Should The Government Be Regulating What We Eat

The issue of whether the government's regulation of what we eat and drink is fair, this question has started many debates of whether the government should regulate what we eat and drink. On one hand people don't the government to interfere with their lives. On the other hand there are those who say the government should regulate what we and drink . Although arguments on whether the government's regulation of what we eat and drink sounds valid, there are some problems with them. Yes!! Government regulation of what we eat drink is fair>

The most supportive argument why people are in an agreement with the government controlling what we eat is because of all the obese people in the country with medical problems. In fact obesity is one of the many problems

The government should not be able to tell people what kind of food they can and cannot eat. Each person has a personal responsibility for his or her health that they should have control of. This is why the controlling government should not regulate what people choose to eat.

In the two essay talk about obesity in America, one controversial issue has been that fast-food has been causing obesity in America. In “Don’t Blame the Eater”, written by David Zinczenko argues that fast food options in market are the main reason to cause the rates increasing of child obesity because the alternative foods are very expressive, so a large portion of the younger generation choose to eat fast food to instead. Second point David Zinczenko made is that fast food companies are misleading and the nutrition information is not easy to find for consumers. On the other hand, Tadly Balko has different thought to David Zinczenko. In “What You Eat Is Your Business”, written by Radly Balko states that the government shouldn't have any say

In today’s society a huge issue is that we constantly hear about the food industry in America. We often hear in the news that obesity rates have increased, or that Americans have many diseases that contribute to being obese. “What You Eat is Your Business” by Radley Balko expresses that people are at fault for making such unhealthy food choices. Others argue that the food industry is to blame for being so unhealthy. According to David Zinczenko in “Don’t Blame the Eater” he blames the fast food industry as well as the consumer. Zinczenko asks “shouldn’t we know better than to eat two meals a day in fast food restaurant’s?” (392). So, who is to blame for American’s eating so much unhealthy food? Should it be the consumers’ burden or the fast food companies? On one hand, as consumers we continue to purchase foods that we know are making us overweight. On the other hand, fast food companies continue to offer high in calories foods.

Marion Nestle writes, “They make the default choice the healthy choice. Most people choose the default no matter what it is” (Nestle). The issue with this is that “the students having to eat these lunches don’t even like them are just throwing the food away” (Bakst). What the government is providing is satisfying no one and is forcing children to go hungry the whole school day. When kids are just throwing it away it is also a waste of food. The mandates are not helping, but if anything, causing kids that need a good meal to go hungry.

One may agree with the government regulating our food. Personally speaking, it is a good idea. It is a surprise how unhealthy people are when they eat out, they do not count calories and eat whatever they want. Some challenging the government would say calorie labeling has no effect on what we eat. Too many Americans are obese today and it is time to make a change and clean up our eating habits.

Diets have been a issue for the United States for a long time. The U.S. has thought about regulating peoples diets. This would make food healthier and better for you to eat. It would also eliminate junk food sold at stores and restaurants. The government should regulate peoples diets because it will help people be healthier, the food will be good for you, and the obesity rate will go down.

The government should use its authority to restrict the amount of fast food Americans consume to try to minimize the problem with obesity.  Fast food is a major source of the obesity problem that is increasing at an extremely rapid pace in the United States of America.  Right now in the U.S., there are over 50 million adults alone that are obese.  With that alarming number, the government should be stepping in to enforce laws and regulations that prohibits food industry from selling high fat foods.  While the government claims it 's too hard to step in because the foods people eat are a personal choice, it took the government 20 years to respond to health warnings that were issued (Health Affairs, Kersh).  The fact that a medical consensus brought up health warnings, but those warnings were ignored, shows that the government has shown little interest in America 's health problems.  Schlosser states that " {t}he United States now has the highest obesity rate of any industrialized nation in the world (240)."  The government loves to use the slogan about kids being our future, yet a quarter of the kids in America are overweight.  Part of the reason for this is because a lot of schools are getting rid of gym class

Did you know that more than half of adults are overweight or obese? That's more than 121 million people living in the United States. We clearly need aid to help cure one of our country's largest problems. The government should regulate food and drink. This is because people have trouble making healthy decisions, it will help lower the amount of people who are overweight/obese, and because being unhealthy affects others.

What if tomorrow’s news headline read, “U.S. GOVERNMENT BANS THE SALE OF KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS?” How would the country react? According to a study released by the National Center for Health Statistics (2008), “32.7% of American adults were overweight…an additional 34.3% were obese, and that 5.9% were extremely obese” (McGuinness 43). Americans are overweight and obesity is the cause of tens of thousands of preventable deaths in the nation each year (McGuinness 42). The nation is suffering a public health crisis due to overconsumption of nutritionally void food and beverages where “unhealthy eating and sedentary living has become the societal norm” (McGuinness 46). Some believe that the government should intervene by regulating American’s diets; however, others maintain that government intervention would set a dangerous precedent by undermining individual freedoms. Allowing the government to intervene is a slippery slope and could potentially lead to more intrusive actions (“Slippery Slope” 1). Instead of abrogating personal choice the government should re-evaluate the support it gives to institutions that contribute to the obesity epidemic.

One may agree with the government regulating our food. If the government regulate our food, food will be healthier. Fast food will sell less unhealthy food. Restaurants will also sell less unhealthy food. Looking at calories on menus will let people decide what they want to get. By looking for how much calories that something contains. This will most likely make people want to go out and eat because of the healthy foods at fast food and restaurants. This will also bring in more people which means more money.

“WHAT will it take to get Americans to change our eating habits?”(Bittman) Nothing can, if it has not worked yet, nothing will work. Food regulation is a huge topic that has been going around for a couple of years in schools and restaurants. The way food regulation works is that schools are now serving more fruits and vegetables than carbs or meat. There are several people that agree with food regulation in schools and restaurants, but others have different opinions. I believe that food regulation is wrong, I think so because a high schooler needs a certain amount of calories to stay healthy, and some kids do not have parents that will provide food for them when they get home. Another big reason I refute with it also is because there are hundreds

Finally, admittedly some people call that food policy, such as restrictions (portion size, removing candy bars from checkout lines, etc.), taxing a food group or product (soda, snacks, energy drinks) or taxing on some ingredients (sugar, salt, fat, and additives) are bad ideas. They argue that food policies are regressive and “penalize” individuals and families on low incomes. They also feel that food policy would restrict the freedom of people to make their own dietary choices. For example, they grant the government the right to make those choices for people and effectively, it treats adults as children who can neither be trusted to make their own choices or be held responsible for those choices (824). However, these opponents fail to see

Junk food is the leading cause of obesity and other health related complications in America. Programs and advertisements that promote junk food result in more people ignoring healthy foods and opting for the unhealthy foods. Moreover, the popularity of junk food has created economies of scale that has led to junk food being much cheaper compared to healthier food such as fruits and vegetables. Junk food has been associated with several health related conditions such as obesity, heart disease, diabetes and some cancers. By removing vending and soda machines, the state government is intended on promoting better health practices from a young age.