Should Parents Get License For Children Research Paper

Today, obtaining a license is necessary for a many activities including: driving, hunting, fishing, scuba diving, teaching, and practicing medicine, to name a few. In recent debate, licensing another aspect in our lives has arisen: parenting. Although incompetent parents exist, the need for a license to parent is an unethical and unconstitutional requirement that is impossible to regulate both before and after the birth of the child.

Having a licensing system seems to be persecuting someone before the time. For instance, unpredictable things happen all the time, whether someone is not fully ready for a baby, once the child is born some people change their regular bad habits and become responsible, conscientious, and reliable. It’s a complete transformation for majority of parents. Good parenting simply does not just happen; it requires love, work, education and dedication. An irresponsible person before expecting can be the most reckless person, but once he/she knows that they are expecting the burden is on their shoulders and it pushes one to bear

One reason California should implement this law is because it gives students an incentive to work hard and get better grades. When teenagers get their driver's licenses they have a whole new sense of freedom. When this privilege is revoked, many teens don't want to have to rely on other people to transport them places

Parental Licensing Should a couple have to acquire a parental license to have a child and become parents? Becoming a parent is something every one should be allowed to do with out a license but they should take into account their situation and if they are even ready to have a child. In the memoir, The Glass Castle, wrote by Jeannette Walls has gave many examples on why parents should have a license.

Some people are not right for parenting, its either they’re financially unstable, mentally unstable or just plain too young and ignorant to understand what to do. A license for parenting sounds optimal, many people are just unfit to be parents or just are too eager and honestly unprepared. This licensing test/ program would be similar to how we have test for CPR licensing or driver’s license, but it will be just a general idea of things to understand with children. You may argue that you shouldn't restrict people’s views, but what if those views are wrong? The test itself agreeably shouldn’t be restricting at all, it should only be about learning to do and not to do, how to treat your children and care for them simply.

Children are the future of America and the world at large, but as we move these kids up from Kindergarteners all the way up to adults we often overlook the astonishing 25% dropout rate in the United States. There have been many different solutions put forth to solve this but one that is widely used across the country and accepted is the no pass/no drive law. The no pass/no drive law would make it so in high school if you do not attend class often and or fail classes you will get your driver's licence taken as a teenager. Many people are in favor of this law but in truth, a law like this would be a bad idea. I believe that this law would be inadequate, and there are much better solutions than this

Every day teens are given access to automobiles. Every day these young people go to their jobs, classes, and athletic practices. Do they all abuse their driving privileges? No. Then why restrict all teens, including the law-abiding and mature, by raising the driving age? This debate reaches all across the nation, to all levels of government, and many related laws and propositions can be found. If the driving age is increased, teenagers will have more difficulty getting jobs and gaining experience. On the other hand, if the driving age is 18, new drivers will have more maturity. So the question remains, should the legal driving age be 18 years old? No, the current driving age

People should have a high school diploma before they get a driver's licences for two reasons they are, some people are too immature to be handling a driver's license, some people who do have a driver's licence but no car sometimes don’t really have enough education about how to drive cars, but for a counter claim ;however, Most people would learn at a younger and better age to drive than those who learn to old and have some difficulties remembering.

The article has no statistical evidence to support the ideas they provided. They also offer no statistics on how the revoking of a student’s license has made a positive impact on a student’s academic life. Therefore, I think taking away a student’s privilege to drive is unfair and would have minimal effect on improving their academic

Teens should should be eligible to drive when they received a work permit or have proven to parents that they are trustworthy and enough to take on the responsibility of driving. Taking away the driving privilege away from teens will also take away the chance for them to experience the responsibilities of growing up. Allowing a 16 year old and up can also be seen as a way for teens to take on responsibilities as and adults because driving is already a privilege so being a teen will make the fact that driving is a privilege paramount and it will help them to be more mature to keep the privilege.

We are required to obtain a license before you get married and driving a motor vehicle, yet we aren’t required a license to become parents. Should people have to obtain a license to become parents? Is it really safe to leave an infant or 2-4 year old left with a possibly aggressive or inexperienced parent? Children aren’t very safe left alone with an inexperienced parent , ESPECIALLY if they are single or by themselves. People should have to get a license for several reasons: Abuse, most people are poorly prepared, and some people (like teens or some adults) influence their kids . Not just with drug or alcohol , but just their personality can greatly influence them.

Graduated Driver Licensing would ensure that poor decision making and activities would be eliminated and corrected before becoming bad habits, given that the supervising adult is responsible.

In addition, letting kids get their license at the age of 16 will give them freedom and the responsibility of not having to depend on their parents. You

The driving age should stay at 16 because it gives teens freedom. It gives teens freedom because if they don't want to be around there parents they can just leave and go hang out with there friends. If the

     I understand getting a license is difficult, but in the end everything you go through is worth it. The driver will have more experience, more time to learn, and the driver will learn to drive with others as well as driving on your own. So I think that establishment of graduated licenseing is a good thing for teenagers and for society. When you take your