Should The New Ordinance Be Banned?

There are numerous topics among American society that are constantly discussed and debated. These controversial topics range from abortion to the newly elected president. There is one particular issue that has been brought up in the past few months. The dispute is whether or not law enforcement should be allowed to participate in high speed chases. Although there are beneficial effects that come from high speed chases, law enforcement should not be allowed to participate in them because they can be hazardous to society. There are three important reasons why this act should not be allowed: police high speed chases cause a countless number of

The reason behind banning plastic pollution in California was triggered by the fact that disposable plastic bags as well as food containers were filling Oceans with a lot of plastic remains. Additionally, California’s tourism economy has suffered tremendously interfering with the forty

Serving as the number one source of our plastic use, companies opt for plastic containers because it's easy, feasible, and convenient. Food packaging alone makes up for 30-40% of landfills with much of that plastic being carried into the oceans. Going off of this, a new concept that's quickly becoming popular are package free grocery stores. These cost- effective grocery stores have everything you could possible need in bulk form and consumers bring glass or reusable containers, or cloth bags and fill them with the food they need. First popping up in cities like Berlin, Vienna, and Barcelona, many are finding this a more sustainable and eco-friendly option resulting in these sort of grocery stores quickly spreading across the ocean, with the first one in the United States expected to open in Brooklyn, New York. Business operators are extremely optimistic that this could serve a very impactful solution to getting rid of unnecessary plastic. (Che Jenny).

“Bag2bag” program is the most important one among them. Kroger reused more than 1billion pounds of corrugated cardboard in 2007. It resulted in a 14 percent increment over the previous year. In majority of the stores plastic bags, dry-cleaning bags and plastic shrink-wrap can now be reused via Kroger’s recycling program. 9.1 million pounds of plastic recycled from the stores and distribution centers as a result of this program. The grocery bags used in many retail departments contain 25% reused content as a direct consequence of “Bag2bag” program. (Kroger Sustainability Report,

however, there are too many interest groups who can influence on them. So basically, the governor has more control than anybody else in the state. According to the articles plastic bags have been a big disaster to nature impacting on animals, trees and all other kinds of plants. However, the government of Texas tried and is still trying to avoid that by banning the use of plastic bags by making restrictions that would prevent that. According to the article, Governor Abbot is banning the use of plastic bags by making

Answering this question, Adams B. Summers asserts that despite public knowledge, plastic bags are not, in fact, harmful and dangerous and shouldn't be banned. He conveys this through citing facts and research analysis, appealing to audience's logic, and utilizing word choice and vivid language.

The central government appraised this act claiming that it was a conservative measure. This is seen as a matter of self-importance and not a conservative measure. It is an invasion of the free market. However, it claims that the measure would help solve littering issues without thinking of the negative consequences (Charles, 70). They include the need of buying more plastic bags by car owners who mainly use plastic bags as rubbish can linings. Hence, the ban makes the consumers buy additional plastic garbage bags. Also, there is a chance that expenditure on recyclable bags will increase. The state should protect businesses and consumers from the unfair interference on their economic freedom. The general public was not given a chance to air its views on the matter before it was enacted. Hence, most of the decisions should be made by the local governments. The reason is that these officials are more answerable to the

Many of these issues however, can be addressed and even resolved in several ways. Nowadays, a number of countries have begun to impose taxes on plastic bag consumption, with few even banning the use of plastic

As you can see, banning plastic bags have many benefits for not only you, but also the environment. It will save animals, prevent toxins from entering into the air, and encourage people to use reusable bags. Motherjones.com states, “Californians alone throw away 14 billion (plastic bags) a year, creating 123,000 tons of waste and untold amounts of litter.” So, please ban plastic

Even though every type of discrimination can’t be eliminated, there are certain factors that are unavoidable and should be stopped. Discrimination is still something that is common in the U.S. Those with criminal records have a much harder time finding a decent job because companies look at the application and instantly throw it out because of their criminal past. Most companies also don’t have any kind of parental leave for new parents. That leads to them having to making the hard choice of leaving their new born away from their mother. Another option is leaving their job with an unpaid leave that hopefully won’t lead to financial problems. People are constantly being turned away from a job because of race, child care, previous incarceration, and many more things that are unavoidable. New laws need to be implemented to keep up with the changes in today’s society.

The provincial ban states that officials and higher officers were not allowed to marry women who lived in the province where they held office. This primary sources says that a marriage with an official would only be recognized if he left office. Also, the children born would be considered legitimate. Others scholars, such as Ludwig Mitteis, believed that the ban stemmed from the ban of a woman’s presence in a military camp (Phang 2001, 124). Evidence of this ban also derives from the etymologizers Servius and Isidore of Seville. The camps were called chaste because women were rarely present in them (Phang 2001, 125). Despite this statement, shoes, combs, rings, hairpins, and beads are evidence collected by archaeologists that suggests that

The objective of this report is to illustrate the effect of the implementation of a plastic bag tax in Australia. By providing a brief overview of issues, correlated with plastic bag consumption in conjunction with current and proposed changes to policies in Australia. Through the application of economic theory, it can determined whether a tax would decrease consumption and through supporting evidence indicating its efficiency when applied in practice.

As the United States deals with the overwhelming amounts of waste building up, Nitin et al explain that “plastics take anywhere from 15 to 1000 years to biodegrade” once they are discarded (Nitin). Changes in recycling methods can no longer keep up with the exorbitant amount of waste produced in the United States. This is why some states choose to take their initiative one step further by placing either fees or a ban on the use of plastic bags. Due to the enormous waste the United States produces on a daily basis and the negative outcomes of this trash including adverse health effects, harmful impacts on nature, and the exponential piling of trash in landfills, the US government should ban plastic bags.

Picture this: A person goes out to the store to purchase a couple of necesites. Those necesites then get put into a plastic bag as per usual. They get home and take everything out of the bag. They then trash the bag because it is no longer needed. The plastic bag then ends up in some landfill where it is blown away into the middle of the ocean. The plastic bag then goes on to danger the marine animals. Plastic bags should be banned from stores because there are other ways people can carry their things, they are dangerous to marine animals, and cause pollution.

In other words, in this era of high oil prices and energy scarcity, petroleum-based bags are costing considerable natural resources, and ultimately turn them into a huge pile of useless garbage. Actually, significant energies like fuel, from which ethylene gas is obtained and plastic bags are made, are nonrenewable, while human beings are still consuming these precious treasures recklessly. What's more, the plastic bags easily catch wind and blow, causing the difficulty of confining it to where disposed of (Borrud, 2007, p.75). This leads to the difficulty in recycling, which hinders the circulation and reuse of the material to a large extent. Moreover, Ross Mirkarimi, the author of the ban, also notes that the only 1% of the plastic bags in San Francisco is recycled, in spite of the city's perfect local recycling system ("100 Billion Reasons," 2007, p.77). People's poor awareness on energy-saving has brought the oil-shortage crisis one step further. A prohibitory edict on petroleum-based bags might be a right way out before we ultimately realize that the last calorie on the earth comes from our body temperature.