Should Pit Bull Dogs Be Banned

Pit Bulls are known worldwide for being inherently dangerous and extremely vicious, but according to the American Temperament Test Society, Inc. 86.8% of American Pit Bull Terriers have passed their temperament tests better than Collies, Golden Retrievers, and Beagles. Many people don’t know that the term “bully breed” refers to more than forty breeds that hail from the same root breed. The history of the Pit Bull goes back to about the nineteenth century, during that time they were used to protect livestock, families, and even children as nannies (the Canine Journal). Today Pit Bulls are used as therapy dogs, police dogs, and of course a simple companion. Many myths about pit bulls circulate, which scares society into believing that they are dangerous to us and our families the question of banning Pit Bulls has been hotly discussed around the world, but banning Pit Bulls will not stop illegal breeding, fighting and distribution of Pit Bulls, other dogs from biting, and the problem will grow. The question of whether or not Pit Bulls should be banned is a hot topic in recent society, but the real question is should Pit Bulls be punished for the actions of their owners, or should laws be enforced at a higher degree.

I grew up watching “Pit-Bulls and Parolees” on animal planet, watching and learning about dogs and the Pit Bull breed especially. After years of begging my parents to get a dog, the day finally came. We picked Jackson out from an online rescue center called “Saveabull”. My mom was interested in being an advocate for the breed, so she rescued Jackson to teach others they are not the monsters they are perceived to be on the media. My dad, on the other hand, was not too thrilled with the idea of having a Pit Bull in the house, but he warmed up to it quickly. We rescued Jackson when he was six months old with no information of his previous life and how he was rescued other than he was found on the streets. With this is mind my mom and I made sure

How often do people walk by a place and see someone getting attacked by a pitbull? Pretty much never. So why ban pit bulls from being pets whenever they don’t do anything to anyone? That’s right, they shouldn’t be banned. Pit bulls should be allowed to be pets because they help children and teens with ADHD, they’re not dangerous if raised properly, and banning pit bulls isn’t going to stop all dog bites.

Alcohol is the most abused licit psychoactive drugs that affect one 's ability to think rationally and distorts their judgement if consumed excessively. Alcohol addiction is an illness arising from prolonged and excessive intake of alcoholic drinks. An alcoholic is a person suffering from alcohol addiction. Prolonged excessive use of large quantities can eventually lead to chronic health diseases like cirrhosis of the liver, anaemia, cardiovascular disease, dementia, depression seizures, gout and alcohol related accidents and crime. Statistics show that 9 million people in England drink more than the recommended daily intake while an estimated 8.697 died of alcohol-related deaths in 2014. According to the WHO worldwide alcohol causes 1.8 million deaths (3.2% of total) and 58.3 million (4% of total) of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Alcohol beverages with varied percentage content are consumed globally during religious, social, cultural events, festivals and other occasions. The use of alcoholic beverages has been an integral part of many cultures for thousands of years (McGovern, 2009). Over the centuries, there have been ongoing measures, research, interventions and policies which are aimed at promoting the moderate use of alcohol with a particular emphasis on preventing or reducing undesired outcomes. This essay will outline the key components of brief interventions in alcohol, the difference in approach with traditional methods of treatment and in conclusion, the

In these cultures young people learn from their parents about drinking and the responsibility that comes with it. Engs suggests that we need to change the current prohibition law and teach “responsible drinking techniques” for people that choose to consume alcohol. Engs states facts, suggests alternative solutions, and relates the past from the present; this is why her article is believable.

Should pit bulls be band or should they stay. I think that they should be band because a lot of time they will fight the other dog or even kill them. ya a lot of times people will think that the pit bull is always the one that they are the ones fighting on tv but a lot of times they are not but most of the time they are. I also think that they are always attacking people in the article it said that a young.

Pit Bulls across the world are being banned and euthanized due to their owner’s irresponsibility by being uneducated on how to properly train and care for their Pit Bull. Pit Bulls have been deemed dangerous due to their history of dog fighting and aggressive behaviors, associations with gangs and drug dealers. This problem effects the breed and the responsible families that already own a Pit Bull and are at risk of their family dog being taken away and killed due to breed specific legislation and bans. The solution is to promote education through various websites and organizations dedicated to educating people on Bit Pulls, and proper training with the hope to encourage future and current Pit Bull owners to be responsible for their dogs and

Hi, I'm Aarav and today I will be talking about why I strongly believe Pit Bulls should not be banned and here are my reasons why. My first reason is People say Pit bulls were bred to kill, but that's the owner's fault because their behavior is because of how the owner trained them and treated them and I will list a few reasons to justify my answer. Firstly I will show some facts. According to the Position Statement on Pit Bulls | ASPCA “The reality is that dogs of many breeds can be selectively bred or trained to develop aggressive traits. And the simple fact is that dogs of any breed can become dangerous when they're intentionally or unintentionally raised to be aggressive. All dogs, including pit

Many families in the world have pets they love and care for each day; however, how would the parents and children handle the killing of one of their adored pets while trying to harvest deer? Hunting deer with dogs is a very fast paced technique of hunting. Hunters line up in a horizontal line in the woods and wait patiently for the dogs to flush the deer into their sight. Hunters then shoot anything that runs out of the woods because if they wait too long to determine how mature the deer is, the deer will have already ran by them. Not only are young deer killed, but sometimes, the poor, innocent dogs are shot on accident and a hunter may be in the wrong place at the wrong time also. Hunting deer with dogs should be banned because it decreases the population, pressures the deer, and is dangerous for the hunters and the dogs.

6. Does any one specific evidence stand out to you more than the rest? Which one? Why?

You have heard about the pit bulls ban right? I personally am very against the pit bull ban for these very reasons the media does not tell the truth about pit bulls, the newspaper tells bad stuff about pit bulls and not other breeds when they are just as bad. The last reason is that people over report pit bulls. It is just no fair for pit bulls. The first reason I am against the ban is because of the false advertising in the media.

Coal power is the cheapest fuel to power the ever growing population with Australian mining industry still putting in billions of dollars into a vast amount of coal projects never the less coal power is a fossil fuel, a fuel which takes hundreds of year to form so the future of coal is undetermined. Coal is a reliable power source but one of the many concern with coal is the mining process used to remove it from the ground. Ecological effects are developing worries for the industry, with the carbon emissions possibly contributing to global warming.

You think banning dogs is going to fix your problem? Well your wrong this will only make it worse the people whose dogs your taking away will go against you. Hears why The dogs are not the real problem . It is deeper than just a breed. Why the owners should take responsibility. why the other side is wrong.

Climate change is a key debate not only in geography but in society as a whole; as the population increases, the depletion of natural resources is increasing at a exponential rate. All the energy that is consumed by our population of more than 7 billion endangers our planet to the point where we are causing irreversible damage. All sources have there on way of providing information which has its own disadvantages and advantages (table I.) and with this variety some may deem to be more successful in addressing the issue.

Imagine your beloved dog was taken from your arms, no laws that protects, no rights in getting them back, but no choice to visit them in a shelter give affection through a fence. This may be the case in a breed specific legislation a ban that targets the Pit Bull terriers deeming the breed as “dangerous or aggressive” they are seen as such that has lead to some states banning the dogs. The breed has always been seen as the “tough” “strong’ type of dog that would be associated with their owners, or in rap videos and even in movies in small scenes as like a guard dog something that called for a intimidating dog for that scene. The ban has many unjustifiable aspects that make up the legislation this has consequences for all involved. Breed specific legislation ban, blames a breed for being unsafe to be in civilized streets, but what the ban does not take into account is that humans shape animals. People play a huge role in shaping a dog's behavior, consequently the breed suffers for this reasoning a do g is not a bad dog in the beginning. How can a whole breed be targeted to a breed specific legislation ban that takes strays to be euthanized, taking owners from their dogs not to be allowed to go home, bringing courts into the matter. Specifically, the legislation using generalization to form a ban that has many unwarranted reasoning for creating a ban like this one is simply false. Having a reprehensible legislation is flawed, because the use of misclassification, including