Should Pe Should Be Compulsory In Schools Essay

class. Study hall would benefit the student very well especially because students including myself are stressed out about having the time to finish homework and get better grades trying to juggle school and sports. In addition class sizes would be smaller which would benefit both gym teachers and non-athlete students in some ways. Smaller class sizes help the non-athletes learn more about fitness and staying healthy and have more one on one time with gym teachers. Amy Williams, a guidance counselor at Reynolds high school stated “Having athletes not present during gym gives the teacher more one on one time with other students, and they also don't have to worry about the students who complain and say, “We know how to do this already.” Exempting student athletes from P.E. can benefit the student athletes, non-student athletes and the P.E. teachers all in one (Athletes).

Schools should get rid of sports. Although many people think that sports are relaxing and stress relieving; numerous studies say that for sport players in particular, the lack of time to do work and sleep is crushing them socially, physically, and academically. Therefore, districts should get rid of after school sports because the cost is extreme, this would aid students academically, and they are a

First of all, students do not have much knowledge about the different fitness components; they do not understand the relation between the fitness components and health. If students acquire the background knowledge about fitness, it could improve the class engagement and motivation, and increase the independent drive to exercise. Second barrier to students’ achievement is the lack of motivation to be active, and even more difficult, to specific fitness activities, such as sit-ups and push-ups. In today’s society, students spend more time sitting in front a screen and less time moving. Parent and school today have more responsibility making sure the children get enough physical activity. According to the New York Times (2016), “early school physical education (PE) programs can make a significant difference, and the earlier these routines are learned the more likely they will be carried forth into a healthy adulthood”. Another barrier that prevents students’ success is the loss of instructional time due to discipline problems. The classes are too big, with many diverse students with individual problems, which are difficult to address when these issues are from very different backgrounds. Finally, there is not enough support from home affecting not only physical education, but

Schools are required to have at least an hour of physical activity daily. This is enough time as long as the children are actually doing something that is going to help burn some calories. If they don’t do anything that will make them break a little sweat then the whole physical education class is useless. The PE classes don’t only make the children run but they also teach them what they need to do to stay in some kind of shape for later on in their life. Less than 10% of public schools and private schools provide daily PE (Boyse). Another thing that schools can do to promote physical activity is having the children walk or bike to school. The way they would bike would be monitored by the local government and school programs. The parents of the children could walk them to school so not only do the children get exercise but the parents can also workout. By doing this the parents won’t have to sit in traffic and can save gas. After a time the child will get use to walking and will want to walk instead of taking a car. To start this the child needs someone to walk them and keep them doing it.

First of all, athletes could get injured in gym class. 150% of athletes get injured and are not able to play the sports they love, just because of gym. Therefore athletes could perhaps run into something and get a concussion, which could also lead into not being able to come to school. Education classes outweigh the risks “ being healthy and underweight does not have to hurt”. You would not want to be hurt would you.

Physical education classes are not enjoyed by all, in fact, some students do their best to get out of the class each day, but without this class, students would sit in school for seven hours a day with the only exercise being walking from class to class. While changing clothes and possibly getting sweaty may not seem productive for students who have spent an hour doing their hair, or feel awkward changing in front of others, this class provides positive ways of fighting obesity, releasing energy, retaining more academically, and learning discipline. Thus, students should be required to take physical education courses in high school.

The foundation subjects in the national curriculum comprise of history, geography, modern foreign languages, physical education (PE), religious education, art and design, citizenship, computing, design and technology and music (DFE 2013, p7).

According to Amanda Ripley ever since premot district got rid of sports 80 percent of students passed their classes compared with the 50% last fall. (2) “About 160 people attended parent teacher-teacher night compared with 6 the year before” (Ripley, 2). This shows that students can get higher and much better grades and students can pass their classes; so instead of keeping the sports and other activities, they should get rid of them so their kids can get higher grades and pass their classes. Therefore if districts want their students to pass their classes they should get rid of sports so they don’t have to practice and train and take up all of their

A large amount of schools physical activities are provoking economic complications. According to an article by Amanda Ripley, “New bleachers would cost half a million dollars” (11). A school in Premont, Texas cut off their science lab which was infested in mold; yet, maintained their their after school sports (Ripley, 11). This supports the idea that schools are spending an excessive amount of money on their physical education that should be spent for educational purposes. This evidence proves that districts are spending truckloads of money on their after school physical education.

Currently, at many schools, PE is compulsory until year 11, but only 2 lessons a week, it isn’t enough! Compulsory Nutritional, health and PE lessons could be brought into the curriculum as an assessed class-room subject, PE, and many afterschool programs should become available for students to learn new skills that will help them maintain a healthy lifestyle, also parents could become more involved and learn about the risks of what they’re feeding their children. As well as teaching health, nutrition and PE messages, school PE should mainly focus on getting students involved in regular and fun activities. The education system can also promote healthy lifestyles outside of the classroom, by closely working with students to give them higher opportunity’s to eat better foods and stay active.

Are you willing to take four years of PE when you are in high school? Because of the increasing obesity rate in America, it has been proposed that all high schools should require students to earn four PE credits to graduate. According to statistics, 60.1% of adults in Alaska are reported exercising three or more days a week for at least 30 minutes and one of three children are physically active every day.1 High school students should be required to take PE of their own will and not have to take four years.

Physical education should be a fun class, but fun does not have to mean chaos. I believe in a structure that will allow the students to have fun in a safe way. My lesson plans will be structured so that students are constantly engaged in physical activity. I feel that if I can keep students moving and learning, then the chances of misbehavior will decrease. In elementary school I feel that Instant Activities should be used to get students moving when they get into my class. High school is a little different. I feel that students at the secondary school level should be introduced physical fitness activities that will help keep them in shape later on in life.

Too many PE programs are characterized by over sized classes, poor facilities, and little administrative support. Another dilemma facing PE has nothing to do with the budget or facilities. Some teachers teaching the classes are not properly qualified or trained. A lot of programs have instruction-equating punishment with exercise. From what I understood this had to do with things like, allowing students to pick teams, evaluating performance on things such as showing up properly attired rather than learning, and letting the best athletes in the class dominate.

The controversial topic in the realm of physical education is if physical education should remain in schools. Higher up’s are complaining about test scores and suggesting that cutting physical education programs would lead to better test scores. Technically, this would lead to more time spent sitting in a desk and listening to lectures in class, which is supposed to improve test scores. So, the solution to increase test scores is to take the small chance of physical activity that children receive during the school day and keep them almost completely sedentary for six-plus hours. When physical activity is restricted during school hours, children do not regain the lost physical activity after school, resulting in children who remain

In the modern schools, too many elementary schools are so centered academics and don’t focus on the well-being of the students. The school systems also don’t realize that physical activity can help students perform better in the classrooms. In the recent years, there has been a worldwide tendency to reduce school-based physical education in favor of academic subjects. Given the beneficial effects of exercise and the disadvantages of a sedentary lifestyle, cutbacks in physical education lessons are not near as productive as people think. Systematic reviews provide clear