Should Horse Slaughter Be Banned Essay

The topic of horse slaughter doesn’t usually come up very often in everyday conversation. Horse slaughter is more of an implicit subject, which your everyday person doesn’t know much about. Because it is highly controversial, it has gone through the cycle of being banded and then reinstated twice in the last 5 years. With being involved in the horse industry my entire life, I have witnessed the effects first hand. Some people see it as killing pets, animal cruelty, and morally wrong. However, I see it as a source of income, a way to stop the starvation and abuse of horses, an export industry for the United States, as well as a quality meal for in times of despair.

Fort Collins Science Center wrote “The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 requires the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and USDA Forest Service to manage theses free-roaming herds for ‘thriving natural ecological balance’” (“Reducing Population Growth Rates: Fertility Control in Wild Horse Mares” 1). Since 1971, the Bureau of Land Management adoption program has provided homes for 235,000 wild horses and burros. From 2012 to 2015, 9,660 horses and burros in total were adopted into private care and 419 were sold into private care. Tom Gorey and Jason Lutterman states “It has been and remains the policy of the BLM, despite the unrestricted sales authority of the Burns Amendment, not to sell or send any wild horses or burros to slaughterhouses or to ‘Kill buyers’” (Grey, Lutterman 2-3). Providing the sale and adoption programs for the wild horses and burros effectively help control the population and proved an acceptable environment for them to thrive. On a side note, my grandparents adopted two wild burro mares who later gave birth to two more. My family has saved four of the wild burros in California. One family saved four horses in two adoptions. Increasing the programs of adoption or sales will help ensure a home and regulate the population of the horses and burros. To enhance the adoptability of the animals, the horses are trained. Throughout 2012 to 2015, 3,023 wild

A question often thought about is whether or not horse slaughter is humane. If you ask many people, they will say no. Why isn’t it humane?

USDA studies show that 92% of American horses killed in American Slaughter Plants were in perfect health. Owners will sell their horses by the pound; they would prefer an overweight horse over a skinny horse any day. “Wild for Life’s” study shows that a great amount of registered Thoroughbred foals born are slaughtered for foal crop. Horses that are sent to slaughtering houses are often rejected from the breeding farms they were sent to. A horse that is rejected is often not the right color, body type, breed or gender. The meat buyers will try and stuff as many horses

Recently, the Texas Humane Legislation Network has been leading the attack on the multimillion dollar companies, citing a law from 1949 that "prohibits possession, sale or shipment of horse meat [intended] for human consumption" (St. Petersburg Times, 9/4/02).  Both companies have filed lawsuits in retaliation. They state that the slaughter of horses eases financial strain, feeds other nations, and is accomplished in a humane manner.

Horse slaughter has been going on for a long time now and humans have increased their horsemeat consumption because of the mad cow disease. Mad cow disease is issued from the fattening foods farmers give to their cattle. In the food are sheep’s’ bones grinded into tiny, tiny bits. Ignorant till the outburst, makers didn’t know that in sheep bones there is the virus of the dreaded disease. The disease doesn’t affect sheep as it is only in their bones but when the cows eat it, it gets into their systems and is passed on through their meat to humans.

First, horse slaughter can help control the horse population. By taking horses to slaughter then people can sell their unwanted, dangerous, and old horses. Now there are many of you that might say they could also just be euthanized, but this would cost the owners a fortune. If they sell their horse to a slaughter house, then the owner no longer has the dangerous horse and he also made money instead of losing money. Since the United States Banned horse slaughter then abandonment and neglect have in increased by 50% according to Alison Rowe attorney at law’s office. The

There is a stereotypical image of horses found in a slaughter hold: they are either skinny, sick, or old. So why should the U.S. prevent the practice? According to the USDA, most of the horses found in a slaughterhouse are in perfect health and are formally owned by people as pets. Many owner’s explanations as to why they decided to send their horse or horses to slaughter is simply because they cannot afford to take care of them anymore, they no longer have a use (lameness) and convenience. Although horses often can be pricey to own, there are other options to getting rid of them as opposed to shipping them off to a slaughter plant. For example, selling them to another person who will give them a home, or even donating them to a horse rescue

Increased awareness regarding animal cruelty would benefit society, pet owners, and animals themselves. When a problem is identified, it becomes easier to work out solutions. Animal cruelty is an issue on a global scale; animal torture and neglect does not only exist in the United States. Animal cruelty is the “crime of inflicting physical pain, suffering or death on an animal, usually a tame one, beyond necessity for normal discipline. It can include neglect that is so monstrous (withholding food and water) that the animal has suffered, died or been put in an imminent

For the past five thousand years the horse has been of greater human interest for its strength than as a food source. However, American horses are still shipped over our borders and slaughtered for human consumption overseas. Horse slaughter and the export of horses from the United States should be banned because it is cruel and inhumane; furthermore, consuming American horse meat can be detrimental to human health.

When many people approach a horse, they instantly feel cautious of their surroundings. These people tense up and become terrified because of the horse’s size, how they look, or just because they have heard of people being injured from horses. Many people are intimidated by how big some horses can be and they do not want to be around them. Horses are only thought to be a dangerous animal, but they have helped humans in many ways. For instance, they have helped with farm work that humans couldn’t have done by themselves, and they were a mode of human transportation for many years. The things horses have done for humans have helped in many ways, but horses have many other purposes that can help people out. Although many people agree

There is a large problem of animal cruelty linked to the food industry in the United States. Countless slaughterhouses, chicken farms, and other meat producers have been found guilty of harming animals and killing them inhumanely. This is something that clearly needs to change.

Animal testing should be illegal. Death is the outcome of animal testing experiments carried out in inhumane ways. The animals, (such as rats, dogs, cats), are prone to die from exhaustion, medical malfunctions in their bodies, or from various diseases. Animals are used as a prime aspect in a human's life. They are used for viable resources such as food and even household pets. Animal testing is archaic. There is many alternatives that could preserve animal life. It is also unethical because animals are organisms that experience the same feelings that any other human does. Animals bodies are also different than humans, so experiments that are carried on may find a cure within the animal but it's never promised that the drug will transfer

An animal is taken, injected with all kinds substances, then killed from the tests ran by researchers. Meanwhile, an old woman is laying on her death bed waiting for the same researchers to find a cure but dies before researchers can succeed. Which scenario do you think is worse? This is a difficult question and may not have an answer. Animal testing has been around for centuries starting with early Greek physicians around 384 BC. These Greek physicians included Aristotle, Erasistratus, and Galen, who all created huge contributions to medical history. Throughout history animal testing has helped to cure many diseases including polio, diabetes, smallpox, and many more. These cures have helped save thousands of lives and would not have been possible without the help of animals. However, these contributions did not occur without the cost of hurting animals in the process. There have been some laws, like the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, that requires safety testing of drugs on animals before they can be sold. Both animal lives and human lives are affected by animal testing in many ways, making this topic very important. 100 million animals die each year due to animal testing but there are also many diseases that haven’t been cured, making animal testing necessary. Animal testing has both saved lives and taken them away. Us humans have to decide how many animal lives are worth the knowledge gained. In this paper I will address and analyze two alternate perspectives,

Animal testing has been around for centuries. It started out for curiosity reasons; people wanted to learn more about the internal construction of the body and animals were convenient—more so than humans. When it comes down to it, the word animal testing and animal research are interchangeable, moreover, both relate to the same meaning: the use of animals in scientific experiments. One of the scientists that made the first major use with animal testing was Louis Pasteur in the finding of milk pasteurization. However, while his conclusions were beneficial as a result from animal testing,that was back in 1880 and a considerable amount of technology has advanced since then. Biomedical research in the past has benefited from animal testing, but now, in 2016, animal research is concluded to be cost ineffective, increasingly inaccurate, and most importantly, how inhumane animal testing really is. Technological advances have happened since the late 1800s and hologram guided surgeries have become available, as well as microfluidic chip testing—all which can help provide a more accurate version of testing than we have been able to do in the past. Animal research has been talked about again and again, only this time, medical advances are finally becoming better and more useful than testing on animals. We must use this information and once and for all move towards the  advancement in limiting the number of animals used in testing, all while reaching for those alternatives in