Should We Still Be Using Animals As Our Test Subjects?

To begin with, navs.org tells us that humans differ from animals in various ways, animal models will never be able to accurately recapitulate what happens in the human condition. Due to humans differing animals in various ways, the results aren't always effective. Animals being tested on things that humans and animals differ from in basically just killing animals for no reason. Besides, articles.baltimoresun.com states that 90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing were later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials. As a result, 90 percent of the tests done are ineffective and harmful to humans so there’s no point of doing animal tests. You could save thousands of animals by not doing tests on them. Since animal tests aren’t always effective, people should stop doing them and save the

Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures, treatments, and major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, childhood leukemia, brain injuries, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics. Using animals as research subjects is appropriate because they are similar to human beings in many ways.

Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, is the use of animals in research and development projects, usually for the purposes of determining the safety of substances such as food, cosmetics, and drugs. Research animals undergo procedures that can cause physical and psychological distress. Mostly, the animals are euthanized, or killed, after the experiments. However, many organizations such as PETA and the Animal Justice Project have brought up, and are fighting against the dangerous outcomes of animals as they undergo testing. As a result, the topic of animal testing has become a divided and controversial topic among individuals, questioning whether it is ethical and unnecessary or humane and necessary to the science development.

Animal testing should end because its harms the animals, other things can be tested instead of animals, it costs more to test animals, and the results in animals can be different then the results in humans which can be really bad and it can harm humans. It also can cause birth defects to babies who are born and people think it will work on babies because it works on animal babies.

Experimentation of animals may be horrible. But if they do continue the experimentation of animals than that would have evermore excellent results. First, It means that they do not have to test the experiments on themselves. Second, it goes against the laws of science to test it on humans first. And third, It is easier to test and observe the reaction of a mouse or smaller creature than it is to see on a human. And so for these reasons they should continue the experimentation of animals before humans.

It 's on the internet, it 's in magazines, it 's even on the news. Animal testing is a major debate among both academics and everyday people. The most common animals used in testing ae mice, rats, and apes. Some people think that animal testing is obsolete in this day and age but it isn 't obsolete because animal testing helps determine what chemicals are potentially harmful to humans, it helps determine what medicines are potentially safe for human use, and it helps advance other areas of science too, not just medicine.

Animal testing has been a around since 384 BC. “Some testing methods require the animal to; die, be exposed to radiation, remove or expose organs, or subject animals to trauma to create depression and/or anxiety.” (“THE LEADING SOURCE FOR PROS & CONS OF CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES”) Animal tests and human results only coordinate about 5- 25% of the time. Not only is it inhumane, but it isn't even all that reliable. Not to mention, it`s an insufficient waste of government money. Yes it has helped us in vaccine breakthroughs, but there are more easy, less expensive, and more reliable resources.

Animal testing is unnecessary because there are alternative testing methods that are more accurate and less time consuming. For example Microdosing, Artificial human skin, Microfluidic chips and computer models are all humane alternatives to inhumane animal testing. According to www.neavs.org "... skin corrosivity and irritation can be easily measured using three-dimensional human skin equivalent systems such as EpiDerm and SkinEthic." In conclusion, animal testing is unnecessary because it's time consuming, inaccurate and inhumane, yet scientists continue to use it when there are better alternatives to it.

Is animal testing ethically acceptable? Is it acceptable for animals to suffer for the testing of medicine? Although there are alternatives, animal testing is by far the most productive, accurate, and beneficial form of research. Animal testing is necessary for many reasons, including to advance in medicine, to prevent harmful tests on humans, and to establish a solid research background. In this essay, the facts represented will be convincing evidence that animal testing is a necessity for advancement in the medical world.

Every drug, medication, and treatment available at the pharmacy have one thing in common-- animal testing. Over the years there have been life saving results from animal testing. However, the process of testing substances on animals should not be continued. While some believe there is not another alternative to animal testing, it should not continue because it is harmful to the animals and not all test results are positive.

Good morning. The topic of our debate is on whether or not it is ethical for animals to be tested on. Animal testing has led to the discovery of cures, treatments, and it ensures the safety of animals in human products. Animal testing provides benefits to animals as well because it allows humans to know what animals can and can't have. Animals are similar to humans and would react about the same as a human would, so it makes them a reliable testing source. A cure for tuberculosis, which infects two million people each year, uses this process. The test subject animal being guinea pigs. So far, UCLA, a university which uses animals as test subjects, has created a stronger vaccine against tuberculosis than the current one. According to Understanding

Since the early BC’s, many people, scientists, researchers, and companies have been forcing live animals to be used to test their products on, to study behavior effects, etc. However, in today’s times, people are questioning whether or not animal testing should even be allowed. This query of whether or not to allow animal testing or not is essentially related to how humane it is, and how well it works. As a result, this matter is an extremely contentious one and has allured a lot of discussion. This essay will examine a couple of the discussions on why animal testing is not alright for companies to do, and will profile any of the problems along this situation. It will then state the reasons I think animal testing should be legal, which would be, we eat more than we test, animals have a shorter life cycle than humans, and animal research has helped scientists develop modern vaccines.

Whether animal experimentation is justified or not has been undecided for many decades. Many years back, the debate was carried out by animal rights groups which were led by the Cambridge University to get rid of its plan for a primate research in 2004. Since this debate, many supporters have become more confident in speaking out what they believe and getting their points across to people.

The first reason animal testing data is unreliable is because animals in these labs have stress, and the stress that is created can negatively affect the reliability of the research data received from the animal. This stress can increase the heart rate, pulse, blood pressure, muscular

Every year millions of animals are tested for research or experiments and end up dying in the process or are put to death after the tests. Animals like cats, dogs, rabbits, mice, monkeys and more. These animals are treated as test subjects so scientists can see if certain products are safe for humans to use. Scientists test many things on these animals from chemicals to make up products. They also use the animals to practice medical procedures on and they inject drugs into the animals to find out what sort of reaction they might have resulting in pain and even death to the animals. Which is unnecessary, because humans and animals are biologically different so the experiments aren’t really accurate and there are alternative methods that don’t require animal testing. Animal testing should be banned, because millions of animals suffer and even die every year in an inhumane way, there are alternative testing methods and laws like the Animal Welfare Act are not supportive enough.