Should Students Have To Read Research Paper

It is understood why somebody may think that books should not be banned at schools because by doing this parents are hurting their children by restrain their knowledge. When a quality book is banned, the children lose the opportunity to learn from that book. It is better supported that, some books should be banned from schools because they can introduce students to unacceptable topics and teach them bad or useless

According to the American Library Association, the most common group of people, challenging a book being read in schools, was the parents of the students. Parents have a right to be in charge of what is put into the minds of their students, however just because one parent objects does not mean that the whole school should ban the book from the list. A solution for this book would be to enforce parental consent for books to be read in the classroom. If a parent does not want a book to be read in the classroom, then there should be other options for the student to read. The school and teacher should not trespass on a parent’s rights of raising their child. I believe that if a parent has a concern, they should go and discuss the problem with the teacher so that the teacher will be able to defend their reasoning for choosing the book to be read in the classroom.

Who should choose the books for the class to read, teachers or students? I support the decision to let students pick the reading for next school year. The first reason is that students will be more focused on the book because they like it. Next, students will get good grades because they have actually read it. Lastly, they understand it more because they picked their level.

Parents should have the right to decide what their child reads, but should not have the right to decide what is right for other children to read because not all parents have the same view on what is appropriate for their child to learn in school; as Jones stated, we must all respect each other’s differences. Educators should also be able to freely decide on what they feel is appropriate for their students to read. If a teacher chooses a book that has caused concerns in the past, they should alert the student’s parents of

Teachers can not only choose texts suited to the events that occur in the students’ lives, but they can also choose texts suited to the students’ interests. According

School boards, principals, and teachers have a responsibility for protecting the minds of their students by covering grade and age appropriate material in the classroom. However, does this given responsibility cover the act of banning books from their classrooms? As an advocate for each student, does the teacher not have a duty to introduce the students to a these words issues in order to help the student cope with the different problems in the world? How does a school decide which books should be banned and how much say does the teacher have what should be left up to the teacher? Some say that banning books from the classroom, we prevent them from learning about different controversial topics in a safe and secure environment. In this paper I reflect on my research question: Why do schools ban books in the classroom?

School libraries should not be able to ban books because people should be able to choose what books they read and should have access to them, banning books will draw readers, and because some books can teach students about what might happen in their future. Schools should not be able to ban books because people should be able to choose what they read. In the article Ban a book, draw readers by Colete Bancroft she states “ Every parent should be able to guide their child’s reading.” Also 1 parent should not be able to decide for a whole school of parents on what their kids read.

The fact is, either way, students cannot be forced into reading any book. The same goes the other way around, students should not be denied the right to read a book either. No one is forcing students to read To Kill a Mockingbird, and if a parent feels so strongly against the book, they should be able to discuss the matter with the teacher and receive an alternative piece of literature. “Having the freedom to read and the freedom to choose is one of the best gifts my parents ever gave me” (Blume). When books are banned and censored, not only is the reader being deprived of the text in its original glory, but the author is being denied of their freedom of speech and press.

Banning books has been happening for a very long time within the education system. Parents and other adults are demanding that specific books stay out of the grasp of their innocent children, even high school students. This paper will be covering three reasons why certain books shouldn’t be banned just because parents don’t agree with the material inside the pages. The main points I will cover are, first: knowledge shouldn't be kept from one age group just because some people don’t agree with the subject matter. Second:

But I think otherwise, I believe that students should have the opportunity to read the book. Students should be open to new book to read everyday. They should be able to go find any book and be able to read that book without someone telling them that they can’t. All students should have the opportunity to read any book at anytime during the school year. Their teacher shouldn't tell them that they cannot read the book because the district doesn't want them to. It only wouldn't be fair to the student as for the rest of the school. People have their own opinions and their one person’s opinion could be very powerful. One parent could change the way that their child learns because they don't like the way that they are teacher them. They could go tell the school board and have them change the way that they teach their son or daughter in school. They could change what books that they read or what teacher that they have. All kids should have an equal opportunity to read any book that he or she

There is no hiding the fact, classics can be a challenge to read: however, does that mean we should just forget about them?. A modern teenager wouldn't know one of the most iconic Australian songs “Waltzing Matilda”. For those that do recognize the song would most likely only be able to recite the chores, the remaining verses will be a endless monotone mumble of confusion. Furthermore, not all of Australia's classics are being lost as and enhanced number of children recognize dreamtime stories rather than western culture as they are being taught in primary school. There are many things that can distract students such as technology, technology has changed the world and it is reaching new limits as I write.

This is wrong. Just because something is famous it does not mean it is appropriate for a sophomore class. Things change, just because a story was famous a few years ago it does not mean it is famous now. While in school students should be given books that are interesting and make them like to read, so they begin to love reading to therefore improve their vocab in the long run.

Have you ever wondered why the books you read are always chosen by teachers? Well, I support the decision to let the teacher choose the reading for next school year. First ,students would receive new books that they weren't interested in before. Next, it would increase the students’ increase reading ability and vocabulary. Lastly, it would make it easier for the teacher.

The students in this school should have the freedom to read what they want. " the freedom to read

First teachers aren’t bias towards what he wanna read. Even though there is a slight chance some kids just wanna read but this is still the best choice. So most likely kids choose he book they wanna read the most. So when there book doesn't get chosen they wont be vry happy at all. This supports my assertion because the teacher wont just pick a book because the other teacher chose it. The teacher just wants us to learn. My second evidence is one time ( in 4th grade) we went to the library. The teacher told us to choose the book we want to read as a class an most of us,