Should Shakespeare Be Taught In Schools Essay

Pursuing further why Shakespeare should not be taught in school is because Shakespeare is very difficult to understand. “Shakespeare's way with words can be tough for students to grasp”.(DeBlasis) Shakespeare is a lot to comprehend because the way Shakespeare speaks is very different from today's text”.(DeBasis) Shakespeare is very tough to understand now days

William Shakespeare was an English poet and a great playwright. He still has a great impact on our history today. Shakespeare has written many plays, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet. He had very extant works which people could not understand (6). Romeo and Juliet is considered to be one of his more famous plays. His plays were translated into many different languages and styles (6). William Shakespeare was a very talented man who had a great impact on history, during the Renaissance time and still does today.

William Shakespeare is a writer, from a few centuries ago, who has had a major influence on many movies and stories that are made today. His stories and plays may seem a little hard to understand, but once you get passed that, you will literally be hooked onto the story. There's this little debate going on about whether or not William Shakespeare should be taught at school. In my opinion, I think he should be taught at school.

Virtually every school student will study Shakespeare at some point. Most say that he is too hard to understand, too old or too boring. This begs the question: why should students be forced to study an outdated, irrelevant, and unimportant playwright? What does the bard offer school students in 2014? After much research it is found that it is crucial to have Shakespeare within the high school curriculum.

To begin, Shakespeare is not relevant in today’s culture because of the changing times. First, technology has changed how people think, as referenced by Alexandra

Four hundred years have passed since William Shakespeare captured his last play. Yet his style, plots and characters are as alive today as they were when the plays were originally staged during the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. Shakespearean works are a required reading for high school English students and a course or two for college students who study writing or literature. The plays have been performed in almost every language, on stage and screen and at popular festivals around the world. Even in prisons, teachers find that Shakespeare offers modern connections that open pathways to learning for some of societies most downgraded.

But Shakespeare did not write his plays for this purpose, they were not written to be analysed, he wrote his plays for a live audience to be performed and experienced. When a play is simply read, it does not let the reader experience the emotions of a character, unlike a book a play is simply a recollection of dialogue in sequence without the description of feelings. It is like having the script to a movie, but with no set, costume, live characters, and without them what impact does a movie have? It has none and is not even a movie, its not even a book! It is the same with a play with just a script, it is boring and has no life to it. Therefore to teach something like a Shakespearean play, it needs to be experienced as Shakespeare intended it to be, he wanted the audience to react to the characters and feel what they are feeling, which in the case of a play can only be done in a live performance. Therefore in my opinion Shakespeare should not be removed from the curriculum because the subject matter that can be covered in just one play is so vast and varied that to remove it would be to remove a valuable learning experience. However if it is to remain in the curriculum of high schools and university, I

Shakespeare writes in grammar and analogies that were coherent five-hundred years ago, but are not even recognizable in the twentieth century. ¨Since birth and heaven and earth, all three do meet/ In thee at once; which thou at once wouldst lose,¨ (line 120 III iii). Reading Romeo and Juliet will take up an enormous amount of time in class and will not prepare students for the type of literature they will encounter in everyday life. The main purpose of education is to prepare a large population to make the world a better place through a wide variety of jobs, and understanding niche references and word choice in a Shakespearean tale is useless to the better part of a math and science driven population. To derive the most benefit for students from its resources, the education system must drop the unimportant ramblings of Romeo and

William Shakespeare was born April 23rd 1564. Shakespeare was and currently still is an inspiration to so many minds now a day. Never the less should he still be in the classrooms in the 21st century that would be believed to be a negative; Shakespeare no longer belongs to be in the class room of grades 9 to 12. When teachers tell their class that they will be reading Othello, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, etc. nobody is jumping for joy. Most of the children in the class is bored out of their minds nobody understands Shakespeare anymore. Reading the article “Much Ado About Nothing Much” by Peter Beech, has helped further explain this by making excellent points that will help everyone understand that Shakespeare is the problem and not the people

William Shakespeare has been one of the most influential poets in history and has been called the universal philosopher. Shakespeare is still relevant today being that people say that he can be a roadmap to humans. Some people claim that his plays are forced upon students and they will hate Shakespeare. While this may be true for elementary students, ninth-graders benefit by studying about his works since they are capable. William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet should be included in the ninth-grade curriculum throughout the world because of his role of a global figure and his influence on his audiences.

Shakespeare's writing has been taught to most everyone in the modern world. He was a very influential writer who changed our style of writings today in many ways. His tragedies and poems have been read and performed for nearly five hundred years. Shakespeare created an abundance of common words we use everyday such as blanket, and dawn. Who would've known? He also created his own type of writing called Shakespearean sonnets. At most schools, you read several works of his before you graduate, like Romeo and Juliet and Macbeth. High Schools in America should invariably include William Shakespeare in their curriculum at least once a year.

Most English teachers adore Shakespeare, but what about students? Is Shakespeare really relevant to high school curriculum? Shakespeare is not diverse enough for today's students, difficult to understand, and is meant to be seen and heard, not read. Shakespeare was an English playwright, poet, and actor. He was from Stratford-Upon-Avon, United Kingdom and lived from 1564-1616. He wrote 38 plays, poems and sonnets that were translated into 75 languages. Shakespeare should not be taught in a ninth grade curriculum because it is not culturally diverse to represent today’s students, he is difficult to understand and Shakespeare is meant to be seen and heard, not read.

Most of the seniors would not understand the plots, subplots, characters, language, and different meanings behind Shakespeare if it was not for watching the play in class and our mini discussions throughout. All of Shakespeare’s plays happen to be written in old English because of the time period and this probably one reason young college and/or high school students are not interested in reading Shakespeare’s plays. As a student in this college class, I am glad my classmates understand what is going on in this play because I do not. I sit I class everyday confused on what’s happening thought the play. I can’t keep the character, settings, plots, etc. straight inside my head so that is why I sit in class in silence when we have our discussions. When you ask if everyone understands I say I do because I don’t want to look dumb since I am in a college class filled with people smarter than me. Anyways let's get to the point of this response journal.

Shakespeare is considered to be the greatest playwright of all time and even though he died over 500 years ago I still think we should study him. I think that we should study shakespeare's works in school because they are a great learning tool and link to the past. He was a very talented writer and produced many great plays and other works. If we never looked at what Shakespeare did we will lose that part of history that is enlightening and shows us what the world was like in his time period. I think that everyone should read at least some of his works and if you don't study him in a class I have a hard time believing that people would on their own time go and read his plays. Lots of people would say that we don't need to study him and that

To teach, or not to teach, that is the question. Reading Shakespeare in high school has been the norm for students for generations; his works, in fact, are considered classics. In 2018, however, are these creations relevant to pupils in this modern age? The issue with forcing high schoolers to read Shakespeare is that most find the vocabulary difficult to interpret so their time is spent analyzing the text versus reading for enjoyment. Rajat Bhageria, author and graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, expresses, “contemporary novels contain enough complex and meaningful language to be worthwhile, and contain plot lines that students can directly relate to” (Bhageria). People care about things that intrinsically motivate them, and relatable