Should Students Decide What We Learn Essay

There are 99,000 schools in the U.S., and they are all different in their own way (nsta.org). This can lead to some students getting a better education than others, because of a number of different reasons, like lack of teachers, funding, or the size of the classes. In order to improve as a country there needs to be a more uniform system that challenges students. It will take time to develop the system and implement it in schools, but I feel it will be very helpful in fixing the national education and in improving test

Students dread the time of the year when they stop with their course material and begin to prepare for test. Everyone is in agreement that some type of revolution is needed when it comes to education; eliminating standardized test will aid the reform. The need for standardized testing has proven to be ineffective and outdated; some leading educationalist also believe this because the tests do not measure a student’s true potential. This will save money, stop labeling, and alleviate stress in students and teachers.

these students are not prepared for the real world. These students only learn what they need to

The use of standardized testing to measure students’ knowledge is an inaccurate reflection of their capabilities. By being forced to take a test that does not effectively show their abilities, students become overstressed, and the tests themselves do not promote true academic achievement. Rather than learning about subjects in order to gain knowledge, students simply memorize facts and formulas to get a decent test score. Standardized tests are not an appropriate measure of student performance, only benefit certain groups of students, and do not prepare students for the real world.

I agree with this quote the most even though it was said by one of the most brutal dictators in the world, Josef Stalin. Education is an extremely powerful object that you need to use carefully. In other words supply the student with the correct and fact-based answer rather than an answer that you think is correct.

The Latin phrase “in loco parentis,” directly translates to “in the place of a parent,” and refers to American universities controlling their students’ actions through discriminatory restraints (Lee 2011, 66). During the 1960s, universities and colleges were regulating students’ personal lives through administrative rules and would take disciplinary action, like expulsion, if broken. “From the mid-1800s through the late 1950s”, courts supported universities acting “in loco parentis” in respect to their students (Lee 2011, 66). Higher educational intuitions were not necessary acting how parents would; they were not honoring students for their academic achievements, but rather they were operating through a “hierarchical [structure with] unilateral control” (Lee 2011, 69). The term “in loco parentis” gave colleges and universities the opportunity to control their student bodies, but more specifically, their female students’ conduct. Higher education institutions “acted in loco parentis to teach and enforce respectable womanhood on campus” (Lansley 2004, 66). Before the 1960s, universities and colleges thought it was their duty to teach women “social etiquette, ladylike conduct and proper manners” (Lansley 2004, 62). “In loco parentis” were enforced on the assumption that college students “were children – irresponsible and immature – in need of protection and guidance” (Lansley 2004, 189). These rules “allowed universities to

Could something that is widely believed to be helping students actually be hurting them instead? Standardized tests are these tests are becoming an increasingly popular way of testing students and teachers in the United States. Though it does have its perks like every students being treated the same, and the ability to compare data, standardized tests put too much pressure on students and teachers, are unfair, take valuable time away from learning, and are a terrible way of evaluating and measuring students’ abilities. For these reasons, America should get rid of these pointless and ineffective tests.

All of these test are wearing the students down they are not learning from taking a test there is just to much time spent on testing.With less test we as kids will learn more about the subject they struggle with, and those are just some of the reasons why we need to get rid of some test. If we can reduce the number of test we will still learn but easier.It will be way more simple and we will still be learning the same amount maybe even more. It cant really hurt to try can it?

My job is to hire a sales manager who will sell the latest fiber optics to leading wireless manufacturers of five key companies. Some of the job requirements are that the sales representative must be articulate, sophisticated, and knowledgeable about fiber optics. The job also requires travel Monday through Friday in order for the sales representative to work with those in the prospective company. The job also requires spending leisure time after 5:00 P.M. with prospective clients. I have four prospective employees to choose from. Jake is a Certified Public Accountant who made a career switch to sales. He is single and wants to devote time to his

Students are stressed. But, what is the goal of these tests? Are we trying to make students compete with one another to see who gets the higher score? Or are we preparing them for life outside of school? Maybe at one time these tests were used to measure how well the future leaders of our countries were learning, but now it is no longer like that. These tests seem to show no post-school value except to find the most successful kids and give them scholarships to college. Going along with this, everyone, depending on their grade, is required to take the same exact test. Despite their different ways of thinking, students are grouped together and the ones who are different are “wrong” simply because they were unable to learn it due to the way they were taught. Holding every single student to the same standards avoids the fact that everyone has a different mindset and each person may excel in different subjects. This poses a question: when will the system change? Students are held to such enormous pressure that when they meet the standards, they are convinced they’re stupid, and I struggle with this, too. However, it would be easier if all of the intimidation encountered when we are testing would just be withdrawn and students can be able to take a test, try their best, and if they don’t succeed, they can continue to work hard because, after all, a test shouldn’t determine how

Student retention is a vast issue that has had a lot of publicity over the last several years. There is deliberation over whether or not to retain students who are not performing where they should be. I believe that students should not be retained due to numerous reasons.

Everyone who is above the age of eighteen has a huge decision to make. The decision is who they should vote for. For the democrats they can either vote for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or Senator Bernie Sanders. For the republican side is business man Donald J. Trump, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Marco Rubio, and Governor John Kasich. Each of the candidates are right now caucusing for the American people votes for they can get enough delegates for they win their parties nominations. The American people have a lot thinking to do before they decided who they want vote for. Since these candidates have their own algorithm that they believe will work to help solve the current and future problems that our country has. Also, these candidates have

Not all students learn the same way, therefore why restrict them to only producing their work

The most-to-least prompting procedure is decreasing assistance from the most intrusive, which is physical, to least intrusive, which is gestural, in teaching a student a skill or task. There are three ways to use most-to-least prompting. The first method is the traditional most-to-least procedure. The student is assessed for controlling prompt, which is where that student will start, and then as the student is able to complete the task at the controlling prompt after a certain number of trails, the student fades into the next least intrusive prompt. For example, the controlling prompt may be modeling the skill or task, then once the student has been successful in all four trials, the student may then move down to pictorial prompting. The pattern will continue until the student reaches the least intrusive form of prompting.

     2. Hand out a sample of a nutrition guideline to each student, placing a copy on the overhead projector. Explain what it is the students are looking at, identify important parts of the guideline (i.e. calories, fat and carbohydrates), and discuss what are healthy levels for each. (10 minutes)