Banning the Burka ( A Discussion)
All around the world, there has been controversy on a particular piece of Muslim headwear, the burka. Today we are asking the question, should the burka be banned in Australia? Many arguments against the burka include security issues and identification problems, whereas there are many arguments for keeping the burka legal such as religion and freedom.
In Australia, less than 1 per cent of Muslims wear the burka. 1 per cent of people have simply made their own personal choice to wear this item of clothing. What people wear should be their own choice. They are not wearing these to ‘hide their identity’, they are not wearing these to make other people feel uncomfortable, they’re wearing them for themselves,
…show more content…
There are also other ways of identifying people. You can use things such as signatures to tell someone’s identity. If people are worried that someone could use the burka for a disguise, and possibly be a threat, there are simple measures that could be taken such as checking peoples IDs or getting their signature.
We live in a country that has freedom of religion. You cannot say there is freedom of religion in Australia, and then take away something people use to practice their religion. Although, technically, the Karan doesn’t say the burka is necessary, it does say that women should be modest, and this is how Muslim women be modest, by wearing the burka. People publicly wear Crosses, hijabs and other forms of displacing their religion, why should we ban this religious artefact?
My personal opinion is that people should be able to wear whatever they want to wear, no matter if it is for religious purposes or not. If you are a Muslim woman and want to wear a burka, go ahead! If you are a guy and want to wear a dress, go for it. As long as it’s not offensive to others, people should be able to dress according to their personal tastes and interests. You should be able to never wear makeup, or wear makeup every day, no matter your religion, personality or gender. This kind of mindset relates to the burka as
Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) like any other organization need funding. Organizations cannot function without financing. They must be funded in some way to continue operation to support employees and practice. ACOs can be funded in two different ways, internally or externally. This means funding is coming from the organization itself or from an outside investment.
Politicians in Quebec have passed a controversial religious neutrality bill which would require people receiving and giving services to expose their faces and could mean that the Muslim niqab or burqa could be banned in public.
The biggest issue with this ban is that it does not impact all religions equally. A person in Buddhism can still live their lives without much of a change, but a person following Islam will have a harder time adapting to these changes, reason being is that Islam has more visible symbols than most other religions. Some examples of of symbols in Islam include Hijabs, Burqas, Chadors and the crescent moon and star. Whereas, in Buddhism for example, you have the Dharma wheel, Buddha, or orange robes if you happen to be a monk. As you can see Islam has more visible symbols since most symbols are clothing or headwear. The clothing that the women in Islam wear are symbols of modesty, you can’t simply wear a smaller Hijab or a smaller Burka. Whereas in Christianity you can wear a cross in a non visible way, in Buddhism you can wear a small Dharma wheel necklace if you
. The wearing of burqa has become contested in European nations for reasons of security and identification but also as a challenge to women's rights from both sides of the fence . Opponents argue that it is from an oppressive patriarchal culture that makes women cover up, though for many Muslim women they feel it is their choice to wear it for religious reasons and stopping them doing so is impacting their rights. Groups both in the West and those that oppose the west have presented ideas about the nature of Muslims to support their cause, this comprising of being highly aggressive, opposed to liberty,unafraid of death being prepared to go to any lengths to achieve their objectives. These ideas mean immigration within the west has become highly contested especially since the recession for economic , social and security reasons, and a fear about immigrants has been created that is not beneficial to moving forward . An article in the Sydney Morning Herald (Australia) polled attitudes towards muslims and found that they were more favourable when groups met and discussed their points of view, they found that it led to a greater understanding and reduced
The outfit we may choose to wear causes certainly, absolutely no harm to others surrounding us. Thus, what may be the point? Why must they enforce it? Therefore, now is our time, as students of Westlake High School, to stand up for what we believe in and declare we be given the right to wear whatever we may please. Under certain circumstance of course, nothing outrageous, or whore-like. And as for males of our society, no pants must expose thou of thy nature below the waist.
As Australia is such a multicultural country, everywhere you turn there is someone from a different background whether it be English, Asian, American or even Middle-Eastern. By being better educated, people would no longer fear what they do not know and do not understand, opening up opportunities around all corners. And in a way, better influencing racial understanding and tolerance. In previous years, Pauline Hanson, from the One Nation political party, renewed her push made in earlier years to ban the burqa in Australian office and business. The burqa is a garment worn by women in many Islamic nations to cover themselves
Women were forced to wear this dress to keep from committing impropriety but if men committed an act of impropriety nothing would be done about it like it would have been done with women. The claim was that the burka kept men from looking at a woman in an inappropriate way. Whereas, in reality it just kept women in the control of their male counterparts.
Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, said earlier this year that the full veil, such as the niqab or the burqa, "hurts the dignity of women and is not acceptable in French society" (Aljazeera). In opposition to the critics' argument, Alveena Malik, a former faith adviser to the last Labour government , believes, Britain needs to take a different direction from others in Europe and to accept the veil as part of a modern British way of life(Ross). She also believes that the religious practice of the Islamic face veil should be a fundamental right. By giving Muslims the fundamental right of practicing their religion, it would give them the right to express their freedom and religion. If Britain decided to deprive the Muslims of their fundamental right like France did, then Britain would be trying to force the Muslims that participate in wearing the Islamic face veil to conform to their society like France as well. The government says that the reason for the ban on the Islamic face veil is because of security and the values or beliefs of the country in which the Muslims reside in. For instance: France says that the ban may cause France to be a target of terrorism. If France is concerned about the security of the citizens and knows that banning the Islamic face veil would cause a potential problem of terrorism, it seems like France would
When I was introduced to the topic of France’s ban on the veil, I disagreed with the law. I took a position based on my customs as an American citizen, which differs completely from those of France. International critics began to argue that France is violating what people call “Freedom of Religion,” which I agreed with at first. As a foreigner from America, I am accustomed to the American government’s definition of freedom of religion. Protected by the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise.” (Religious Freedom). You can express your religion in public, during church, mass, or religious meetings. So the presence of religious items such as the burqa's and veil do not disturb the people or government.
The fact is that any person has the right to dress or speak or anything else in whatever way they want. This is supposed to be a free country. No human being deserves to be treated as if the way they choose to express themselves is a crime.
Since the incident of 9/11 occurred, many people have debated over the Muslim faith and its practices. Muslim extremist groups such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS have affected the name of Islam causing majority of Muslims to be blamed. Recently, a tragic event that occurred in Paris killing over a hundred people left the people of France shaken with fear and anger. These events have lead to an increasing amount of hate and tension towards Muslims all over the world from protests at mosques, where Muslims go to pray, and anti-Muslim rally’s. Islamophobia is a massive issue that has steered European counties like France to enforce laws that ban religious garments that Muslims wear such as the niqab and burqa. Some people perceive these garments to be
It may be argued that western women adopt to culturally appropriate clothing if they were to live or visit a country where that is the practiced culture such as Afghanistan or Iran, then why is it not appropriate in Australia for people to conform to our culture which is to be open and it is respectful for one’s face to be visible. Along with the fact that it is not a core Australian value for the face to be visible at all times, it is also obvious that respect is a two way street. We should show our respect by protecting their right to make decisions and by encouraging assimilation. Whilst the idea of having women’s' identity obscured is offensive to most Australians
Here in the United States, some individuals think that by wearing a hijab you are you enforcing the belief that Muslim women are being forced to wear one despite the reason that some of these women wear it’s a sign of freedom. Therefore, it appears that to some women, the veil is unjust; while other women feel it is not unjust but a decision they made on their own in dedication to their religion. Still, for many women especially the ones in Western countries, they have no choice and for that reason alone, they are being made to wear a
Within the Middle East, the largest population of the men and women are Muslim. The Muslim religion suggests that the women wear a veil or hijab, which is a headscarf that only exposes a woman’s eyes, accompanied by a burqa which is a full body cloak. The sole purpose of the clothing is to cover a woman’s feminine features from men’s eyes. The Qur’an, an Islamic scripture supports, and slightly obligates the uniform by saying that women are to be conservative, “Let them wear their head covering over their bosoms, and not display their ornaments.” (Qur’an). Muslim women, instead of feeling oppressed, view this as a positive aspect in their lives, influenced by their devotion to Allah. Their acceptance could be influenced by their
Currently, the French want to ban the wearing of religious symbols in public schools so that there is no social tension, and to keep the main religion in France (Roman Catholicism) ‘pure’ (Gofen 63). But even though the French say they want to keep their culture pure, in reality since the world wars, religions such as Islam and Judaism have in fact become a part of their culture. Once again, the French let in other cultures knowingly, and once the cultural diversity begins, all the religions are apart of a country’s culture. An example of a religious symbol that the French are considering to ban is the Burka. A Burka is an outfit worn by Muslim females that cover them head to toe. Some, who want to ban the burka say that it is disrespectful to women and can be degrading. But, 64 million people in France are Muslim. By wearing a Burka they are just following their religion and are also following tradition (French). One other big controversy regarding religious symbols is the banning of