Should Student Athletes Get Paid Essay

They house you, feed you, clothe you, educate you, give you a living stipend, and you get to travel the world. These opportunities are priceless”. Most scholarships to universities provide you with every necessity, if not more, so what else could you possibly need? The athletes obtain their compensation with the benefits they already received from the scholarship, so allowing the players to be paid more than what the scholarship contributes may lead to mismanagement and the students trying to negotiate separate deals with the NCAA.

Whether or not student-athletes should be paid has been a hotly debated topic since the 1900s. College athletes spend just as much time, if not more time, practicing and devoting time and energy to sports as they do academics. For this, many athletes are rewarded with scholarship money. However, many people believe it is not enough. Should we pay student-athletes a slice of the wealth or is a full-ride scholarship enough? (Business Insider). What if the athlete gets injured? Where does the money come out of to support each athlete’s salary? The huge amount of money being generated from college sports has led some people to think that the athletes are entitled to some of that revenue. While, some think that student-athletes should be paid, others disagree for various reasons.

As college sports become more competitive, head injuries are increasing and cause many athletes to be diagnosed with concussions. Concussions are common in football, but many other sports have just as many or higher numbers of concussions (Grasgreen 2). According to the NCAA, they oversee “89 championships in 23 sports each year. There are more than 400,000 student-athletes competing in three divisions at over 1,000 colleges and universities within the NCAA” (Rivera 4).

College athletes being paid to play, good or bad? This would be for the athletes that are going to be competing at the Division 1 level. According to NCAA’s official website a study was done and the stats showed that the highest percent of all athletes that would play D1 was 12.3% which was for lacrosse. The highest percent that the students would go play at the highest level which is Division 1 is .7% which is for volleyball. This is a very small amount of student athletes that get to go n to the next level of play and maybe to the professional league. So it would make sense that the athletes that are able to play at the highest level should be paid to do whatever sport it is that they are playing. People argue that the D1 athletes kinda get paid by the full ride scholarships that they receive. Well the athletes who play in the pros make money so why shouldn’t the players who play at the highest level be paid in the lower bracket of competition.

Many student athletes get scholarships to go to school, so to many people paying them on top of that doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Hartnett argues that $25,000 a semester is not enough because a lot of the time athletes don’t last in school for the whole four years (Hartnett). There are many contributing factors on why a college athlete wouldn’t stay in school for the full four years, “once you get a sport involved, there are politics, injuries, and a call to the office to tell the player, ‘Thanks but we don’t need you on this team anymore’” (Hartnett). Hartnett goes on to say that $25,000 is a lot of money, but it only covers the basics of school, leaving the athlete with barely

“The NCAA admits that a "full scholarship" does not cover the basic necessities for a student-athlete”(NCPA). In the playing of college athletics the NCAA bans the paying players for all college sports activities. In the past many colleges have gotten in trouble and have gone on probation for paying their players. College make a lot of money off of endorsements and the selling of merchandise. When a college sells a impactful players jersey or put their picture or name somewhere the college is making money off the jersey or picture and the player is making no money at all. When a college sells a impact players jersey or put their picture or name somewhere the college is making money off the jersey or picture and the player is making no money

Collegiate athletes should be getting paid for the work they do because of how profitable college sports is to the schools. During the last twenty years, college sports has gained a lot of popularity which has resulted in a large amount of revenue for the NCAA and the schools that they represent. The athletes who perform on the field and court see none of that money. This paper will explain some of the main reasons for college athletes should get paid. College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been successfully operating for years.

The college sports industry makes about $11 billion in yearly income, but not a penny of this goes to the athletes. There are many controversies over paying college athletes; these controversies date back to about the 1900s. More and more people are beginning to voice their opinions on whether to pay college athletes or not; people from former President, Barack Obama, to former collegiate football player, Dr. Phil, have voiced their opinions. College athletes would possibly stay in school longer if they got paid, plus they bring in tons of money to the school or university, and for every game they put their bodies on the line. I believe college athletes should get paid despite them possibly becoming financially irresponsible, already having

First, some say that college athletes should be paid because of the fact that the schools and the NCAA make billions. In an article from USA Today, it stated: “NCAA made more than $1 billion for the year” (Mama). On the other hand, they should not be paid because tons of the athletes get scholarships, they are rewarded with a free education, and they are technically getting around twenty-thousand dollars a year. First, in an article from Scholorshipstats.com in statistics from 2015 regarding the amount of scholarship money that was given out was nearly 2.2 billion dollars.

Can you imagine being a firefighter saving lives, but a college athlete making more money than you? How would that make you feel? People all over the world are saving lives, yet athletes make more than them. Many people have researched this topic on weather college athletes should be paid to play or not. I strongly disagree to college athletes being paid to play.

Many people believe college athletes need to be paid because financially tey are being taken advantage of by the NCAA and school system. These organization are raking in huge profit from merchandise sales, live events of media coverage. Unlike the professional leagues though, the athletes dont get a cut. College teams may not have the same national weight as some professional ones, but they are just avidy followed by thousands of adoring fans. Tons of merchandise jersey, tickets, foods is sold thanks to their performance but despite being the main reason the events are generating revenue the players dont see a dime.

If working to get scholarships you wouldn't have to worry about paying all this, Also getting a scholarship gives you benefits in college. College athletes with full scholarships are given a lot. They are given education, room, board, and coaching worth between $50,000 to $125,000 (Dorfman). Given this would make you want to work to get a scholarship. “They gain publicity from playing college athletics” (Dorfman).

Should College Athletes Be Paid? (Final Revision) College sports are a big part of American culture. I along with many other people watch college sports.

Also, college athletes should not be paid because that is not the purpose for going to college. Many argue that is not he purpose for going to college. Many argue that going to college is not for money but for education (should college...1). They should not be paid because playing a sport is not a job. Students go to college to take classes to later have a career. Also, not all colleges make enough money for all of the athletes to be paid (“Should College...1”). There are a ton of athletes that participate in many sports in college. There are too many athletes at a college for all of them to be paid.

An important topic in the athlete discourse community that was able to show different genres, is the topic of college athletes getting paid. The debate goes on, but with two different genres on the same topic different views will be given and analyzed as well as same views. One of the genres is a video sponsored by ESPN and Recruiting Nations. In the video the Top Ten High School Seniors were asked the question “Should College Athletes be paid?” the title of the video. There are members committed to different colleges that play college football or basketball and there are also students from colleges that are not involved in any extracurricular activities agree, disagree, or even both. It is a major debate, using two different genres in this discourse community the members of this community will give different views of their opinions and ideas on why college athletes should get paid for playing collegiate sports or why they should not get paid playing sports.