Although some may argue that physical force is the best way to deal with conflict such as a war, it can lead to water contamination, pollution, and perhaps chemical and nuclear fallout. Many day-to-day arguments do not end with a fist fight. The parties involved can communicate with one another to avoid these things. Communicating can also avoid lives being lost.
Dr. King believes that two wrongs do not make a right. He warns African Americans that in their quest for equality, they must not take part in bitterness and hatred. Instead they should look to dignity and discipline. Dr. King speaks strongly against physical violence. He feels that physical force must be matched with soul force. This message of peace that Dr. King delivers, should definitely be focused on. He strongly expresses the fact that physical violence would be easy to fall into
King was fascinated by the idea of refusing to cooperate with an evil system; therefore, King intellectually committed to Gandhi's method of nonviolence. As a social leader, King used his six principles of nonviolence to guide the people that joined him in the fight for racial equality. According to King’s first book, Stride Toward Freedom, the six principles were, “1) Nonviolence is a way of life for courageous people, 2) The Beloved Community is the framework for the future, 3) Attack forces of evil, not persons doing evil, 4) Accept suffering without retaliation for the sake of the cause to achieve the goal, 5) Avoid internal violence of the spirit as well as external physical violence, and 6) The universe is on the side of justice” (Stride Towards Freedom). This quote highlights the knowledge Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had and his talent as a leader. King sufficiently encouraged others to use nonviolence
Violence is not the answer for resolving your problems. Violence can be saved in abounding ways, but they can also end in tragic manners. Violence can cause wounds, injuries, and as well deaths. Consequently, many suffer in pain as you carry the burden of having killed someone.
“The practice of violence, like all action, changes the world, but the most probable change is to a more violent world” (Arendt pg 80). Violence is contagious, like a disease, which will destroy nations and our morals as human beings. Each individual has his or her own definition of violence and when it is acceptable or ethical to use it. Martin Luther King Jr., Walter Benjamin, and Hannah Arendt are among the many that wrote about the different facets of violence, in what cases it is ethical, the role we as individuals play in this violent society and the political aspects behind our violence.
Violence is not always the answer to the world’s problems, but it is a great way bring attention to the cause of the problem. Peaceful negotiations is the only way to ensure that the aggressors and opposition both come to an agreement about the best outcome of their situation. Violence creates hate and hate in turn leads to more violence in the long-run thus continuing humanities cycle of self
Malcolm X and Dr. King faced disunity in violence during the civil rights movement. Dr. King encouraged peaceful protests, and does not see obligation in violence to get a point across. “What is needed is a strategy for change, a tactical program which will bring the Negro into the mainstream of American life as quickly as possible. So far, this has only been offered by the nonviolent movement.” (Nonviolence: The Only Road to Freedom p.g 3) Dr. King says that nobody should use self-defense if assualted during demonstration. That everyone should assume that there is a risk, and it would be contradicting to retaliate during a peaceful movement. “It is as ridiculous for a Negro to raise the question of self-defense in relation to nonviolence as it is for a soldier on the battlefield to say his is not going to take any risks. He is there because he believes that the freedom of his country is worth the risk of his life. The same is true of the nonviolent demonstrator. He sees the misery of his people so clearly that he volunteers to suffer in their behalf and put an end to their plight.” (Nonviolence: The Only Road to Freedom p.g 4) Malcolm’s attitude to violence is that anyone that is taking what belongs to you like your civil rights and freedom is a criminal. It is under your legal right to claim what is
“In the time people will develop enough intelligence to do whatever is necessary to protect themselves “(martin 1). He thinks king theory is not good he wants you to be peace by standing there and doing nothing and Malcolm believed you should protect yourself because if you don’t they think your powerless and worthless. X’s theory helped my claim because it shows how he influenced self-defense. He never want violence he just wanted us to fight back and not sit there like nothing
There are two sides to many things, one could argue that there are two sides to everything. Violence is not excluded from this argument. The two possible sides, or viewpoints, that are a result of violence can easily be seen as extremes of either side. One side could argue that violence is something that is necessary and the other argue that violence is only a tool for destruction. People who insist that violence is necessary in order to move forward view it as a way to sway the outcome to their benefit. For those who see violence as a cowardly tactic to control people, violence is a useless display of power and dominance. Yet violence has also been a way to defend oneself from people who pose a threat. This can lead people who have good
Martin Luther King, Jr. had separate opinions on how to deal with violence. Malcolm Little believed that if someone hits or hurts you, you should hit them back. He thought that when someone reacts violently, people should be violent back. Malcolm protested nonviolently, but when people would hurt them he thought blacks should show no mercy. Malcolm said, “Revolution is bloody, revolution is hostile, revolution knows no compromise, revolution overturns and destroys everything that gets in its way” (Myers 107). Malcolm didn’t care what would happen to the whites. He just wanted blacks to be better than them. When Martin Luther King, Jr. protested he would do it in a non-violent way. Martin did not believe that if someone hits another person, that person should hit back. He wanted all of his fighting and protesting to be non-violent. Martin believed that no matter what whites did, people should never fight back. He wanted to love whites like they are brothers. Both of these men also had separate opinions on what should happen when blacks and whites are
Society has been subjected to many violent acts over the course of its history. Although violence is immoral and wrong, somehow people everyday condone and commit violence for countless reasons. Many Hollywood films glorify mindless violence to their advantage and captivate audiences through its entertaining shock value and rake large box office profits. Car chases, crashes and glorified gladiator sword fights are all familiar scenes in which violence is portrayed in an unrealistic glamorised manner.
Violence is one of the most necessary elements to life. It can be as vital as water, and as regenerating as a long deserved sleep. It is the ultimate balance to the human life. Violence is possibly one of the most perverted and tainted virtues that exists today. Like all values, there is a time and place for them. The hardest part of any virtue is its proper administration.
“Violence is never the answer.” This saying has caused many arguments, there are many people who believe that violence is the right thing to do in every occasion. However violence should not be a thing, violence can never be justified. Humans have gotten to comfortable with violence, we don't even acknowledge murders anymore, we act like it is an everyday thing now because we see violence so frequently.
Violence has affected people a lot ever since the beginning of the world. Innocent people suffer because of other people's actions and decisions. Violence shouldn't be an option for people because it affects others, doesn't solve anything, and can be avoided.
Another leader who was against for violence is Martin Luther Kind Jr. He is one of the influential leaders in American's History. He stated that, "I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth" ("Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King, Jr.]"). He also believes that "we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension" ("Letter from a