Should Students Test Scores Be Paid In Schools?

Schools should get rid of sports. Although many people think that sports are relaxing and stress relieving; numerous studies say that for sport players in particular, the lack of time to do work and sleep is crushing them socially, physically, and academically. Therefore, districts should get rid of after school sports because the cost is extreme, this would aid students academically, and they are a

The impact of preserving sports in high schools has been surrounded by much controversy as people suspect that it is the reason behind the poor academic achievement of students. Opponents to high school sports feel that allowing athletics to be a part of schools sidetracks the focus of the student body, which goes completely against the main purpose of schools. Indeed, this assertion is completely true and based upon plentiful evidence. High school sports undoubtedly come at the expense of student academic achievement since they divert the attention of students away from academics and they come with far too many financial costs, both of which incur negative impacts on the academics within a school. The bottomline is that sports are harming the education of students, so a school must make the decision between composing quality sports teams or providing high level academics; both of these choices simply cannot occur simultaneously.

To many educational institutions, it is controversial whether or not sports are beneficial to scholastic success. Offering athletic programs is said to supply students with an enhanced learning experience, as well as adding amusement to a rather dull school year. Therefore, sports should be provided in all schools to reduce stress, improve academic performance, and develop teamwork skills and equal opportunity in school.

Amanda Ripley argues in her essay “The Case Against High School Sports,” that high school sports should be removed in favor of a higher focus on education. Ripley presents her argument why removing high school sports would help “America’s mediocrity in education” (1). Ripley draws the comparison between the educational capabilities of South Korea and the United States. Ripley presents the story of one Texas high school, an area considered the heart and soul of American football from movies such as “Friday Night Lights.” While Ripley presents multiple arguments against high school sports, there are some other arguments that can still be made, such as the heavy financial burden on our schools and the potential injuries to our students.

Students are the future of our world, as one generation fades away, the next one steps up and keeps the world turning. In our society, schools are the vital place where many children grow, learn, and adapt. High schools offer athletic programs that keep kids active and teach valuable lessons. While sports have their benefits, they often end up undermining academics and have a shockingly large cost. Schools should preserve athletics yet never prioritize it and sacrifice academics, and if sports negatively impact academics, cut them altogether.

Parents and administrators have been wondering of sports are literally helping, or harming education. Schools have had after-school activities for decades, but this has made too difficult for many students to finish their work. Therefore, sports should be removed to increase the ability to save money, improve grades, and give kids the opportunity to pay more attention in class.

Many schools are known for their sports teams, and school spirit. But the question that parents and school officials are stumbling upon is, should school sports be scaled back? The article, ¨Yes! It's Time To Scale Back¨ by Amanda Ripley is about how cutting back on athletics would benefit the students and school community. The opposing article ¨No!

All these issues can be resolved by canceling after school sports. By canceling school sports it would give students more time to focus on their work and the school more money to spend on enhancing their academic experience. While giving students time to enhance their grade terminating after school athletics would help

After school sports are a big thing in America. Although students cherish these activities; numerous studies have shown that students get better grades if they drop out of sports. Therefore, schools should get rid of after-school sports because they are expensive, students will get better grades, and athletics is a distraction from school work.

Any school district knows that there are many costs that go into athletics. In her article, Amanda Ripley reported that simply maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year, she also states that new bleachers can cost half a million dollars (10). In ripley’s article “Should Your School Get Rid Of Sports”, Superintendent Ernest Singleton made a decision to suspend all school activities and recognized his school district could save about $150,000 dollars a year (Ripley 10). In addition school athletics should be removed because it could reduce large amount of money put into the athletic programs. It’s clear that saving money isn’t the only advantage to cutting physical activities it can also help students to focus in their education.

In the article, The Case Against High-School Sports suggests that American schools are putting too much focus on sports than on education. After analyzing the gathered information, I have concluded that sports are being pushed over education in the United States. In this article, I found myself agreeing with many of the points the author was making. The United States is far behind many countries in our educational system; we don’t seem to take education as seriously as we do sports. We also spend an unbelievable amount of our average school funding on athletes, while sometimes spending less than half on each student. Lastly, we have plenty of evidence of schools improving with school sports cuts, but we haven’t been successful in creating a real balance.

Every year district spends thousands of bucks on equipment for kids who want to play when they could be spending ages on homework. According to Superintendent Ernest Singleton from Premont High School he said, “that when they got rid of sports, 80% of the students passed their classes” (Ripley 10). As reported by Superintendent Ernest Singleton from Premont High School he said when they got rid of sports they saved 150,000 dollars per year (Ripley 10). Therefore academy's should be expunged from every single school house because it can lead to saving tons of bucks. This shows that without sports you extricate many things like cash.

In the state of Oklahoma, there have been multiple revenue failures since the beginning of the year and nearly every public school has been forced to deal with mid-year funding cuts. In the face of all this lost revenue, is it a reasonable solution to eliminate athletics as a cost-saving measure? This financial issue is something that not only effects current students, but future students as well. Although there is a lot of disagreement surrounding whether or not colleges should keep athletic programs, both college athletic enthusiasts and advocates for eliminating college athletics can agree on wanting what is best for the colleges and the students, and therefore, keeping athletic programs in college while allocating 50% of their revenue

With society’s ever increasing price tag of education, public schools have gone to great lengths to cut costs from the unessential activities during and after school hours. First it was music programs and art classes; however, with the desperate need for teachers, athletic programs have felt the grunt of this expedition. Now, more than ever, youths in our communities are battling serious problems. Not only are sports and organized athletic programs vital to physical development, but also mental growth and offer children structure and goals. Unfortunately, many schools have to cut back or even eliminate sports/athletic programs due to lack of funding.

According to Superintendent Ernest Singleton from the Premont Independent School District he realized that if he cancelled all the sports, the districts could be “saving $150,000 in one year” (11). In fact, Ripley announced that new “bleachers can cost half a million dollars” also to “maintain a green field that can cost more than $20,000 a year ” (11). This shows that school sports can be expensive and if they cancelled sports kids can have all their subjects. Clearly, getting rid of sports is important because students need to be able to have all their subjects and should be able to learn more about things in