Should The Waste Of Class Time Doing Things?

There’s no denying that technology has grown to play a major role in education and learning. Students are using laptops, tablets, and smartphones to research, complete, and even collaborate on assignments, both in and outside of the classroom. Timothy D. Snyder and Thomas L. Friedman both have written articles expressing their opposing opinions on technology in the classroom. Timothy Snyder is a Professor of History at Yale University who has written five different award-winning books. In his article, “Why Laptops Are Distracting America’s Future Workforce”, Snyder explains to students and teachers why he is against technology in the classroom. Thomas Friedman is a reporter and columnist for The New York Times, author of six award-winning

The article written by Timothy D. Snyder in 2010 titled, “Why Laptops in Class Are Distracting America’s Future Workforce” is a persuasive article. His purpose in writing this article was to persuade professors to ban laptops in the classroom because he feels they are a distraction. Snyder’s arguments against the use of laptops in classrooms are convincing, but he lacks evidence to support his stance and he uses emotionally charge wording to sway the reader.

In defense of laptops in the classroom” Summary/Analysis/Response (SAR) Paper Summary “In defense of laptops in the classroom” written by Rebecca Schuman, talks about the issue of why computers should be allowed in a college classroom. Schuman explains how people of the new generation use computers in classrooms doing almost everything in college now, rather it be taking notes or accessing course material, and it's more affordable for poorer students. Analysis Schuman attempts to use logos, structuring of her article, and has a good purpose to persuade readers of her agreement. Schuman wrote this article “In defense of laptops in the classroom” in order to persuade professors why computers should be allowed in the classroom and how you can combat them if the student isn’t paying attention, plus they are more affordable for poorer students because they’re covered by financial aid. Schuman focuses on this group of audience primarily because some professors do not like computers in their classroom rather it be because the student isn’t paying attention or is using the computer for non-class related things. Schuman attempts to reason the discussion of why computers should be allowed in the class is that it’s completely up to the student whether they use it for good or not. Schuman makes the point early on that she feels that the computer is not faulty, but rather the student who makes the decision on what use to use the computer for. Schuman exemplifies this problem when she

Technology has a huge impact on everyone. Despite the variety of age groups, we have all become dependent on using technology throughout our lives. With the use of smartphones, alarm clocks, headphones, and so forth, we have started to invest tech into our everyday lifestyle, where it is now a social norm. As we are moving rapidly into a tech-based world, the use of technology has been incorporated into classrooms. Teachers have introduced PowerPoints, chatrooms, online assignments and much more to make the classroom run smoothly and help students accomplish more from their learning. However, problems can arise with technology usage in the classroom. Through students being able to access technology, they can become distracted

Which includes less time on my phone texting, or any social media sites. This relates back to Margaret Soltan’s essay “Better Living Through Consciousness: Why You Should Take Your College Education Seriously”, she discusses how technology should be limited to reduce distraction of students. She wrote “Students are gazing at all manner of stuff on their laptops (and in doing so distracting those students trying to pay attention to the front of the room); professors are staring down at their PowerPoint slides and reading the words on them aloud. In some classrooms, professors report that groups of students are gathering in various corners to watch films together on someone’s screen while the professor attempts to lecture”. Many students use technology whether it’s a laptop, cell phone or IPad almost every class period you will find at least one student on a device.

“In defense of laptops in the classroom” written by Rebecca Schuman, talks about the issue of why computers should be allowed in a college classroom. Schuman explains how people of the new generation use computers in classrooms to do almost everything in college now, rather it be taking notes or accessing course material, and its more affordable for poorer students.

Twenty-first century society is constantly presented with exciting advances in hardware and software technology. Use of technology in CCT 109 classrooms should be allowed to capitalize on these advances and challenge the learning status quo. Technology’s adoption encourages rethinking of how information is acquired and processed, how people learn, how they are empowered, what jobs will be in highest demand, and what the nature of learning and useful information is. With the increasing accessibility, affordability, and popularity of laptops and tablets, it is essential for students, professors, and institutions to welcome these devices in the classroom. Technology’s benefits to the professor, student, and society far outweigh any perceived disadvantages.

Nationally 1 in 5 women will be sexually assaulted in college. Most of the time it's by someone the victim knows personally and trusts. A great deal of colleges only have a ¨no means no¨ policy, and while that may work, many people argue that affirmative consent policies allow students to be clear and understanding on consent. Although raising awareness would not prevent predators from sexually assaulting students, universities should still raise awareness on sexual assault, because it teaches students what consent is so they can prevent intoxicated sexual assault, teach students to recognize and stop sexual assault, and teach students to speak up and report sexual assault.

Ellen Granberg and James Witte discuss the positive results achieved by two professors who used laptops in social science classes in “Teaching with Laptops for the First Time: Lessons from a Social Science Classroom.” Granberg and Witte begin by describing how “the development of inexpensive laptop computers along with the growing availability of wireless networking has made it much more feasible to bring this technology to the social science classroom” (51). Initially, Granberg and Witte claim, computers only suited problem-based disciplines such as mathematics. However, they argue that laptops have now become applicable to the social sciences. Next, Granberg and Witte illustrate two experiments with laptops. In the first situation, a professor

Transferring the teaching method from out of the textbook to laptops can be very distracting. Of course all electronic devices come with games or at least some application you can download. The Students will be able to access many apps including; games, email, social media, and instant messaging classmates (Hurst). Even without this change, students are already constantly on their phones texting or playing games during classes. Do we really want to have more distractions?

Students won’t be all excited about technology and spend the whole class playing games or staying up all night messing around on the web. Students will no longer in the honeymoon phase with technology, and they won’t be as obsessed as it seems they can be in high school. Lastly, students will know the consequences of messing around when it comes to technology. Doulos should be teaching students how to handle technology and the consequences of messing around. They should know the difference between free time and work time, and how to manage the two. In college, a professor will not re-concentrate a student who is watching a movie instead of taking notes. In college students are paying to be in class, and most times in a big college, teachers will not care if they are paying attention. They expected students to have learned how to handle technology by this point. Although, how can anyone expect students to be good at this skill if they’ve never learned it. Many say that technology is a distraction to students and results in wasted time. However, High School is the time when students should learn the consequences of not being on task, because in college no one is going to be there to make sure they are doing their work. They need to know the

I do not believe that computers should be banned at park, because some cannot be trusted not to become distracted while trying to listen to lectures or taking notes. Especially for individuals as myself that is a faster at typing allowing me to listen better to the lecture. Whereas when I take notes writing it by hand takes a lot more time which means I am missing pieces of information that could be vital to the class later on. At the same time comes it helps when I don’t understand something to have the whole web right in front of me ready for me to find a better understanding of an idea rather than just being lost waiting for a chance to understand. I assume that in college we can at least be the age or maturity level of an adult that can

Finland is on the top of the best education systems in the world. With shorter days and minimal homework. Where a student can actually spend time outdoors and exploring the world outside of school walls. One of the biggest causes for un-necessary stress on a student is homework. If homework is for practice why not do more work during class to make sure the students understand in class, it’s simply unnecessary to give them extra 5-10 problems. A student should be given time apart from school to focus on themselves and grow as a character instead of spending it doing homework. For school takes up 7 hours of a student’s day plus the time it takes to get home and eat, but on top of that they need to work on the homework their teachers had assigned.

During the last decades, laptops have become standard learning tools in university and college classrooms. Since today’s students’ are high-technology demanding and tech savvy, laptops manufacturers and engineers are constantly thinking of unique ways to design their products. With advanced functions and specifications, laptops can do various activities and educational tasks for students. Also, as technology advances, yesterday’s laptops are less expensive compared to today’s and tomorrow’s which allows every student to afford a laptop. However, educational institutions are concern about whether laptops in class hinder or facilitate students’ learning. Overtime, new technology and devices have been noticed to weaken student performance in

Thousands of websites are distracting students from studying time. In an experiment at Cornell University, students who used internet-connected laptops during a lecture did much worse on a subsequent test than students who did not use the internet (Carr, 2010). It indicated that using the internet in class impacts students’ attention span (2010). Distractions can take attention away from learning. In fact, using the internet does not promote study efficiency, but wastes time.