Should Sexual Education Be Mandatory?

Due to the lack comprehensive sex education, they are left in the dark about how to be properly prepared for a situation that may arise regarding sexual activity and how to protect them against sexually transmitted diseases and unplanned pregnancy. It is a great down fall the lack of education on contraceptives, which only leaves American teens at a greater risk for long-term consequences.

I believe that all schools should teach an inclusive form of sexual education. I believe that teaching abstinence is not working in the slightest because the rate of teenagers who are sexually active is gradually increasing. Since the fact is that teens are participating in sexual intercourse, we need to teach them how to have sex safely. Schools need to teach a form of sexual education that will fully cover how to prevent teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases and infections, because the abstinence-only-until-marriage programs contain inaccuracies and flaws, the popular opinion differs from state policies, and the government and tax payer’s money could be better allocated to a different cause. Ultimately teaching proper sexual education will help to lower the teenage pregnancy

Schools should educate students about their bodies, and how to protect them. “The point of this kind of sex education is to inform teenagers about the possible risks of being sexually active and to educate them about methods of birth control and sexually transmitted infection protection.” Students deserve the basic human right live freely, and if their choice may be, considering about 70% of the national teenage population usually make this decision anyway, to be involved in sexual relations than there needs to be a basic knowledge of safety

Sex education is very important and it should be taught to everyone at an appropriate level during their school to make them aware of everything. At a certain age teenager, will start having sextual relationship and we cannot do anything to stop them so it is better we teach them all the pro and cons of sex. Some teens do not know much at the beginning and then they end up regretting the choices they have made. I think not only in high schools but we should continue to learn about sex education all the time because the more we learn about a topic the

There are a lot of schools nationwide that do not offer a sex education course to early high school students. Schools that do offer the course tend to focus entirely on abstinence. However, the reality of it all is that sexual intercourse is a natural part of life. There are many students that take abstinence-only classes and leave the class with only the knowledge of not taking part in intercourse. Many young students miss out on important information that they should be informed of. All students should take a Sex Education class in their early high school years to protect them and build a responsible mindset.

Comprehensive sex education should be taught in public schools because people need to know about their bodies, how to protect themselves during intercourse, and it is the best way to educate teens about sex.

According to studies, Teens become sexually active before they actually learn about sex. Kids who take Sex Education at a younger age (Junior High) would be less likely to have sex. Sex Ed should be unquestionable.

This has been a debate since the 19th century, some oppose the teachings of sexual education, stating that schools should not infringe on parental and church guidance. Some also argue, that teaching adolescents about sex, encourage children to venture into sexual activity. While not teaching sexual education at all in schools is one argument, the other is, abstinence should be taught to our adolescents. Some believe that the current teaching is " We know you're going to have sex, so here's how to put a condom on." These individuals argue, sexual education should be the teaching of saving yourself for adulthood or

Should sex education be taught to young adults in school? This has been a major controversial topic for many years amongst parents, teachers, and other community members. Their biggest concern is that it teaches students that it is okay to have sex at a young age and think that the program shows them how sexual intercourse is done. Although, this is not the intent of the class, like some may think. They tend to believe that abstinence-only programs should be taught in schools. Allowing sexual education to be taught in public schools and not in an abstinence-only point of view is something that every school should do because it can help them understand the facts about their bodies. “Sex education aims to reduce of potentially negative outcomes from sexual behavior, such as unwanted or unplanned pregnancies and infection with sexually transmitted diseases including HIV.” (AVERT) By teaching sexual education it can help them to understand the emotional values it has by resisting peer pressure and how to recognize it.

In the United States, many teens are uneducated about sex. It has been a very taboo subject due to not being normalized in our society. Sex has been around since the beginning of humans and animals. It is the utmost natural part of life. It's the reason everybody is on the Earth. It should not be kept a secret from students. Comprehensive sex education should be taught in public schools because people need to know about their bodies, how to protect themselves during intercourse, and it is the best way to educate teens about sex.

Introduction Do you think all grades, K-12, should take sex education as a part of their school curriculum?

If schools had sex education classes and made them mandatory then they would actually learn about sex and sexuality like they are suppose to. “Sex education teaches them about their bodies, informs them of the risks of having sex, and teaches them about safe sex” (Blick). Learning about sex in school would be less uncomfortable for the student, because it would feel like a normal class they have to take, instead of a one on one talk with their parents, who makes it worse than it is since they do not know how to talk about it. Letting the school teach about sex and sexuality would take the pressure off of the parents, and they wouldn’t have to struggle thinking of something to tell their child. Sex education in school would be a sure way to be certain that students learn about everything they need to know.

The prevalence of having had sexual intercourse before age 13 years was higher among male (8.3%) than female (3.1%) students(Kann, Laura, Steve Kinchen, and Shari L. Shanklin, et al.). Most schools do not even start the education until around 9th grade when a student is in most cases already over the age of thirteen. Children are starting to have sex at earlier ages so with reason schools need to start educating them at earlier ages. Students who are starting to have sex at such a young age need to know that the biggest risks of having sex at such a young age are unintended pregnancy, human immunodeficiency virus(HIV), and STIs.

Should sex education be taught in schools? There are a lots of debates over this. Many adolescents are having sexual intercourse with insufficient information about sexually transmitted infections. This results in a lot of disastrous consequences in the society and it also affects their future. To overcome this situation, family and society must introduce sex education in the most influential environment for teenagers which is the school. I strongly agree that learning sex education at school helps prevent teenage pregnancy and sexual transmitted diseases, it indeed a need in case of parents' absence, and gives adolescent enough knowledge about their rights against sexual violence.

In my opinion, having sex education being taught in school would not play a very big role in the students’ lives. It all depends on the individual itself. An individual or in this case teenagers should know and be able to analyze whether having sex before marriage is good or bad and is it morally right or wrong.