Imagine a teenage boy in his last year of high school being stressed out at school from too much homework and an important test coming in a few weeks. He’s been studying for months and can’t stop from being stressed from the test that will determine his future. He comes home and pulls out his tablet. This screen time allows him to calm himself from the stress at school. Who would deny the teen some time to calm down? I believe that teenagers should not have to limit their screen time because it allows for relaxation, amusement, and socialization.
Screen time is necessary for relaxation because it can calm the teen down from stress at school due to too much homework and not enough time to complete it in. It can also help relax the teen so that
Although adults who didn’t have cell phones and computers when they were growing up think that all of this “screen time” is bad for children it really is not, “screen time” is actually good for kids, phones and computers help the human population communicate faster and more efficiently, the average social media user has more close ties, and the opportunities outweigh the so called “distractions”.
Some may believe that screen addiction, or screen obsession is a concern for teenagers. Depending on the use for the screen time that may or may not be the case. In the article "Teen and Screen Time is a Problem, But More Study Is Needed" by Marc Potenza he states, "Some individuals game to the point of dropping out of school, or isolating themselves from real-world socializing" (Potenza). Although this may sound very disturbing, these cases can be considered extreme and most of the consequences may be mostly video gaming. In contrast, there are other uses for screen time such as educational purposes, or learning new things. Technology is all around us and it is not something that's going away anytime soon. Many kids these days have technology devices, even schools encourage students to further
Even though some researchers may say that screen time is bad for children,while others may not, I have found it to be an excellent choice for newer minds to learn and acelarate their
One reason parents should not put limits and restrictions on their child's screen time is that having restrictions on screen time will just make the screens more appealing than they already are. Having restrictions or time limits on technology will just make the child want to stay up later than usual to sneak onto their screens. This is important because students will get less sleep than they would need to get through the school day. If kids didn’t have restrictions or time limits on their screens, they might be less tempted to be on their screens late at night. The children will be tired all day and want to fall asleep in their classes if they are up all night playing with their devices. Putting restrictions on our screen time makes our screens or technology more interesting and we want to be on them more.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends children under the age of two years have no screen time, with the exception of video chatting. Children younger than two benefit from a hands-on learning approach, therefore, introducing them to a digital device takes away time they need to be socially interactive to develop their cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional skills. By the age of two, and through the preschool aged years it is recommended that children have no more than 1 ½ hours of screen time per week, and that screen time should be monitored to ensure it is educational as well as age appropriate. There are even television channels and computer applications that are dedicated to creating educational, engaging, and enjoyable content for such young viewers, however, it should be noted that
Technology has been part of our daily live more frequently than before. Screen time has been more popularly used on kids and adolescents. On a daily bases many kids seem to spend more time inside on their tablets, instead of having to spend time with other kids. This is a problem that is becoming more popular over the years,on whether kids need to spend that much time on technology or not. Parents either seem to have strict technology usage, or they either don’t. There has always been a huge controversy with experts, who either think that screen time is beneficial or could cause problems later on in life. There are many views towards this topic, from hurting kids brains, to helping them during school, and socially.
eople would argue against limiting screen time for younger children. However some arguments can be made for letting children watch television when they are very young. A poor mouse lost its youth for the effects of overstimulation to be proven, and such a valiant sacrifice should not go in vain. Along with the sacrifice of the mice that served under Dr. Christakis, our future citizens are having their perceptions of reality augmented even before they go to preschool or kindergarten. Combined with the attention deficit, these preconceived notions of different places can lead a school to have some serious issues. The core issue with this is that it is very difficult to moderate a child 's viewing of the television, playing of video games, or accessing of the Internet, especially because younger people have more fluid of electronic devices. The benefits of caring for a child during its infancy, instead of sticking it in front of a screen, outweigh whatever free time would be obtained by letting the child experience over stimulation.
Teens’ screen time should be limited, not by a strict rule enforced by their parents, but by being taught guidelines as to how long and when are the appropriate times to use the devices. In his article, Don’t Limit Your Teen’s Screen Time, Chris Bergman argues that if technology is unrestricted, social events and time without supervision aren’t “an opportunity for… kids to binge on tech because they couldn't otherwise” (1). What Bergman is saying is the more you can not have something, the more you will want it, so by not enforcing strict rules about technology, parents allow their children to take social opportunities as a time to interact with others, rather than a time to sneak in more screen time. Although keeping a lenient rule over one’s
Did you know that screen time is tied with health problems crazy right? Screen time can also lead to higher levels of overweight and it can leads to shorter attention spans, mental problems, or even sadness. Screen time is a distraction to school work and that can be bad for their grades because at school they will be thinking about games and not be paying attention to the teacher or they skip doing their homework which can help understand things they don’t pick up from class. Also it can introduce cyber bullying to kids which is bad and may make them depressed. But the good thing about it is that you can call anyone in case of an emergency or you can call them to see where they are. What I am stating in this paragraph
In the issue of screen time for children, I think it is not as relevant as people make it out to be. While time in front of a screen is a contributing factor, it is only one of many. The real concern should be with content and how children react to that content, and also the level of parental guidance.
Being a father of five children, ranging from ages 4-14 I believe that screen time when used as a educational, creative, and playfull tool, it can help children thrive. Because I have seen the effects in my own home, as well as in school work. The schools now provide many of the children with tablets, and lap tops, for thier educational growth, and develpment. In the home we are seeing all ages playing toether, creating new charecters, and lands.
“National shut down your screen week” should not be hosted by Charlotte High. Less screen time should be a personal goal, and technology is way too useful to give up like that. It shouldn’t be taken for granted.
Would you as a parent, limit your child's amount of screen time or gaming? Some people will argue that screen time for kids is not good for their still developing brains. They say that video games and television will “rot” their brains and that they will grow to be more violent and hostile (Scholastic). Some studies show that this isn't necessarily true. Research shows that people who play video games are actually more outgoing and physically active(McGonigal). Scientists and researchers Sy Mukherjee, Christopher Bergland and Peter Grey, say that with technology and gaming in our kids lives, then they can develop essential learning skills, and strengthen important traits like common sense(McGonigal). The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
We have all been there- the fourth hour of non-stop “screen time,”. Most the washed away hours consists of loosing yourself in another world, or accomplishing a specific operation. But just like fast food, or alcohol, why should “screen time” be limited? After absorbing multiple resources the people have come to the conclusion, “screen time” should not be capped, understanding the ideas of lesson learning, beneficial apps, and social networks, and the fact that this is the twenty first century, should all aid you to the reasons of my beliefs.
I do not agree with the APP’s recommendation of having only two hours of daily entertainment and screen time for kids and teens. I believe that there should at least be 4 - 6 hours of recommended technology use each day. There are multiple reasonings to have a 4 - 6 hours of electronic time. People say that technology increases the way people do things at their schools, jobs, and at home. Technology helps people at school because many schools are now having more technology to help the kids understand. Technology also helps people at home, it helps them complete tasks throughout the house. Electronics help people at work because every day most jobs use computers and they help us complete our jobs. Adolescents can become more educated with a touch of a couple of buttons!