Should Internet Gambling Be Illegal?

The growing industry of gambling creates revenue from taxes, but is it really profitable? Smith-Christopher claims “the total amount accounts for less than a quarter of the gambling industry revenues nationwide each year.” It can be said that gambling can help economic progress, “Nearly half of all tribal gaming enterprises earn less than $10 million in annual revenue, and one-quarter earn less than $3 million each year. On the other end of the spectrum, about 40 tribal casinos (or about 1 in 10) take in two-thirds of all Indian gaming revenues” (Smith-Christopher). The economic benefits that gambling creates may outweigh the addictions it may create. Walker claims, “As gambling expands, the gambling industry and government are beginning to

In today’s world there are many different types of gambling such as casinos, state lotteries, pull tabs, bingo, sports and internet gambling. Popularity of this activity remains strong in America, however, there are individuals and groups that continue to scrutinize and attack this industry. I believe gambling is a fun social activity that should not be prohibited or policed by the federal government. It should be an individual’s right to choose if they gamble or not based on their own personal beliefs and view point.

Economic The Australian gambling market is remarkable in the world’s gambling industry. It has already been mature and showed a very strong growing momentum with 2.9% annually over the last five years, and it was predicted that the growth rate would be constant in a medium-term period. (Sudarsanam, 2011)There are four categories of gambling activities. Gaming is the largest type with the annual turnover over $10.2b, and other three types are Casino, wagering and lotteries, and the annual turnover was $3.2b, $2.6b and $2.1b respectively. (Sudarsanam, 2011)

In her essay “Against the Odds, and Against the Common Good,” Gloria Jimenez asserts that states should not promote and advertize gambling. Jimenez lists many clever lottery slogans that are deceivingly interpreted. She also argues that these slogans advertise the advantages of gambling and playing the lottery because the money supposedly goes to things such as education and social service. Jimenez explains some arguments in favor of state-run lotteries, such as free participation and the creation of jobs, but argues that they are not relevant to the problem. She briefly touches on a statistic claiming that low income individuals are more likely to spend money on lottery tickets than their opposite, higher income

People tend to spend their money mostly on the slot machines and multiple poker games taking place in the Casinos around the United States. These revenues go towards the workers of the Casinos and state taxes which benefits the other attractions surrounding the casino. The gambling industry has grown massively in little time, it has grown to make around 40 billion dollars a year. Generating this money contributes largely to make a better city or state for visitors or residents to enjoy. These casinos are usually looked down upon but they offer new horizons for men and women in the United States. The online gambling push is also coming to a close consideration with legality and within the next ten years should be completely legal (Bonesteel 1). Online gambling provides a different dimension of many businesses and also sports clubs. Most of the money from online sports gambling goes towards these sports clubs allowing them to expand their club and the league as one. As gambling begins to grow considerably larger in the United States, it is used as entertainment and recreation. As a whole, gambling allows any given city to grow economically and as whole, it brings in plenty amounts of revenue which also contributes to state taxes.

Since the actions of the major online gambling sites promote, and will continue to promote, usage by individuals in states that outlaw online gambling, the sites should be illegal on the federal level since they violated the UIGEA.

The following two paragraphs are a summary of Gloria Jimenez's essay Against the Odds and Against the Common Good. States should neither allow nor encourage state-run lotteries. There are five major arguments that people use to defend lotteries. One is that most lotteries are run honestly, but if gambling is harmful to society it is irrelevant to argue if they are honest or not. The second is that lotteries create jobs, but there are only a small handful of jobs that would be eliminated if lotteries were put out of business. Another argument that would support keeping lotteries is that, other than gambling addicts, people freely choose to buy lottery tickets. This is true, however, there are misleading advertisements that may cause people

Gambling can be very beneficial for the state, as it generates large amounts of revenue. It is a popular source of entertainment for the majority of the adult population, but at the same time, is a dangerous one. Gambling can take over peoples lives, deeply harming themselves and those they are close to. This essay will discuss what state policy should be on gambling by weighing the benefits and costs it has on both the state and the general population. First, this essay will explore why gambling should continue to be a legal source of entertainment. Next, it will examine why gambling must be regulated more than it currently is. Finally, it will analyze potential policies and regulations that the state should implement in an attempt to decrease

Instead, it made it a federal offense, punishable up to five years, for financial institutions to process payments for companies operating in “unlawful Internet gambling.” Sports gambling operations are the only businesses specifically mentioned as “unlawful Internet gambling” within the UIGEA. Otherwise, the rest is left to wide interpretation. Under the UIGEA, games of chance are considered “unlawful gambling,” but no specific games were cited. There certainly is a valid argument to be made for prohibiting games of chance over the Internet, but the authors of this bill ruined their credibility by appeasing state lottery lobbyists. Yes, lotteries received an exemption from the UIGEA even though they are completely subject to chance. Likewise, lobbyists corralled exemptions for fantasy sports, dog racing, and horse

Over the past 100 years people have gambled on horse races, boxing matches, and card games. It has been in human nature to put a bet on a competative game to try and win money. Gambling today has become even more prominate in our society. All over the internet you can find cites to wager on a game or play poker. The problem people gambling on the internet is the revenue goes to companies who do not live in this country. Creating a place to gamble in all cities would create more revenue for our country. Furthermore, it would create more jobs and then populate smaller cities. To help out this economy we need to legalize gambling in the United States.

The concept of gambling has been around since the 1600’s when the original thirteen colonies had their own individual lotteries where people viewed gambling as a “civic responsibility” to play. These lotteries helped establish multiple universities such as Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and William and Mary. Gambling has been legal and then banned several times in three different eras; the first era in the 1600’s to mid-1800’s, the second in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s, and finally the mid 1900’s to present day where some types of gambling remain legal. Throughout multiple decades, people have constantly bickered back and forth stating their opinions on what defines gambling, and if it should be illegal or legal. More importantly, all types of gambling should be legalized in the United States since multiple types of gambling already exist and are considered legal, it’s improper to permit some and leave others out. Moreover, gambling stimulates the economy by bringing tourism to the area and creating jobs for those in need of one, as well as, making revenue from taxes, benefiting the state and local government.

have brought up the subject,”Should Online Fantasy Sports Be Considered Gambling or Not”? Many people believe Fantasy Sports should be illegal or banned. As of March 8, 2016, playing daily fantasy sports for money was considered illegal in 11 states. These states have stated that the online games have broken their gambling laws. In at least 20 other states, regulators and lawmakers were either reviewing the legality issue or working on legislation to clarify the law. Many of these bills, with support from the industry, would allow daily fantasy sports to continue. In the rest of the country, the sites have either been declared legal, or there was no pending

Approximately 80% of Americans gamble at least once per year, in the amount of approximately $500 billion in 2013 (Aziz). Gambling has long held a tradition in America and is now becoming a ubiquitous industry. In recent years, as the gambling industry evolves with technological advancements, the growth of online sports wagering has created widespread concerns beyond those of traditional casino gambling. Legality of real sports betting, which includes betting on actual teams, players, or scores, is determined at the state level, with only four states (Delaware, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon) deciding it is legal to gamble on real life sports. However, online daily

Gambling in the words of McLean and Yoder (2005) "means risking something of value, usually money, on an event that has an unknown outcome." In the opinion of the authors, gambling can assume various forms including but not in any way limited to "casino games, betting on sporting events, playing bingo, buying raffle tickets, and playing lotteries" (McLean and Yoder, 2005). Over time, gambling has grown in popularity with the same being legalized in many jurisdictions across the world. However, those opposed to gambling and the legalization of the same continue to cite various reasons in an attempt to backup their assertions. One of the reasons cited by those opposed to gambling according to McLean and Yoder (2005) is that the costs of gambling easily outweigh the benefits associated with the same. This argument advances the idea that the interests of the society override those of an individual. Thus the

Do you feel it is important to do what you want with your money, without federal or state government telling you what you can and can’t do? This is an argument that is very popular among those who support online gambling legalization and regulation. They try to show the attack on a free society. “If five poker enthusiasts want to voluntarily play online, and if a private company wants to provide the technology for that to happen in exchange for a fee, why do members of Congress feel obligated to prevent that from happening?” (Balko)