Should Schools Be Allowed In High School?

School sports are not free they cost thousands of dollars for all the right equipment for the sports alone.In the article it stated that new bleachers can cost half a million dollars and to take care of the grass can cost 20,000 a year.Therefore if schools have no sports,they will save big amounts of money that can be used in a better way.So schools should not have any sports for students, because it is very expensive , and it will save the school money that can be used for academic

Schools should get rid of sports. Although many people think that sports are relaxing and stress relieving; numerous studies say that for sport players in particular, the lack of time to do work and sleep is crushing them socially, physically, and academically. Therefore, districts should get rid of after school sports because the cost is extreme, this would aid students academically, and they are a

Could you be able to not have sports at your school the fun friday night games and the pepper ally before when you get so hyped ? The article “ Should Schools get Rid of Sports” by Amanda Ripley is about sports in schools is a bad thing. The second article “ Sports are more Important than Everything” by Tim O'Shei is about sports are good things in school. School’s that have no sports are good;however,school should have sports. “

Parents and administrators have been wondering of sports are literally helping, or harming education. Schools have had after-school activities for decades, but this has made too difficult for many students to finish their work. Therefore, sports should be removed to increase the ability to save money, improve grades, and give kids the opportunity to pay more attention in class.

As anyone that wants to go to college knows that studying is key. In Amanda Ripley’s Article, she said that ¨The first semester, 80 percent of students passed their classes¨(10). She also stated that only 50 percent of students passed their classes before school sports were canceled (Ripley 11). Canceling school sports helps get students more time to study and focus on getting their work done. If you get involved in school sports, you can lose time to study, so use your time wisely to help you do better.

According to Amanda Ripley ever since premot district got rid of sports 80 percent of students passed their classes compared with the 50% last fall. (2) “About 160 people attended parent teacher-teacher night compared with 6 the year before” (Ripley, 2). This shows that students can get higher and much better grades and students can pass their classes; so instead of keeping the sports and other activities, they should get rid of them so their kids can get higher grades and pass their classes. Therefore if districts want their students to pass their classes they should get rid of sports so they don’t have to practice and train and take up all of their

For many years, schools have been debating whether to keep sports for students or get rid of them. If the schools were to cancel their programs, they would not only save on money for schools and families, they would give other activities a chance, and improve their academic grades. Therefore, school sports should be eliminated to cut costs, give students an opportunity for other activities, and improve students grades.

At the end of a long, stressful day at school, you look out to the field where you will soon be with your friends, enjoying the sun on your skin and working off the stress of your cooped up day at school, with your favorite sport, of course. The article “Should Your School Get Rid of School Sports?” has two very strong point of views. Part one, “Yes! It’s Time to Scale Back” by Amanda Ripley argues that we should get rid of school sports. However, part two, “No! Sports Are More Important Than Ever” by Tim O’Shei argues that we should keep school sports. School sports can be expensive, but there are many more benefits and reasons for having sports at school than getting rid of them.

Any school district knows that there are many costs that go into athletics. In her article, Amanda Ripley reported that simply maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year, she also states that new bleachers can cost half a million dollars (10). In ripley’s article “Should Your School Get Rid Of Sports”, Superintendent Ernest Singleton made a decision to suspend all school activities and recognized his school district could save about $150,000 dollars a year (Ripley 10). In addition school athletics should be removed because it could reduce large amount of money put into the athletic programs. It’s clear that saving money isn’t the only advantage to cutting physical activities it can also help students to focus in their education.

For the past 50 years in America, schools have made it a tradition to play sports in schools. But schools have been crushing the future for their students because they allow sports in schools. While students and parents feel that sports in schools are appropriate and valuable, that is just simply not the case and schools have just gone too far. Schools should eliminate sports programs because sports programs put a financial burden on schools, getting rid of sports will increase in academics and students can get injured when playing sports.

One reason schools should get rid of sports is, they are too expensive. For example, Premont Independent School District, was in trouble, the state threatened to shut the district down for financial problems and academic failures. This shows that the district was paying too much money on sports and not enough on the district itself. Another example is, the district’s elementary school hadn’t had a music teacher in years, and the high school had sealed off the science labs, which were infested with mold,

America has high school sports for many reasons. One sports allows young individuals to practice life lessons, sportsmanship,and allows kids to work on there social skills as well. Sports allow students to practice time management, character building and for many the high school athlete is also one of your higher academic students as well. Now this is not always the case , but for the most part kids who are involved in sports have to be responsible for academics in order to particpate . In the Article " The Case Against High School Sports" I can see why the principle shut down sports in the school. I think having good teachers and being able to fund good teachers has to be a priority. I am not sure what the principle did would work everywhere

According to Superintendent Ernest Singleton from the Premont Independent School District he realized that if he cancelled all the sports, the districts could be “saving $150,000 in one year” (11). In fact, Ripley announced that new “bleachers can cost half a million dollars” also to “maintain a green field that can cost more than $20,000 a year ” (11). This shows that school sports can be expensive and if they cancelled sports kids can have all their subjects. Clearly, getting rid of sports is important because students need to be able to have all their subjects and should be able to learn more about things in

School sports are a pretty huge deal, but now people are starting to debate if they should clear them out. Multiple research has found that articles are saying after school activities should be eliminated to avoid further increasing costs and to use the money for classrooms and supplies. Therefore, academies should get rid of athletic programs to help students focus on their grades, cut costs, and more time on hand for the students.

The article explains that sports dictate when the school day should begin so there is more practice time for teams after school (Ripley 11). A former student from Premont states that “there was all this extra time” and “you never get behind on work” (Ripley 11). This shows that even the students from the high school agreed that with no athletic programs, they had more time to work on assignments. This is a significant change to what schools would be getting if they had school sports.