Should Students Have Sports Gone Too Far?

Schools should get rid of sports. Although many people think that sports are relaxing and stress relieving; numerous studies say that for sport players in particular, the lack of time to do work and sleep is crushing them socially, physically, and academically. Therefore, districts should get rid of after school sports because the cost is extreme, this would aid students academically, and they are a

Parents and administrators have been wondering of sports are literally helping, or harming education. Schools have had after-school activities for decades, but this has made too difficult for many students to finish their work. Therefore, sports should be removed to increase the ability to save money, improve grades, and give kids the opportunity to pay more attention in class.

After school sports are a big thing in America. Although students cherish these activities; numerous studies have shown that students get better grades if they drop out of sports. Therefore, schools should get rid of after-school sports because they are expensive, students will get better grades, and athletics is a distraction from school work.

At the end of a long, stressful day at school, you look out to the field where you will soon be with your friends, enjoying the sun on your skin and working off the stress of your cooped up day at school, with your favorite sport, of course. The article “Should Your School Get Rid of School Sports?” has two very strong point of views. Part one, “Yes! It’s Time to Scale Back” by Amanda Ripley argues that we should get rid of school sports. However, part two, “No! Sports Are More Important Than Ever” by Tim O’Shei argues that we should keep school sports. School sports can be expensive, but there are many more benefits and reasons for having sports at school than getting rid of them.

In America, sports have an immense impact not only on our culture but, also on our education system. As adolescents begin to engage in school sports they are exposed to the multiple privileges that are associated with being a student athlete. Teachers become more lineate by giving them special accommodations, like a deadline extension or an omission from an assignment because they have a big championship or tournament. As a result of the special treatment throughout their educational careers, many student athletes develop the mentality that they do not have to try as hard academically as their peers. They believe that they can depend solely on their athletic talents to get them into college. Fortunately, for student athletes this is true, because,

Academic excellence doesn’t assure a healthy mind. Although academic excellence fulfills us with a feeling of achievement it might lead students to further mental health problems, whereas sports builds up discipline and a healthier lifestyle. I believe taking sports as early during high school is crucial for the health and further development of students.

School sports are important to many active students lives, but they can be a distraction to their education.For years, studies have shown that students who participate in after school activities receive more failing grades than other students who don't participate in school sports.Therefore, school sports should not stay in tact because students don’t put enough effort into their education by this it decreases their grades, schools spend more time and money on after school activities then important stuff for their and education, and America then lags behind many countries in academics .

For years, scholars have been discussing the idea of removing after school sports for a variety of reasons. Various studies show that students in the United States who play after school sports lack in educational related success. Therefore, schools should shut down all sports programs to save money for academic purposes, allow athletes to focus on school, and help to eliminate sleeping issues that interfere with student’s learning.

For a long time, American schools have debated if they should keep after school sports, or cancel them. According to the article “Should You Get Rid Of Sports” many schools claimed that if a student performs in school athletics you're not going to have as much time to focus on learning which is very crucial to pass school ( Ripley 10). Although sports are good for exercise and giving you joy, school academics are much more crucial to life rather than sports are(11). This is serious because it shows how school sports can easily interfere with school learning and how 80% of students that don’t take school sports pass and 50% that participate in sports pass. Although sports are good for your health, school education is way more useful in life, so for those kids

Many schools have been confronted with the issue of whether or not they should keep sports. Without sports programs, schools will be able to save both time and money that can be better applied to academics. Therefore, by eliminating sports, students will have more time for schoolwork, schools will have more resources for education, and children can get more sleep to stay focused during class.

Most schools consider sports as an essential, which leads students to assume athletics are more important than academics. This being said, many individuals don’t identify sports as the reason why America lags behind other countries academically. Therefore, eliminating school athletic programs could benefit many districts by, saving money, raising academic levels, and providing the opportunity for students to become more involved in other activities.

First off, student athletes have better overall GPA’s than those who don’t play sports. During a 1986 study involving the grades of 24,000 students, out of which the records of 1,500 student athletes and 4,553 students who did not play sports were examined, it was found that the average GPA of student athletes was higher than the average GPAs of non-athletes. While students who did not play sports had an average GPA of 2.12, student athletes GPA average was 2.67(Cooper). This is important because many people believe that sports cause kids to slack off in school, but in reality, the athletics actually sharpen the athletes focus. Student athletes have to keep their grades up to minimum standard so that they are allowed to play, and this serves as motivation for academic success. In addition to having better overall GPA’s, student athletes also have less failing grades. The same study from above also looked at the percentage of failing grades student athletes obtained. During the off-season, 35 percent of all possible F’s were given, but while the season was going on, student athletes only received 23 percent of potential F’s. As you can see, student athletes were doing better academically while participating in their sport than when they were not(Cooper). This also matters because the main focus of school is to learn, and to succeed, and if sports are helping students achieve that, then school sports should be a no brainer. As stated above, at most schools, students can’t be failing any classes if they want to participate in

For a long time now schools and districts have pondered doing away with sports for several reasons. Many institutions have saved a great deal of money by doing away with these activities. Therefore, schools should remove athletics programs to reduce debt, allow children to sleep better, and increase academic performance.

For many years schools have debated on whether they should or should not have after school sports programs. According to people in the US, school sports are a distraction for students. Therefore, schools should eliminate sports to cut costs, gain more time for the students to rest, and allow them to advance in their academic work.

Sports and the general physical activities have been associated with a plethora of benefits. Not so much in correlation with education though. The debate on sports and academic performance relates as to whether sports affect academic performance positively or negatively. Mostly, academics, especially in high school and colleges, require an enormous time commitment. In the same way, sports demand time commitment. Apparently, academics and sports run linearly and either would consume the time of the other. Such would be the argument put forth by the claimants of the negative effects of sports on academic performance. The opponents to the positive correlation of sports and academic performance ground their arguments largely on the time commitment that the two require claiming that sports would consume a student’s time for study hence affecting their academic performance. Proponents of a positive correlation between sports and academic performance summon an extensive range of evidence showing that students who participate in sports perform well in academics. The proponents’ arguments are fetched from the proven benefits of exercise which improve a student’s overall well-being and motivate their academic performance. Opponents would, however, argue that the studies that find athletes and sports persons good at academics do not show how such correlations occur in that other factors could be the actual causes of the correlation and not sports in themselves. Regardless, opponents to the claim that sports affect academic performance positively cannot deny that sports affect the overall well being of any human being. As such, there is no denying that sports affect academic performance positively where a balance among the two is maintained.