Should Juveniles Be Sentenced Life Without Parole

Life without parole is a waste of life. Juveniles have been sentenced to life without parole. Juveniles are never given second chances. I believe that rehabilitation is necessary it gives hope to them. In juveniles Don't deserve life by Gail garinger she states ¨nationwide, 79 young adolescents have been sentenced to die in prison. These children were told that they could never change and that no one cared what became of them¨. In on punishment and teen killer by jenifer jenkins she states ¨The juvenile death penalty was abolished here years ago and a life sentence still allows a great deal of good living to be done even from behind bars¨. After considering both sides

Teens should be spent to adult jail for the crime they committed! In the late 1980s juveniles have been committing crimes during the period of this time, many of them were getting in trouble more often, crimes were getting more violent by this time. On June 25, 2012 The Supreme Court justices who agrued to abolish mandatory sentences to life in prison for juveniles who commit murder or any crimes reflecting the will of Americans society should be punished as an adult . Justice Alito noted that , “Even a 17 ½ -year-old who set off a bomb in a crowded mall or guns down a dozen students and teacher is ‘child’ and must be given a chance to persuade a judge to permit his release into society…” In other words I agree that teens should be sentenced to life in prison, if I did the same crime I should be punished the same way as an adult who has committed the same crime because during this age I know what I am doing wrong and right. I believe that teen should be sentenced to life in prison because the victim's family reactions, rehabilitation, they should understand the consequences of their actions, mental health issues, and heinous crimes.

The truth of the matter is a "kid", "teens" or however you want to call it; are not a grown ups we aren't given the same rights as grown-ups and majority of the time are ignored because we ar not grown-ups; however when it come to crimes we are most definitely taken into considerations. After considering both sides of the debate on juvenile justice, it is clear that juveniles should not face life without parole for the reason that we aren't taken in consideration most of the time as well as our immaturity.

There are articles or news reports every once and a while about juveniles committed heinous crimes, but not serving any real time for the crime. Juveniles or even adults should not serve a few years for murder or rape. Murderers, rapists and other criminals are being released from jail every day after serving only very short sentences for their heinous crimes. (Source #1) Who are these criminals and what makes them so special? The criminals are juveniles who commit these awful adult crimes. Juveniles are being tried every day in juvenile courts and are receiving shortened sentences, and they are being released and given new identities to continue to live in peace. All while their victims and their families are left to suffer forever. Because the juvenile rights and courts believe that second chances should be given to youth that commit crimes. In my opinion that is half-true, if it is a minor crime then yes. If the crime is very serious or heinous or harmful. They should not get a second chance and be tried fairly as adults.

Crime rates for juveniles are increasing and these crimes are getting out of hand. Jurors decide the juveniles’ punishment and some want to keep them in jail without parole. In my opinion, I do not believe juveniles should get life sentences. Sentencing a kid to life sentence without parole basically means you were charged as an adult. Being charged as an adult and a kid is totally different.

Yes, juveniles deserve life sentences in jail if they decide to commit a violent crime. This is because there is no effective deterrent to force them to think twice. Over the course of time, this has resulted in even more juveniles being arrested for these activities. Evidence of this can be seen with figures provided by the Center for Disease Control. ("Youth Violence," 2010)

Criminals are on foot everyday around the United States and other parts of the world. Whether they are young children, adults, seniors, or any kind of human being, crimes are committed everyday by people who look like a bad influence or others that look innocent walking down the streets who have never committed a crime before. Juveniles ages 7-15 should not be sentenced to life without parole for crimes they commit because it would not be fair for them to spend the rest of their lives in jail for committing a mistake. Reasons can be found on why juveniles should be left inside a cell and arguments can build up if people disagree with one another. Some adults commit crimes and are left with freedom after a satisfied amount of time locked up. Young teenagers can still be immature and do not have the mind to think like a regular human being. Young people also do not know what is wrong or right to do since they are not of legal age. Some teenagers are also not fully educated yet for they might have grown up without parents to yell at them to lead them through the right path. Most juveniles are barely in middle school and have not really learned anything about the real outside life yet. Juveniles that are sentenced for a reasonable amount of time can also be rehabilitated once they are out of prison so they can be leaded to the right path again without having to be locked up. Many young men are in rehabilitation centers because they disobey their parents or because they are drug

Sending children to juvenile for life may seem harsh but i think it’s a good idea. I say this because depending on they what they did they deserve it. Like if a child over the age 13 kills someone they should go to jail for life, because they took someone’s life. I feel if kids think they can do adult things when they get in trouble they should be treated as adults. If they were doing normal kid stuff they wouldn’t be in situations that could send them to life anyway.

Just how many juveniles are currently behind bars serving a life sentence? According to an article on Huffington Post, “Nationwide, there are roughly 2,500 inmates who killed as juveniles that are serving life in prison without parole, including 309 California inmates serving such sentences, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.” (Elias). This begs the very question if juveniles should be charged as adults. There are many factors to contemplate when considering that very argument. You have to consider if the juvenile has control over what they are doing and knows it is wrong. However, you have to also consider at the same time that it is possible that their thought processes are not fully developed and they could be rehabilitated to function in society in the future.

Now at the same time there are some juveniles that deserve life sentences such as the offender in the article written by Jennifer Jenkins. This offence wasn't out of necessity nor was it an accident from what Jenkins stated. Personally that’s where the line should be drawn by the government. Youth should not be sentenced to life without parole unless they purposely kill a person without probable cause, which in most cases is in the act of self defense. Other than that teens shouldn’t be tried as adults until they are age eighteen. What do you propose regarding youth being tried as

Into days society there is a lot of debate and discussion on whether or not Juveniles should be sentenced to life in prison. Take in consideration that were talking about kids as young as like 6 years old. People talk about whether it’s right or not in other country’s they even banned the death penalty. Different people believe in different things. For example a group of people believe that juveniles should be sentenced to life in jail if they commit a heinous crime. Then there are people that believe that the juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison. I personally belief that Juveniles or young adults should be sentenced to life in prison if they did commit a heinous crime.

It is not fair that adolescents get the pity they do when they commit a crime but adults do not get any. People also think that when a minor commits a crime that they did not know any better or that they are not old enough to understand the outcome of a crime. Regardless of age, there is no difference of first degree murder or rape or manslaughter. Therefore if an adult gets sentenced to life without parole for those things, so should juveniles. They are the same crimes being

Many children today are being sentenced to various amounts of time to deal in jail. Many times they are being sentenced as adults and are sentenced to life in prison. Teens should not be sentenced to life in prison because many times they end up changing and they are no longer the same person they were when they committed the crime.

Regardless of age, a killer is a killer. A killer can be the daily customer you have at your job or the child you’re babysitting. “The Supreme Court justices would be wise as well as compassionate to strike a balance: Make juvenile offenders responsible for their actions but don't completely rob them of hope. And this should apply not only to the inmates who were 14 at the time of their crimes but to the remaining 2,497 who were 15 to 18 years old,” (Ellison 19). Kids make mistakes all the time, that doesn’t mean we should take their life away from them. With overlooking the listed factors in court when sentencing a juvenile, this will improve the number of children in prisons. Not all of these children partake in the act because of evil, but merely because of

Life without parole should be for people who have committed murder with a full understanding of what murdering someone really mean, and had complete intent to commit murder. These conditions generally do not apply to minors, as a child often is incapable of fully understanding the seriousness of killing someone. One example of this is Jacob Ind, who, in an interview for the PBS documentary ‘When Kids Get Life’ said “I didn't really grasp the permanency of their deaths, definitely didn't understand the gravity of what it means to kill somebody. I mean, I didn't think that they would feel pain. I didn't think that anybody else would be affected” (Bikel, 2007). Jacob was 15 when he murdered both his mother and