Should School Sports Stay In Or Out Of Schools

Many people are debating whether or not school sports should be removed due to the critical consequences they are having on young athletes academic, and social lives. Studies have proven that cutting sports from schools can improve students grades in a plethora of ways. Therefore, school sports should be taken away to prevent students from failing classes, save districts money, and allow children the study time they need.

Parents and administrators have been wondering of sports are literally helping, or harming education. Schools have had after-school activities for decades, but this has made too difficult for many students to finish their work. Therefore, sports should be removed to increase the ability to save money, improve grades, and give kids the opportunity to pay more attention in class.

In Ripley’s article she said that when the Superintendent of Premont Independent School District Ernest Singleton canceled school sports the district saved $150,000 that year (11). In her article she states, “Maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year.”(Ripley 11). Because of these high costs schools should use the extra money for upgrading their academic tools. The evidence clearly states that the costs can have a gigantic effect on the school's budget.

Whenever someone goes to a school they are going to see that they have a sports team; however, people do not know how much these activities actually cost. According to author Amanda Ripley in a recent article about sports, she states that a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year (2). “For travel games, schools pay for the busses for teams and also for the band, cheerleaders, and hotels” (Ripley 4). This evidence shows that schools have money but they’re using on sports; instead of using the money on sports they can use it on the education or new technology for the school. Therefore if districts want to save any money they should really consider suspending after school sports.

Any school district knows that there are many costs that go into athletics. In her article, Amanda Ripley reported that simply maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year, she also states that new bleachers can cost half a million dollars (10). In ripley’s article “Should Your School Get Rid Of Sports”, Superintendent Ernest Singleton made a decision to suspend all school activities and recognized his school district could save about $150,000 dollars a year (Ripley 10). In addition school athletics should be removed because it could reduce large amount of money put into the athletic programs. It’s clear that saving money isn’t the only advantage to cutting physical activities it can also help students to focus in their education.

A school in Premont, Texas was threatened to be shut down for its financial problems and academic failures. Additionally, by getting rid of sports schools could save up to 150,000 and sometimes more. Amanda Ripley from scholastic scope says “New bleachers can cost half a million dollars. Maintaining grass field can cost more than 20,000 a year.” furthermore, When teams travel for games schools have to hire substitutes, buses, the band players, cheerleaders, food, hotels, sectrity, painting the lines, and cleaning up. Snacks sold at games rarely if never cover these costs. All these costs can put a financial burden on schools and by getting rid of sports the amount of money schools can safe is

Without sports America's schools would shatter in boredom and stress. Kids feel sports help their health and grades, parents agree with most of them. However schools think sports will cause academic failures. If sports disappear America's students will get stressed and stress results in academic failure. All schools should have sports programs because they relieve stress on kids, they help lots of kids score higher on tests, and they keep kids happy and healthy.

According to Superintendent Ernest Singleton from the Premont Independent School District he realized that if he cancelled all the sports, the districts could be “saving $150,000 in one year” (11). In fact, Ripley announced that new “bleachers can cost half a million dollars” also to “maintain a green field that can cost more than $20,000 a year ” (11). This shows that school sports can be expensive and if they cancelled sports kids can have all their subjects. Clearly, getting rid of sports is important because students need to be able to have all their subjects and should be able to learn more about things in

To begin, school sports should be cut because they have a negative impact on academics. In Premont Independent School District sports were cut to improve grades. After a semester without sports the passing rate increased from 50% to 80%. As well, 100 more people attended the conferences (Amanda Ripley). Cutting sports improved grades greatly and it got more people involved in the school.

The atlantic website qoutes “ Research shows that schools with strong athletic programs have higher test scores and lower dropout rates.”Than in the article “Should schools cut sports”?It states “being a student today is a lot harder than ever. You are being held to tougher academic standards-and so is your school.The stress can get so intense,it feels paralyzing.That's why schools should keep their sports because school sports help improve academics, students have better grades on tests.

Sports progrmas should not be cut out like Premont but they should be greatly reduced or at least run by organizations outside of school, in turn this will improve school focus and performance, along with providing more funding for school programs that contribute to learning. Every so often the news talks about hundreds of schools being shut down in america and this will continue if change doesn't happen, and the change that needs to be done is cutting down on

“What’s in the Name of High School Football,” “Are High School Sports Good for Kids,” and “a video Kids and Sports” all include writing about if school sports are good, harmful to students, or affect education purposes. “What’s in the Name of High School Football” talked about how sports programs took over the school newspaper, morning announcements, and all of the money. Money and fairness were not distributed well between sports and other programs. “Are High School Sports Good for Kids” talked about if sports were hurting some students education and what other people were doing to benefit that. The video talked about how sports were helping the kids that had trouble making friends or just weren’t social at all. All three resources have good facts and opinions about school sports, however, I feel all schools should keep funding school sports. I think this because sports help social life, takes stress off kids, and it gets everyone involved.

For years, students have been playing sports and loving it, but as a result, some peers haven’t been doing well in their academics. Students are too busy playing sports, so they don’t have enough time to do their homework. Therefore, sports should be taken out of school because students will be more focused on their grades, the district won’t have to pay great deals of money, and that America will not lag behind other countries academically.

Everyone goes to high school to pick a program with sports having sports can help kids not be fat to study more of what they want to do in the future .We shouldn't take the programs away from high school .in the second source I think it will help a lot of teens in school. So they can see how hard it really is to work for things they want so they can also be sure if that its really what they want to do if they really wanted to do this teens would try their best to get what they want . Some programs like nursing help you get their faster with all of the hard work the teens work hard for football can also put you in a really good college that would help you more with foot ball . JROTC IS also another program that helps you go to the army .Foot

Oh great. Another bad day at school. Good thing we have basketball practice, today, to ease my mind. This is how some people think about sports. However, some do not think the same. Therefore, middle schools are deciding on whether to keep sports the same way they have been or scale back some on sports. Principals and superintendents should not scale students back on sports because it helps them prosper in many ways.