Should Portland Host The Summer Olympics?

There is an argument as to whether or not the United States should bid to host the Olympic Games. There are many positive and negative reasons as to help decide whether it will be or not be a good idea. Some positive reasons would be improvements in all types of transport, increase potentially in tourism and business activity. Some of the negative aspects would be potential costs and burdens to the community and an increase in costs and taxes. Many people are going back and forth arguing over this topic. The United States should bid to host the Olympic Games.

There are many factors in every country that transform the impact of the Olympic Games, but in general, the economic costs outweigh the benefits, while the social impacts are mostly positive. As such, countries in general should not host the Olympic Games for their own national interest, but they should first understand the impacts of the Olympics in relation to their own country before making a final

The Olympic Games are recognized globally by billions of people. This event is the biggest sporting event not only because it comes once every four years, but also because the world’s best athletes come together to compete for world fame and glory. Hosting the games seems like an honor for most people, however there is numerous risks involved

I think that Calgary should still host the Olympics. The reasons I believe that Calgary should hold the Olympics is because this would first of all give a major financial boost to Calgary because of all spectators that would come from around the world to watch in person and from people around the world getting to see Calgary and making a possible future tourism destination for them. The other reason I think that Calgary should host the Olympics is because Canada, and in specific Calgary seems very divided right now and major events such as the Olympics could be used as a mechanism to unify people regardless of race, gender, religion and other factors. Some pieces of

In 1896, the Olympic Games were officially reborn into the modern era thanks to a Frenchman named Baron Pierre de Coubertin (Lewis, 1992). In 1904, the Games of the III Olympiad arrived in the United States, marking itself as the first Olympics to be held in said country as well as the first hosted outside of Europe. Often forgotten, this specific Olympics also signifies the beginning of the horrible luck Chicago, Illinois, has had regarding the hosting rights. With four losses under its belt and a history of bad news, Chicago is frequently told—to no one’s surprise—that it should simply give up on its dream and focus on improving itself. However, who’s to say that the Jewel of the Midwest can’t do both? By incorporating a well-thought-out narrative of what the city has gone through into their appeal process, Chicago could very well win the bid next time around—whenever that might be. The city boasts an efficiently compact setting; a history and love of sports that entices amiable relations between residents; and an enthralling tale to tell. Overall, Chicago can use its need for a strong community to reach the top of the podium in the rigorous battle for host city status. A point often overlooked, the city technically won the hosting rights once.

There are many reasons that the olympics shouldn’t be hosted in CO. One of these is that it will raise population even more than Colorado already has. It will raise population because of the tourism to go to the olympics from its well known popularity. It will also increase taxes to pay for the construction for the olympics. The olympics will also take away a lot of houses, land, and properties

Are the Olympics beneficial to Cities? The Olympics show people that the greatest sporting event in the world is so much more than just a game. The Olympics give people an opportunity to meet others from different countries despite their cultural, political, and religious differences. Also the Olympics give people the sense of unity and hope. Therefore, by hosting an event like the Olympics, Boston has taken the right decision due to the multiple benefits will occur to the city, the Olympics will contribute to the prosperity of the economy, bring a lot tourist, and shows the beauty of Boston to the world. Therefore, the Olympics should be held in Boston.

The 1984 Los Angeles Games obtain more advantage than disadvantage, so perhaps revisiting this area would be worth examining. Another recommendation is reasonable investment before the Olympics, as far as possible to renovate the old venues to save costs. And host the Olympic Games in a city where have better infrastructure.

In some cases, citizens of the host city are very opposed to certain aspects of facilities that are built to house the Games. For example, in the Sydney Olympics, the citizens held a very hostile attitude toward the construction of the Bondi Beach Volleyball Stadium. They argued that the development of that facility would close off a popular surfing beach for six months causing them an inconvenience. The people of Sydney also thought that putting an arena on this stretch of beach might cause environmental problems (Cashman 6). The recent Rio Olympics especially stirred up some controversy. The developers of these games built a golf course in a natural reserve, evicted hundreds of families to make way for infrastructure, and even built their press center on a slave burial ground (Coston). These actions are all violations of universal ethical and moral principles. As Catholics, we know that it is our job to care for the environment. When the maker’s of the Rio Games, Sydney Game, and any other Games for that matter, build a facility that disrupts a natural reserve or natural habitat of animals, it breaks that teaching. We also know that each and every person is made in God’s image and therefore deserves to be treated with respect and dignity. The people that were evicted from their homes or dug up from their graves to allow development were not given that dignity that they deserve. Along with development, the initial bidding process also brings up ethics issues. When a country enters into the bidding process to try to obtain the rights for hosting the Games, local communities often end up being motivated and run by private business interests. This leads to the interests of the citizens of the city not being properly represented. It also leads to the city spending billions of dollars just to have a chance to host the Games, which they may

He focusses on the economic impact that the games had on Atlanta, and mentions that it would have created more revenue if Atlanta had chosen to not rely on private funds to host the Olympics. Glanton analyzes the mistake Atlanta made by only using private funds to host the games, and mentions that they could have maximized their funding through soliciting state and federal funds in order to upgrade infrastructure in the city. Furthermore, the city could have gotten more out of the money if they had chosen to go the route that Glanton proposed. Since Atlanta’s funding relied solely on private funding, they did get some benefits including upgrades in school facilities, a beautiful baseball stadium, as well as an extraordinary public park that was visited heavily during the games. Overall, Glanton analyzes the benefits of hosting the games in Atlanta, but also offers an input on how the city could have done

I don’t think it’s worthwhile for cities to take on the long-term debt that would come from their financing of expensive sports venues. The book states that a reasonable deal would include a 25-75 split between the public and the private funding. I don’t think it’s reasonable to put that much debt on a city, when as the book states, to “enrich sport franchise that are uniformly owned by millionaires.” I think that the debt that would accumulate from it would be more damaging to the taxpayers, since most are presumably struggling enough to get by as is. A pro for cities giving up the cash would be that new jobs would come about, economic activity from revenue from the games, and it would bring more tourists to the area. But the cons would be

In the past host cities have not been chosen wisely. Many times there are problems going on in the country or other countries having problems with the host city. Dating back to the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin, Germany, this was the first time that there was a significant problem with the host nation that the IOC choose. Right around that time Germany was under control by Adolf Hitler. Also during that time, German Nazis were already establishing Concentration Camps for the Holocaust that occurred 5 years, after the olympic games ended in 1941. It does not make much sense to give a country that has a

Mihalik, B. J. (2000). Host population perceptions of the 1996 Atlanta Olympics: Attendance, support, benefits and liabilities. In J. Allen, R. Harris, L.

Higham (1999) discusses that there are numerous problems, which will be evaluated with hosting an Olympic games such as, development issues, local resident issues, short-term affects, and security issues. In terms of development issues, there is a significant cost dealing with large scale sporting events, and economic benefits are generally received more by big time business interests not the host community. So the host community doesn’t benefit as much as they potentially could by hosting the

Olympic Games, as a global event, any Olympic Games will have a different impact on the environment, society, culture and economy of the host city and country. Especially since the 1980s, with the scale continues to expand, the impact of the Games on the host city and country of more concern. Another important issue will be social communities. For Olympic Games host city, it will has lots of change, like environment, social communities, local economic, etc.… But the host city still got something attractions and cultural staff. For example, Canada Whistler Winter Olympic Games, First, because of economic development, job opportunities increase, leading to increased consumer demand. Second, the Olympic Games will have a great demand for