Should Minimum Corning Age Be Raised

Young drivers should have to wait until they are 18 years old to get their license because 16 year olds are more likely to get in an accident than an older driver. One author said, “Sixteen-year-old drivers are the most likely to crash, so raising the age at which teens could get their license would save many lives…” (Rubin). Rubin gives a valid reason to why the minimum driving age should be raised from 16 to 18. If the driving age is raised, there would be less people involved in wrecks, which would help the world out as a whole. Even though 16 year olds are more accident prone than other drivers, taking 16 year olds off of the road would save the lives of everyone on the road. However, there are people who believe that the minimum driving age should not be raised because of various reasons. One article states that, “If they have to wait until they are 17 or 18, they remain dependent on parents practically until they are ready to go off to college, join the military or take a

With a graduated license, teens will earn the experience they need to become skilled drivers. According to the text, “Studies show that it is inexperience, not age, that causes accidents.” Think about it: could changing the age from 16 to 18 really prevent accidents or just put more inexperienced adults on the roads? Teens make up 7 percent of all drivers, but are involved in 20 percent of all accidents. The reason being is that many teens do not have the road experience necessary to make safe driving decisions.

Putting teens on the road at a young age as low as 15-16-years-old allows them to gain experience that will help them become more accustomed to the road when they get their driving licences at 18. As stated in the article, Teenage Driving Laws May Just Delay Deadly Crashes, it says “Many teenagers, rather than deal with the extra restrictions for 16-17 -year-olds, are simply waiting until they turn 18, and skipping the restrictions altogether. As a result, a greater proportion of inexperienced drivers hit the road” (40). This proves that teens who do not drive at 16 are more likely to get into car crashes, because they wait til 18 to avoid being restricted like the 16- 17- year-olds. Teens who skip the 16 -17-year-old restrictions are just starving themselves from gaining the early knowledge on driving that is needed to prevent fatal crashes. The same article also says that, “There have been 1,348 fewer deadly crashes involving 16-year-old

Teen driving allows American youth to have their license between the ages 13-15. At this age, our American youth are more likely to be careless while driving without supervision. The younger teen drivers are the more susceptible to fatal car accidents they will be due to the lack of supervision and proper driver’s education. Lack of maturity and experiences leads to developing poor driving habits. The teens in the age group 16-18 are usually more mature in handling a motorized vehicle. States that allow 13-15 year old teens drive are more likely to get in more car crashes from driving earlier and not having enough experience.

You can't take something away from teens they have been waiting their whole lives for. A lot of people will be mad at everyone for raising the driving age.

Well, 18-year-olds have an increasing number of fatal crashes each year while 16-year-olds are decreasing in the number of fatal crashed each year. Since 16-year-olds are wanting to continue to be able to drive at age 16, there are being more laws and restrictions when 16-year-olds are driving. It is also getting harder for 16-year-olds to pass the driving test to get their license which only allows the better drivers to get on the road. In the article “Teenage Driving Laws” it states, “Dr. Masten strongly suspects that the reason for the increase in deadly crashes among 18-year-olds is that many teenagers, rather than deal with the extra restrictions for 16- and 17-year-olds.” This quote is stating that the restrictions are getting stronger and that some inexperienced 18-year-olds are getting on the roadeasier than it should be. All in all, 18-year-olds should have the same restrictions and rules that 16-year-olds have to eliminate as many fatal crashes that we

Are you concerned about the minimum required driving age being too low? Many reports have been made to give reasons why the minimum driving age should not be raised. Teens that abide by the restrictions of a new driver get in fewer wrecks than those who wait longer to avoid the restrictions. These improved restrictions placed on teen drivers as decreased the amount of accidents young drivers have. Teens need their own solo driving experience before learning to avoid simple mistakes.

The false assumptions people have about teens is unfair to the teens who are actually responsible. I as a teen understand how dangerous driving is and how I am responsible for my passengers lives while at the wheel. Why should the driving privilege given to teens at sixteen be changed because of a few bad kids? People need not to have a bad outlook on teens just because some teens are infact immature, but some adults are not very mature either. Teens just need to not be stereotypes then teenagers would not have any excuse to act up if people expected more out of them. Sixteen year olds are perfectly capable of driving, and the new found responsibility could even make teens act more mature.

If the teenage driving age gets brought up to 18, we face two problems. One being they won’t gain experience driving. Number two, parents are going to get more pressure put on them to take their under-aged children everywhere.

The teen driving age should be raised. Ages sixteen to nineteen are more likely to be involved in a crash. Car crashes kill more U.S. teenagers than any other cause. Not wearing a seatbelt, and texting and driving is more dangerous than driving under the influence. Inexperience driving is also a major factor in teenage driving. Some people believe that the driving age should be raised because young adults die from less experience and less maturity. No one would want to lose an older or younger sibling. The driving age should be raised because the most car crashes involved the age group sixteen to nineteen, teenager do not like wearing seatbelts, and teens are more likely to text and drive.

Recently, people have started to become doubtful about the legal driving age being sixteen. They believe that teenagers are immature, childish, indecisive and underdeveloped. People feel that the driving age should be raised to twenty-one so that the society is safer and has more responsible drivers. These people are wrong because teenagers are not as irresponsible as they think. Teenagers need a chance to change others view on them as drivers and become more independent. After turning a certain age, youth do not depend on parents as much anymore and become more independent and self-reliant. Most also believe that teenagers are the cause of many deaths and injuries because of their habit of drinking and driving. Teenagers are not the age group that drink and drive the most. This has been thought to be true for so many years creating false stereotypes about teenagers. It is better to have adolescents learn how to drive so that they are used to driving by the time they are in their twenties and their mistakes are rare, The legal driving age in Canada should not be raised from sixteen to twenty-one giving teenagers a chance to prove their maturity and capability.

The reason why they should lower the driving age is because many teens tend to start getting jobs and its hard to find transportation. Some teens

Raising the age was not an idea based on opinions. Over the years many people and organizations have recorded facts and statistics to support their claims. An example shown on CBS News, shows that “More than 5,000 U.S. teens die each year in car crashes. The rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59, according to the National Highway Safety Administration” (CBS NEWS). One huge influence on the topic was the Insurance Institutes for Highway Safety, they created a seventeen page memo filled with statistics and examples of how raising the age is a necessity. This is not the first attempt to use statistics to support the appeal to raise the age. The Seattle Times states, “The example the institute uses most prominently is New Jersey, the only state with a minimum driver's license age of 17. The report cited a study from 1992-96 in which the rate of crash-related deaths among 16- and 17-year-olds was 18 per 100,000 in New Jersey, compared with 26 per 100,000 in Connecticut, which had a minimum driver's license age of 16 and 4 months” (Willette). Overall the argument that raising the age will result in less teen deaths while driving is highly justified. There are frequent examples and a huge amount of research that proves that younger drivers are more likely to cause harm or damage than an older, more experienced driver.

To begin with, yes most accidents are by teenagers. Thats not because they are bad or inexperianced drivers but because they feel the need to make more fun in the car with friends. Even if the driving age was raised to 18 teens around that age are still having fun and getting distracted in the car with friends.

In America today, it is nearly impossible to live with out driving. People use driving to get to school, work, and sometimes just drive around to have a good time. Most people start driving at the age of sixteen years old. These teenage drivers are prone to being unsafe on the road ways. According to the article, “Teen Drivers,” car crashes are the leading cause of death in teens of the age sixteen to eighteen. Being teens are still young their immaturity can take over when they drive causing them to be unsafe drivers.