teaching, gender differences in learning aren’t the same all around, and kids need to learn to coexist and work with the other sex.

Education has been an important factor of all of our lives for an exceptional amount of time, but unfortunately, America has been falling behind from other nations in their education system compared to other nations (Pahlke 444). Almost all of our public schools in our country are coeducational and only handful of them are single-sex educational schools. Single-sex education should be taken into high consideration for most students to attend because of the benefits they might gain from them. It is important to look at all possible ways to try and better our education system for the benefit of the children and teenagers attending school. The most important years of schooling that provide a solid background for all students would be

There are many pros and cons about going to a single-gender school along with, a co-ed school. In the passage “Single-Gender Schools Make the Mark” And the passage “Co-ed Schools are Here to Stay” It is very difficult to make up your mind and pick your opinion. Many people thought that single-gender schooling was wonderful and they were here to stay, But that was not correct. I believe that co-ed schools are great for not only the students, but a great adventure for the teachers too.

In 2006 federal legislation allowed public school districts to create single- gender schools and classrooms for their students. That was a wise decision considering single sex schools have been proven to benefit students. Although society insist that coed school is a superior learning style and is key to getting better grades they are wrong, single sex schools actually have a better history with the educational performance of their students and due to that their students are acknowledged to obtain a more profound career path.

The current public education system claims to have the student’s best interest as a top priority, but in reality, it is actually harming the students. Almost all are short-changed the way education is set up now. Boys and girls learn in different ways. They are not different merely because of how they are treated in society, but because of how their brains function. However, when teachers try to teach different genders at the same time, the majority of the time, it just will not work. Badly needed are teachers that understand the differences between, and how to teach, boys and girls. Coed schools hurt more than they help, not allowing children to reach their potential. Single-sex schooling is more beneficial to the student’s learning.

Many people might say the single sex schools are ineffective, because girls and boys need to know how to communicate with the opposite sex. They should be enforced to help children reach their full dreams without the thought of humility standing in their way. School is a place where students get acquainted with the basics of the life, which further helps them to foster their proficiency level in different aspects of life required in this competitive world, and the most important part of school is not where students get time to socialize with each other. Although Co-ed schools are a first choice for most adolescents and their parents, Single sex schools are equally good. In single sex schools, students don't have to worry about sexual

To conclude, single-sex and mixed schools both have their merits. However, I strongly believe that single-sex schools offer far better academic preparation than mixed schools.

A few years ago, separate classes for male and female students were common, but have decreased today. However, some parents are still worried about students’ attention during the class at coed schools. This thought maybe not correct. Because students at coed schools can learn ways to understand and to build friendships with members of other genders, coed school curriculum is more effective for their future lives. Staying in the same classroom, boys and girls have better educational and personal experiences.

Chloe Johnson had everything she wanted during her junior year of high school. A boyfriend, straight "A's", perfect attendance, and lots of friends, but when she moves to a single-gender school, all of that changed. Some people think that single-gender schools are better, and some people think that co-ed schools are better. The argument about which is better, single-gender or co-ed schools, has been going on for a long time. Research suggest that co-ed schools make students feel more confident, and help with social issues among students. Even though having single-gender schools will bring down suspensions and help stop bullying, single-gender schools would be a downfall because, they're not proven to be more academically successful, they're not realistic to future work environment, and they would cause social issues.

In single sex schools boys and girls excel in subjects they usually would not. Single sex schools help children do well in subjects they usually would not be good at or subjects they would not usually try. For example girls do better at maths and science in all-girl schools; boys do better in languages and the arts in all boy schools. My first example to backup my point is a study by Cambridge University in 2006 where their research showed “boys improved in english and foreign languages in single sex classes, and girls improved in maths and physics. This proves girls and boys do better in subjects they usually would not do because they are more comfortable in a single sex school rather than a co-educational school. A second piece of evidence to help argue my point is a United States study that found boys at single sex