Should Musicians Change Their Tune Analysis

Musicians shouldn't change they tune because lots of people attract to things like that , Source number one is telling us that they are going to start changing the music business.

Many artists and record companies do not think that it is a good thing to have their music available for free because they feel that they will lose a lot of money. The thing that they need to realize is that technology is only going to get better and they need to use it

The music industry is one of the biggest industries in the world due to how music is a universal language that does not create barriers, it breaks down walls. People dream all of their life to make it as a big star to write songs and make their mark on the recording industry. For most of the recording artists out there today, music was something that saved them from any troubles. And from then on, it is something that they wanted to create and write as if it is a journal. Music is something that people want to share with each

Furthermore, various songs are specifically written with certain intentions and nuances to express the artist’s values and beliefs about a topic such as, love or the natural phenomena. Based on the passage, “ Source 2: Selling Out Not Worth the Risk”, it states “ But when outside interests enter the mix, they can replace the passion in an artist’s music and turn the art into just another tool for corporations.” To emphasize, businesses have the power to change any lyric in the song, so the song would lose it’s meaning and instead be about the product the business is selling. Even though, allowing corporations use an artist’s song for advertising a product, enables the artist’s song to be heard from an even more

When wanting to listen to a song today, one no longer has to buy or download a physical copy. In today’s world, streaming has become one of the top ways of retrieving music content. This major change has led to a profound shift for the music industry and its artists. It has developed a continuous conflict that affects the way music is distributed and how artists make a living. Listeners stream music electronically through their computers, phones, cars, and more. Most of these streaming platforms allow for the content to be free, which directs to the question of whether music should be free or not. Streaming is a topic that has presented itself to be a valid issue on whether it ultimately hurts or helps artists and their careers. Streaming has both pros and cons, but in order to aim to figure a possible solution there needs to an examination of the history of the issue, a proper analysis of both sides, and evaluating its importance.

The current music industry is a hard business for all musicians, whether they are a new artist or even a popular radio artist. Modern times have radically changed the way that musicians now make money. Past musicians used to be able to make a living simply by selling their music and playing a few major concerts to survive and even lives some luxurious lives and not really have to focus on anything except the art that they were creating. The music industry has transformed from being an art to becoming a challenging business job for anyone involved. Today, most musicians have to also be able to handle managerial business to get anywhere and make money or find someone to help them. Current musicians need to do more than just sell music

Musicians are protected under the First Amendment equally as any citizen in the United States of America. They deserve the same basic human rights we all practice, "however the freedom of expression has special relevance for musicians (Hald 1 of 8). "This offers a special protection of musicians against arbitrary censorship and persecution" (Hald 1 of 8). Not only does censorship of music threaten the freedom of speech, but it also threatens a musician's right to promote their work through free enterprise. "Musicians have the freedom to play music in public or private domains, give concerts, and release CDs" (Hald 1-2 of 8). Some concert

Artists shouldn't sell out their music for multiple reasons. One being is that the artist is practically giving their music away. Using an artists' music in ads means that the artist or artists who made it had to "sell out." To sell out a song, the artist/artists sell the complete rights of the song to major corporations. Even though selling out has been successful in the past, and in cases as in the

Artists shouldn't use their music in advertising. This could lead to them losing their image, or getting the wrong one. It could also mean that the stress of someone else's image is on them, as well as theirs. Some people might believe that this could be great. Advertising could lead to thousands of dollars, and make a

With its extensive history, the role of music in our lives is very unlikely to ever lose its importance. Its presence in every culture has kept music relevant for centuries and will continue to do so despite any lack of sales or interest in other forms of entertainment. Music has always existed; just because it is easier to obtain doesn’t mean it is any less valuble.

This explains how artistget money off of a commercial and it brings fans to them. People that havemade an advertise with music on the background actually get people to buyfrom them. Artists considering an endorsement deal need to remember thattheir sponsors are out to benefit as well. As soon as a musician signson the dotted line of a corporate partnership, he or she has aresponsibility to represent the company and help it sell its products.Many would say it is not a good idea to use music from an artist becauseof how stressful it may be to pick a song that can be used according to you advertisementIn source 2 it states that This can be tremendously stressful for artists who are just starting tobuild their careers, as they need to spend energy creating good musicand a unique image that appeals to fans. Many artist have a hard time trying towrite their songs according to the things fans like of them. Some songs aren't really writtento be used for an advertising.Music in advertising should be used because without it, it won't be worth makingthe advertising. The music in the background actually helps getting youradvertising out in the worlds. Many people would relate to it when they wouldwant to relate to it when making an

International pop star Taylor Swift changed the future of music when she took a stand to Apple Music, a brand new streaming service’s policy which refused to pay artists during the free three-month trial that was offered in late June. The singer-songwriter penned a lengthy open letter to billion-dollar company Apple, pleading for indie artists (ones who need all the money they can get for the work they put out, yet they lack fame and power, both things essential in having people listen to their cries of desperation against the policy) saying that all artists should be paid for their work. Swift stated that the industry doesn’t “ask you (Apple) for free iPhones,” followed by, “Please don’t ask us to provide you with our music for no compensation.”

Moreover, using artists' music in an advertisement could put an image with it. Such as if one of your favorite songs were used in a Pepsi commercial you might think of Pepsi when you hear it. As source 2 says "Robert Schneider, member of the band Apples in Stereo and a Beach Boys fan, tells of the days he heard the song

The music industry is an oligopoly. Since the late 1800’s people like Thomas Edison have been buying up patents in communication technology, forming monopolies, leading to a non-competitive entertainment industry. With only a handful of corporations controlling all aspects of acquisition, distribution and marketing of music, harsh business principles create an exploitative industry that takes the best of what artists have to offer and leaves many of them unable to support themselves. Beginning in the 1950’s with payola and white cover music and ultimately evolving into iTunes and Spotify, the music industry has grown into a billion dollar industry with far-reaching influence and control. Contracts rarely serve the artists’ best interest and many are left out to dry when their usefulness has expired.

There are several ways in which art is commercialized; especially within the music industry. Classic bands such as the Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan were criticized for allowing companies to use their material to sell products and services. However, this is a common avenue for a musician or an artist to profit from their works. Many companies are willing to pay a hefty premium to have their products associated with music that has broad emotional appeal to many potential consumers. However, many people feel that when an artist licenses their material it is a loss of integrity and that something is lost by the commercialization of their songs.