Should Student Athletes Be Paid Essay

Allowing universities to pay students athletes to participate in sports would require a complete overhaul of the NCAA rule book. At this stage, too many questions need to be answered: how much would athletes get paid? Where

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.

NCAA, short for National Collegiate Athletic Association, is a “non-profit” organization which over watch all the athletic related activities on college level. In the early 20th century, President Roosevelt created NCAA because he wanted to insured college athletes from injuries and even deaths. Despite the original purpose of the NCAA is not about money, it has become one of the most lucrative companies in the USA. According to Taylor Branch, “big-time college sports are fully commercialized. Billions of dollars flow through them each year. The NCAA makes money, and enables universities and corporations to make money, from the unpaid labor of young athletes” (Branch). Besides the tremendous fortune these college athletes made for the NCAA, it is also a vital source for university entertainment, enrollment, and money. Although these athletes generate great fortune and put up great shows for society, they do not receive proper pay back. To balance the current unfair compensation system to the athletes, in addition to free tuition, college athletes should be treated as workers in a business market system and paid depending on their own performance.

Kids grow up loving to play sports in their free time. They never get paid to play when they are at a young age. They do it for the love of the game and for the need for competition. This is the way that it is in college right now. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. They don’t get paid a cent. It has been a common debate if that is the right way to do it. Should it be that college athletes do not deserve to get paid for playing a sport? It should not be this way. College athletes certainly should get paid to play.

Waking up before the sunrise is a daily routine. Early morning film sessions, class, then practice, which dominates the day. There are few moments in between for food and socializing, but the life of a student athlete is anything but ordinary. Sleep, eat, practice and school are all an athlete knows, and with the pressures of campus life it becomes even more difficult. No time for much of anything, let alone getting a job. Like most students, these athletes need money, but do not have a spare moment to work. Without any source of income, athletes are put at a major disadvantage. Their full-time job is athletics, in addition to rigorous college-level courses. The possibility of becoming a professional athlete and making millions

Many debates, court cases, and articles have been produced the past couple of years debating whether college student-athletes should be paid. I specifically chose this topic because it pertains to me, and I can relate to both sides of the argument. Being a student-athlete at St. Lawrence University, I can attest to how much time athletes put into their sport and all the hard-work put in on a daily basis. On one hand, I see how the student-athlete deems him/herself as a full-time athlete and spend more time practicing and working out for their team than they do in the classroom, which entails them to some sort of compensation. I can also see the other side of the argument, and how the athlete is either getting paid with a scholarship

"It's time for all sports fans to wake up and realize that the current system benefits only the elite few who continue to perpetuate the myth of amateur athletics." - Brian Frederick. Many people have been debating about wether NCAA athletics should be paid. Coaches and players are wanting to chose this due to the number of career-ending injuries which have left players with nothing. Some people think that if we start paying NCAA athletics, they will chose to go to the school that will pay them the most money instead of picking the schools with the nicest campus or the best education. While this may be true, NCAA athletes should be paid because schools make a lot of money, why not share it with the people who are risking their careers, players are not allowed to have a job, and people think that college sports are simpler and less corrupt.

“The NCAA admits that a "full scholarship" does not cover the basic necessities for a student-athlete”(NCPA). In the playing of college athletics the NCAA bans the paying players for all college sports activities. In the past many colleges have gotten in trouble and have gone on probation for paying their players. College make a lot of money off of endorsements and the selling of merchandise. When a college sells a impactful players jersey or put their picture or name somewhere the college is making money off the jersey or picture and the player is making no money at all. When a college sells a impact players jersey or put their picture or name somewhere the college is making money off the jersey or picture and the player is making no money

Whether or not college athletes should be paid is one of the most discussed debates trending around the world. What do you think about college athletes getting paid? Are universities just taking advantages of these athletes talent without any reward? This debate can go either way, which is why many people are trying to figure out the right solution.

Research Proposal: Why are College Athletes Not Paid? In 1906, President Theodore Roosevelt helped create the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Since then the NCAA has evolved into a billion dollar industry. The tremendous amount of revenue produced from college sports has led some to question whether student athletes should be considered amateurs any longer, and why are they not being paid be for their efforts. For my research, I will use library resources to provide information for my topic.

In America people are paid for virtually anything nowadays; but for some reason we hold our superiorly achieving college athletes to a different moral standard where they showcase their highly profitable talents for free. College athletes such as Ben Simmons and Lonzo Ball, whose names alone bring in sell out crowds everywhere they go, are not paid, yet bring in insurmountable of profit to universities that not otherwise be possible. This begs the question: Do college athletes deserve to be paid for their time, skill, and profit they bring to the universities? College athletes should get paid for their play due to the fact that their job is working for their teams, the university makes enormous amounts of money off of them, and sometimes a

In trying to decide what research topic I wanted to use, I took many ideas into thought. I decided that the one idea that interests me most is whether student athletes should be paid or not. This is very intriguing to me since my master’s program is sports management. In order to do this research there must be many ways to use research as well as ideas from other people. This project is a very big topic in today’s discussion amongst sport fans, college administrators, and student athletes themselves. Media has recently put more pressure on this topic as well with the Northwestern decision to unionize as well as pointing out an athletic director gaining an $18,000 supplement for a wrestler at their school winning a national

People have argued for decades about whether or not colleges and universities should pay students who receive athletic scholarships, and unfortunately, this seems like a discussion that has no easy solution. On the one hand, student-athletes are working a very demanding full-time job that allows few opportunities to socialize and relax, while also going to school full-time. For this reason, some argue that a pay-the-player or a pay-for-play system is a logical and ethical decision that colleges and universities should employ. However, one must consider that most people do not go to colleges and universities hoping to earn a paycheck for their performance along with the added notoriety associated with being a player on one of their college’s

College sports are big business. For many universities, the athletic program serves as a cash-generating machine. Exploited athletes generate millions of dollars for the NCAA and their schools, and never see a dime. In terms of profit, if all ties with the university were eliminated, an athletic program acting as its own separate entity could compete with some fortune 500 companies. So, why do the vital pieces of the machine, the players, fail to receive any compensation for their performance? The answer lies in the money-hungry NCAA and their practice of hoarding all the revenue. College athletes should receive payment for their play to make their college experience more bearable because they create huge profits and