Should There Be Censored In Presidential Elections Essay

Public trust is at the heart of journalism. Such trust is built upon the credibility journalistic efforts. In the past, though mistakes have been made by even the most reputable of news providers, credibility was maintained and public trust in the journalist industry was steady. However, with the Internet taking its first infant steps into the reporting world, concern is being vocalized that public trust in journalism will be damaged by mavericks, such as Matt Drudge, who, without any foundation in reporting seek to tell the entire world every little secret he can dig up. And he’s been wrong.

Being trusted by millions of people is more than an honor or privilege, but rather it is a power of immense impact. It is a force that shapes the nation, for better or worse. As much good a journalism can create, it also used to deceive the masses and incite unrest. Recently, an article circle Facebook sites. The title was FBI Agent Found Dead in a Murder Suicide. It was published in an apparently-legitimate website. Truth is, it was a fake article published in a website meant to confuse readers. Many similar websites and articles had been created by the author Jestin Coler. At first, his motivations were heroic, trying to highlight the “failed” American government. During the 2016 elections, fake news about the candidates went rampant. Coler had 20 to 25 writers working for him publishing article after article of slander and propaganda for either party. Some of the articles published reached 1.5 million views in just ten days. Coler makes anywhere from $10 thousand to $30 thousand every month from ad revenue of people who visit his fake news sites. Despite his initial good intentions, Coler willingly deceived readers into believing outlandish claims simply because it was published in a “news

For the majority of history, newspapers have reported hard facts. Newspapers were a trusted source that society depended on to form their own opinion. More than ever, today it seems to be more difficult to find facts or truth. Just on that statement two significant and impactful questions are raised. Why is there so much bias and discrepancies between reporting and why is society fine with this? Anyone who pays attention to the reporting that is going on, they would notice the first question, but do not take it a moment to question why the public or themselves allow it. This all ties back to newspapers because they are beginning of this disaster. Although there hundreds of colleges and universities offer reporting degrees, these two questions are the heart of the matter and affecting society negatively.

In a work where news gets thrown in our faces right , left and center , it becomes difficult to filter out which news is true and which is not. But , before asking how to filter out the news , we need to ask ourselves why should we have to categorise the news as credible or non-credible ? Why would the person writing this article wouldn’t want to lie to me ? Many times a journalist may get a story from a source who may or may not be very honest or in some rare cases journalists may make up stories with twisted facts and misquoting individuals. However, in the media business , when someone makes a mistake , there’s always ten others who are waiting to point it out. What makes the media credible, to the everyday reader, is the idea that the

My life often overflows with sources which fight for my attention and acknowledgement. A few include social media, newspapers, and people around me, such as beloved parents, pastors, and close friends. My daily routine is full of information, which inform what the weather will be like, if there is construction on my way to work, or the latest gossip. The most interesting sources are usually unique ones, directing information in an unusual way to intrigue the audience and capture their attention. In particular, one of my favorite sources is Buzzfeed. Their editors narrate news stories in a modern way, constantly finding ways to quickly hook readers. I consider this source to be trustworthy because it has a large platform of listening audience. If a source has a large platform, I consider the information it gives as true because I'm certain a large number of listeners check the source's information and alert the audience if the given data is untrue. Another example of truth in a large audience is the local news stations. They rightfully share truthful information to the best of their abilities, for the good of their listeners and the reputation to the community. Other major news sources such as FOX News and CNN have a reputation to hide vital information from the public and distort information, creating a falsehood.

Raise in media bias is a very common play throughout the whole world to evade people from seeing the truth or another side of an argument. In order to find the truth in journalism an individual must be willing to seek out different reports on television or newspaper. On an article called “Seeking Truth in Journalism” by John Mcmanus he states, “It’s now up to us to construct our own truth filters in the face of a communication revolution that has created profound paradoxes.” Mcmanus has phrased if a person wants to observe if a report is credible of its information it is recommended to be inquisitive and perform a “SMELL” test to check for the value of the given data. With With the help of the test many reports can be scrutinized and found to be unreliable and unhonest. The intelligence of reports can be obtained by another news collector or first hand by the reporter and can have distorted information and turn out to be a fraud. With many news sources worldwide it is easy to acquire different views of a situation and also for newscast to have groups of political view. Cable, mass media, Fox, and many more sources have goals with specific interest so caching details that reveal the opposing interest is very common to happen in the

Rendell, Hart and Hollar have said broadcasting the truth can improve the world, while news that twists or denies realities of our existence can have momentous consequences. We believe this concept and to demonstrate it we have complied 3 major news stories since the year 2000 that have had a major impact on our society both nationally and internationally – and both for better or for worse. These three examples are not meant to be a collection of the most historic stories of the past 12 years; but rather to demonstrate the power the media holds. It’s no secret that journalism is under attack in a myriad of ways; particularly the notion that it deserves to exist as a governmental watchdog. Another river has feed into this

The Internet and social media has become a great way for people to get news, but it has also become a way for rumors, scams, and false political stories to spread. These things have all become classified as ‘fake news.’ Fake news started with the internet, and it has evolved through social media to become a real problem. People are being tricked by fake news into giving up personal information or being led to believe in false rumors about people or politics. Fake news has become such a ubiquitous idea that even the President of the United States has started calling entire news companies ‘fake news.’ This trend of calling entire news outlets fake has made it difficult to understand what is truly made-up news, and what is news that simply stretches the truth for their own benefit or to support a political side. Fake news has become a 21st century threat because of how it can falsely influence people to support one side of an argument.

To understand that most U.S. reporters not only have lost sight of real journalism is to also realize that those same reporters sometimes knowingly hide the truth beneath many lays of non-important information.

News is everywhere. It’s on TV, in newspapers, on phones, and on computers. Some may say that it’s inescapable. Lately, a whole new type of news has begun circulating without much of a second glance. This form of news, referred to as “fake news”, contains fraudulent or misleading information that masquerades itself as real news. While some believe that fake news is easy to discern from real news, that is not the case. Because of this, the circulation of fake news has real and significant political consequences. The most obvious and relevant of these consequences is the election of the forty fifth president of the United States.

The news media functions as an outlet to the outside world and has the ability to shape the public’s knowledge on certain events and their attitudes to toward it. The information an individual seeks to make informed decisions to an extent comes from the news organization. When asked about the choices reporters make when bringing stories to the front, reporters often answer that they just report the facts, they don’t invent them or doctor them. Before Journalists report the facts, they select which facts to report or their network does it for them

There are typically three types of news stories journalists look for: natural events or disasters, a person, group, or organization completing some newsworthy act, and when journalists themselves develop their own story through beat reporting (“News”). Once these stories have been found, it is imperative that journalists report on these events both accurately and objectively. This balance is imperative for journalists to maintain because according to Greenberg and Wheelwright, “a key aspect of journalistic ethics is the management of readers’ expectations” (514). Although the field as a whole has been transforming due to the online news media, considering what is newsworthy for the general public has always been a main concern for journalists. As a result of this transformation, trust in the news media has drastically decreased over the past several years for a variety of reasons, which is why a revival of essential journalistic values, such as honesty and integrity, is needed.

People now a day’s try to cover up the truth about things that are not so desirable, so that’s why the world needs reporters. People are needed that are willing to dig underneath all the lies to find the truth. Luckily, I have been gifted with a moral shovel that helps me sift through the falsities. It’s in reporter’s job description to write a lot and I enjoy writing. A lot of their time is also spent on the internet or in the library researching a topic they will be reporting on. They have

Today’s mass media has been molded by hundreds of years of reporting, journalism, and personal opinions. America’s mainstream media thrives upon stretching the truth and ‘creating’ interesting stories for the public. Tactics like this can be credited to people such as William Randolph Hearst, a newspaper mogul from the late 19th to the 20th centuries. Hearst greatly influenced the practice of American journalism through his wealth, short political career, and use of unorthodox reporting methods such as yellow journalism.

Bat child found in cave! Elvis is alive! Titanic survivors found onboard! These are all examples of headlines you may have seen in a nineties supermarket magazine such as The Weekly World News or The National Enquirer. These classic “fake news” magazines had and still have a cult following Most readers of these magazines enjoy the cheesiness of them and are well aware of their lack of validity. Now fake news appears on our social media outlets. Many of the perpetrators of fake news don’t try to hide it and a quick look at their domain name will be a dead giveaway. However, some individuals would rather disguise their domain to look like a reputable source such as CBS or NPR. Something must be done about this problem, fake news has the potential to shape opinions and control politics. Think of the Edgar Allan Poe quote “believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see”. This statement reigns more true today than ever before. In this world of fake news, it is the responsibility of the reader to separate truth from fiction.