Should Shakespeare Be Taught In The 9th Grade Curriculum

Shakespeare died 400 years ago. He is the only required author in the 9th grade Common Core. Why is that? Shakespeare is a world-known English, actor, playwright, and writer. He wrote 38 plays, poems, and sonnets. He is being taught in freshman English classes in high schools, and making these freshmen miserable. Shakespeare should not be included in the 9th grade curriculum because it is hard to understand, not relevant, and meant for the theatre and not a

First and foremost, reading Shakespeare’s work leads to a better understanding of the English language. The bard had a vocabulary of over 24,000 words, most of which still exist in modern English. High school students enhance their vocabulary and sentence structure through reading his work. The subconscious use of new words and phrases through reading Shakespeare’s works leads to improved writing and oral skills. The extension of vocabulary is very helpful in post-secondary education; students will have better results with assignments such as presentations, reports, and essays. Not only are Shakespeare’s works useful in becoming familiar with the English language, the themes in his plays are still relevant to society.

Pursuing further why Shakespeare should not be taught in school is because Shakespeare is very difficult to understand. “Shakespeare's way with words can be tough for students to grasp”.(DeBlasis) Shakespeare is a lot to comprehend because the way Shakespeare speaks is very different from today's text”.(DeBasis) Shakespeare is very tough to understand now days

Now and Days, Romeo and Juliet is being taught to ninth graders, but Why exactly do they need to read it? Some people (mostly teachers) think Shakespeare doesn’t need to be taught anymore, they also think Shakespeare isn't a true writer, that his work is fake and isn't actually wrote by Shakespeare. Yet, there is a reason it is still being studied by students, there is a message being ignored that students should learn. Reading Shakespeare shows us a message, a wide variety of vocab, and a different way to think.

Simply stated, students should study Shakespeare's works in school because of the incredible value within them. In addition to exposing students to a multitude of literary techniques, Shakespeare's plays challenge the student with difficult language and style, express a profound knowledge of human behavior and offer insight into the world around us.William Shakespeare is recognized by much of the world as the greatest of all dramatists. The intricate meanings, extensive vocabulary, and powerful imagery contained within his works demonstrate the phenomenal story telling ability of the English playwright. "Shakespeare's use of poetry within his plays to express the deepest levels of human motivation in individual, social and universal

If one was able to look into our classroom, they would see the kids rushing to the whiteboard to try and get a part that they can read. Spots filled, they anxiously wait to continue on with the story. Then that person would ask, “Why would they be so excited to read something so old and outdated?” Well to answer, it’s because Shakespeare’s work is still applicable to our lives today. Shakespeare should stay in the 9th grade curriculum, because it strongly relates to today's day and age, keeps the kids in the class active and paying attention, and helps convey a strong message that everyone should follow.

His work touched an extensive amount of different topics and themes, all of which are still relevant today. His writing is the foundation of some of the most classic literature, and a great amount of modern pieces can be traced back to his style and ideas in some way. His language deepens the analytical, reading and writing skills of young readers, and develops an appreciation for the progression of the English language through time. If Shakespeare were to be terminated from school curriculums, students would lose important, education enhancing aspects of English and would be unable to create a far more in-depth understanding of the literary work of the past and

Where will student be today if it wasn’t for Shakespeare? Student wouldn’t be living the life if it wasn’t for Shakespeare? Shakespeare was a great writer making some of the best plays of his time for example Romeo and Juliet. This is why I believe Shakespeare should be in the 9th grade curriculum, because in the 9th grade people should know about Shakespeare, also some student should know about Shakespeare because is good to know what Shakespeare has done for

William Shakespeare should not be taught in ninth grade because it has lack a of proper english.The language may have been considered proper back then when it was used, but in current society it is not used, therefore is no longer necessary to be taught. Some readers can be confused about what they are saying, which is not good when you are trying to point out important facts about certain things. Critics think that they should change the wording to the so people can understand. If the actors could have change it the english if they wanted to.The use of the old english is unuseful at the point now.

Why shouldn’t Shakespeare be taught in the 9th grade curriculum? Shakespeare lived from 1564-1616. He wrote 38 plays, poems, and sonnets. They are translated into 75 languages. Shakespeare should not be taught in 9th grade curriculum because he's hard to understand,he is outdated and he doesn't relate to students my age .

Walking into any ninth hour class you see eyes flitting towards the clock on the wall, fingers itching to respond to new text messages, and students fighting to keep their attention on the lesson. However this isn’t so much the case when I walk into my ninth hour english classroom during the Shakespeare unit. I see kids enthusiastically pulling out their plays, some avidly listening for their first cue, and others diving into the characters minds and actions. Schools should keep Shakespeare since he is a staple that our students need to experience at least once in their lifetime.

Whether Shakespeare should continue to be taught or left in the past has been up for debate for years now. While some parties argue that Shakespeare's works should not be taught in schools because they are boring and difficult to read, other parties argue back saying that Shakespeare's work can help expand a student's vocabulary and that the storylines of the plays can be immersing. It has been argued that Shakespeare may also be able to help patients with dementia and depression. One party has even argued that Shakespeare's works are the birth of modern art today. There is also the party that claims Shakespeare’s works are what keep the brain excited because it can never predict what's going to happen next. Another party argues the Shakespeare’s

Have you ever read a page of a book in another language and then asked why you do not understand it? That is how must high school students feel while reading Shakespearian texts like “Romeo and Juliet”, “Hamlet”, and “Taming the Shrew”. Some people think that Shakespearian text should be taught in school because of the historic, while others like myself think that Shakespeare should not be taught because in today society, people do not speak in old English and students today do not understand the language use.

Heard of the sayings “Kill with kindness” or “All that glitters is not gold?” All these popular sayings originated from one man, William Shakespeare. Shakespeare is considered the best playwright and author the world has ever seen, his works from over four-hundred years ago still heavily influence the English language. Shakespeare's works are taught in schools worldwide, but some are starting to question whether or not students should be required to read Shakespeare. Shakespeare should be taught to students because of his word choice and his messages that can apply to anyone, even though some may argue that his lessons can only apply to white people since he was white.

William Shakespeare's Relevance Today For as long as formal education has existed in Britain it has been a largely standard assumption that teaching the works of William Shakespeare is relevant and necessary. Perhaps the relevance of his writing is taken for granted, perhaps it is necessary to re-examine the role of Shakespeare for the modern audience. There are indeed many people who question the relevance of this 440 year old playwright to a 21st century audience, taking it even as far as perhaps the greatest heresy of all, questioning the necessity of GCSE pupils learning Shakespeare at all. This “proposed vandalism from the policymakers” (Guardian 09/02/01) is opposed wholesale by supporters