Should The Death Penalty Abolish Capital Punishment?

In this paper I will be discussing everything you need to know about the death penalty such as its pros and cons. While the innocent can be killed, the death penalty has its pros because it prevents them from killing again if they are released or have escaped from prison, it helps overpopulated prisons, and it can help victims’ families get justice and closure. Not only can the innocent be killed, but in the past the death penalty was very inhumane. To some its feels right but to others they feel like 2 wrongs don’t make a right. Most people think that the defendant deserves the death penalty, but what does the defendants’ family think?

Good afternoon Madam chairperson and my fellow students. The topic for our debate is “That Australia Should Reintroduce or Legalise the Death Penalty.” We the negative team, do not believe we should reintroduce the death penalty.

In 1984, former NFL player Kermit Alexander lost his mother, sister and two nephews due to a gang related shooting on the wrong family. The Alexander's family was not supposed to be targeted, it was a miss communication between the gang members. Alexander was so full of rage that he prowled the streets at night in search of the members that did this to his family, his goal was to give revenge for what they had done. The only reason he did not become a killer himself was because the mayor Tom Bradley made him promise to let it go and let the law handle the situation from there and in 1986 the killer, Cox was found and sentenced to death. Capital Punishment should be allowed because it stops the killer's from being able to kill again, it provides some closure for the families who have lost a loved one, and it is a deterrent showing what will be done to you if you do these heinous crimes.

So what is capital punishment? It is defined as one person taking the life of another. In America alone there are 36 states that still use the capital punishment and Australia should do significantly more to convince countries like America, Pakistan and China to remove it from their forms of punishment? Although the Australian Government abolished capital punishment in 1967 for reasons such as the risks that come with executions, changes in verdicts and other ways around death like rehabilitation and these are the reasons why no matter what circumstances are present the death penalty will never be the answer. A quote from Mahatma Gandhi - “ Father of India”, political and spiritual leader stays, “ God alone can take life because he alone gives

In this essay I will argue that capital punishment should be abolished in the United States. Capital punishment is a legal process where the state sends individuals, convicted of treason, murder, and terrorism just to name a few, to death row to be punished to their deaths by execution. Also known as the death penalty, these convicted prisoners are then put to death by such methods as a firing squad, gas chamber, electrocution, hanging, or lethal injection. All of which are lethal social injustices.

“The death sentence is a barbaric act . . . It is a reflection of the animal instinct still in human beings.” Said by Nelson Mandela. The death penalty is a very heated topic with strong opinions on both sides. There is a cornucopia of articles and statistics that support both sides. Although it is a more moral and personal option but there were a few facts that truly outweighed the benefits of the death penalty. The death penalty just has so many factors that could cause problems in the prisoner’s death. Although the prisoner may have desired corporal punishment, it does not justify a cruel and unusual death. Nelson Mandela had such a view back in his time that still holds up to this day. I believe the death penalty should be completely banned in the United States because the cost is ineffective, killing is an irreversible act, the methods are inhumane.

The death penalty is a very controversial topic. However, to rid of the punishment is unjust and should not happen, it is reserved for the cruelest of criminals and the most despicable of crimes. It saves the country money and keeps criminals from influencing the

The execution of criminals has been performed by nearly every society to date. The death penalty came to the Americas when European settlers brought the idea of capitol punishment from Britain. The ideology behind taking someone’s life for crimes they have committed is a simple one. If a person commits a hennas crime such as murder or rape, they shall receive the death penalty. In more recent times we now see many countries abolishing the death penalty. The trend suggests that the capitol punishment policies still implemented in the United States may be outdated, but yet there is a large majority in the United States who feel capital punishment is necessary. In contrast there are many that feel that it’s immoral, unconstitutional and should be abolished. The political issue is whether or not capital punishment should be outlawed in the United States. An explanation of capitol punishment and some positions from those who are for and against capital punishment will be given. Next, review the positions of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and interest groups on the issue and how these positions interplay with values of freedom, order, and equality. Then argue as to why capitol punishment should be outlawed.

Desmond Tutu, a social rights activist said, “To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice.” The death penalty does not reduce crime, restore families, or bring justice to the victims. The death penalty has been used as punishment for criminals who have later been exonerated after their execution. Since many death row cases are being reversed, the death penalty should be outlawed as a means for punishment. If the death penalty is outlawed, many innocent lives could be saved and more victims and their families will receive the justice they deserve.

The death penalty has always been a very popular debate and, whether or not, it should be abolished. People have shared their reasons why they are against the death penalty. First, it is very hypocritical. Second, it is always cruel. Third, “prison is hell on earth”. Finally, it teaches

Historically, the death penalty was created to punish a crime, to prevent it from repeating, and to deter further crimes. The United States’ use of the death penalty can be traced back as early as 1608, when early European settlers executed Captain George Kendall for being a spy from Spain (“Part I: History of the Death Penalty”, n.d.). As time progressed the amount of money to sustain such a punishment slowly became a burden to States. As 32 States currently have the death penalty, taxpayers and politicians are becoming aware of the finical burden to continue with the death penalty. The trial and procedures are very lengthy and can require large amounts of money to convict a prisoner beyond a reasonable doubt. The decision to choose this topic came from my opinion of the death penalty and how it benefits the United States which lead me to do further research. While my group focuses on “Should the death penalty be abolished?” this paper will concentrate on the economic aspects of the death penalty by asking, “Is the death penalty cost effective and efficient way of punishment?”

This paper explores five published articles that report on discussion on the very old and yet to answer question of whether the death penalty in the USA should be abolished? The articles, however, vary in their stand on death penalty. In all article it is very different on publisher stand. They discuss thing argument with their own way and vision of thinking. Adina Nicoleta (2011) has raised question for fair trial on the proceeding of the criminal cases. In other article Maestro Marcello (1973) raised a question by what right do men kill other men? This paper have studies of Adina Nicoleta (2011), Maestro Marcello (1973), Reiman, J. H. (1985), Davis, M. (1981), Kim, R. C. C. (1965) argument, discussion and research in relation death penalty, its history and needful of same in today’s world.

This essay explores the ‘death penalty’ and why it no longer exists in the United Kingdom, but does in other countries worldwide, and whether or not it should be reintroduced. Capital punishment is a practice of which criminals, when convicted of a serious crime known as a ‘capital crime’ are executed. Capital punishment was abolished in 1969 in the United Kingdom. The term capital was derived from the Latin word ‘Capitalis’, meaning the head and a ‘capital crime’ was originally punishable by the severing of the head. The death penalty dates as far back as the Ancient Laws of China, where the death penalty was established as a punishment for crimes. Focusing on the United Kingdom, before the death penalty was abolished, crimes such as rape, murder, treason, espionage and arson were considered punishable by death. In today’s day there is no crime worse than murder that can be considered punishable by death. ‘A Life for a Life’ some would say, whereas others would ‘forgive but never forget’. There are concerns that innocent people are getting convicted and later executed only to be found not guilty afterwards. For example there are southern states in America, particularly Texas, that hold the highest death penalty rates making the likelihood of convicting and executing the wrong person at its highest. Although not always used, 58 countries, worldwide, still support capital punishment as a sentence according to Amnesty International’s figures in December 2009, and, since 1985,

Throughout the history of humanity, punishments have been in place for the wrongful acts of citizens within governmental systems of all kinds. In America during the early days of the country, the death penalty was a more viable solution than it appears today due to the quality of the prisons, which couldn’t sustain prisoners long-term. (Von Drehle, 2015). Today, this is not an issue with prisons that are provided both by the state and federal governments and that are fully capable of holding offenders throughout the length of a life sentence (Von Drehle, 2015). However, many will argue that capital punishment should be eliminated. Foes of the death penalty are split into two groups with one that argues that capital punishment should and will cease based upon public support, that it doesn’t deter crime, and the current processes of executions are too costly and problematic. The other will take a more humanitarian approach and claim that it is not the role of the government to decide the fate of an individual, and that crimes punishable by death are not justifiable. Determent, morals, severity of the crime, and revenge are among the many arguments that are geared in favor of protecting a centuries old government system. These groups give more pragmatic reasons as arguments.

The United States is ranked fifth in the world for the highest execution rate. Not only should the death penalty be banned from the United States, but also around the world. Hundreds of crimes are committed daily, but how severe does the crime have to be for an individual to receive the death penalty? The death penalty should be banned because the sentencing will stop the chance of killing an innocent life, stop inhumane actions, and stop the search for documentation or evidence because there is none which states what crimes or the severity of it should be sentenced to death for.