Should We Support Darwin's Theory Of Evolution?

The second reason why evolution is false is that there is little evidence of transitional fossils in the fossil record. Even Darwin and other scientists have admitted the lack of evidence and fossils. For example, Stephen M. Stanley, an evolutionist, has made comments about this: “In fact, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another” (Snyder, 44 Reasons Why Evolution Is Just A Fairy Tale For Adults). If evolution has happened, and is still in process today, then the world would be filled with species that are transitioning into another, instead, there are none alive today. To add to this, no human has ever witnessed macroevolution, so therefore, there is little proof and no possible record

The theory of evolution, as set forth by Charles Darwin in 1859, stated that all plant and animal life evolved over long periods of time from simple to more complicated forms through mutation and adaptation. He also taught that only the fittest of each species would survive. He further postulated that the first living cell evolved in a "warm warm little pond" and that it took billions of years for the present diversity of living things to evolve. At the time, it was thought that the few "missing links" in the fossil record would be soon filled.(Darwin, 1927 ). Today, however, there is today a considerable body of scientific evidence that refutes this entire theory.

There is proof of this evolution all around us. Man itself has evolved over thousands and thousands of years in direct relation to the changing environment surrounding them. There are facts and proof to back up the theory of evolution, but that does not mean that it is the only way that explains development of living things.

For more than 150 years, a revolutionary idea has been spreading all over the world. It helped us discover our origins and revealed our place in nature. It led to the unification of once independent fields of scientific inquiry. And it is being used today to tackle some of the most pressing problems facing modern civilization. But its implications go far beyond science. It has shaped our culture, politics, philosophy and religion, and it has been used to justify war and genocide. That idea is Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection.

This tough old man-of-a-town is cradled in a stark and isolated depression between the Argus and Coso mountain ranges in eastern California. On first glance, it seems to be barely breathing. Some say it is just another desert ghost town waiting to happen, but don’t even think about saying that to one of the 40 or so residents.

Dawkins proponent of Darwinism, claims that the world appears to be as if the world had a designer. He states that many Americans believe this illusion. Dawkin argues that when people see something that appears to be design they think it is evidence for design. He asserts that is the error creationist make. He argues that highly improbable thing exist in the world. He argues that people don’t understand such nonrandom cumulative ratcheting. They think natural selection is a theory of chance. He refutes the argument that there are gaps in fossil record indicating a gap in Darwinian account, stating such reasoning is no science. He claims some animals just don’t fossilize. He admits there are other hardships to accepting Darwinism such as the

Charles Darwin, born in Shrewsbury, England, was known for his studies around the world that led to the discovery of evolution. His views on “natural selection” were very broad and justified. He is known as a naturalist and the world to form biological change. Natural selection is when living organisms adapt to the environment they live in to try and live longer.

(What is Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, 2015) He thought that over time, species would change and adapt in accordance with their environment, allowing for better chances of survival and reproduction. Darwin also believed that all species shared a common ancestor. (History of Evolutionary Thought, 2017) These theories are still an ongoing debate in our world today and many people don’t believe in evolution. People like Charles Darwin have opened up a doorway for us to piece the earth’s mysterious history together in a way that allows us to get a glimpse of why evolution is true. Much more evidence has been gathered over time and still, some people refuse to accept the fact that evolution is real. They are attached to the simple concepts and statements they have heard over the years that make evolution sound ignorant. I will attempt to go through a plethora of evidence that shows that evolution is not ignorant, but an amazing understanding of how life on earth came to be.

Following the statement of Paul Davies was the announcement of Stephen Gould, another evolutionist. Earlier in the video, Dr. Mortenson places a significant burden on the evolutionary tree. He then proposes the question of, is there any fossil evidence, supporting the evolutionary tree. In regards to the truth of the tree, Gould declared evolutionist only have enough information and evidence to support the tips of the tree. Still scientist will argue, they possess evidence to prove evolution. But Mortenson provides us with sufficient evidence and countless assertions of evolutionary scientist testify, the fossils scientists have discovered almost identically match their common day ancestors. So the question is clear, how much tangible evidence does evolutionist have? The answer is none! Scientists have no concrete physical evidence to support their claim that evolution is fact. Contrary to that, evolution has fashioned countless physical examples and made numerous assumptions; all of which has been proven to be false. In the end, this supplies us with a crystal clear truth of evolution, and leaves us without any doubt evolution is absolutely

There is a monkey in your family tree. Whether that is fact or theory, and the difference, Stephen Jay Gould explains in, “Evolution as Fact and Theory”, which appeared in the May 1981 issue of Discover Magazine. Mr. Gould was described by the New York Times as, “one of the most influential evolutionary biologists of the 20th century” (Yoon). He wants to show how the creationist's have built their argument against evolution on sand, and the evolutionist’s argument built on solid rock, as any paleontologist would prefer. It is a war of words, where their meaning, use and misuse, determine on which side you stand. His argument is not perfect, but using lack of perfection as evidence of evolution, he makes the case quite convincingly.

Remember that old book called …… what was it again? Oh, yeah, the Bible; well it was right. Evolution is not correct, and I have God and science to back me up. Proof in finding this information is in abundance for both believers and non-believers in God. Now days, anything is possible.

They say that carbon dating is not accurate, even though it is accurate up to 100,000 years. For that reason, scientists use more than carbon dating for rock formations and fossils. Some also claim that fossils do not show change. In fact, that is exactly what fossils do. You can find fossils from different times of the same species, and it will show how it has progressed through the decades. Fossils are the pieces that connect the past to the present. Non-believers have even said how can something survive when it is in the process of evolving. They have asked how can a bird survive with only half a wing. The answer is very simple really. They are still surviving. Some birds developed the full wing, but others such as penguins and ostriches are still surviving with half a wing. The people also tend to claim that evolution is still controversial when in reality it is not. About 97% of the scientific community believes in evolution and roughly 100% believe in the biological field. In some places the theory of evolution is just as accepted as the fact that the earth is round not

Before Charles Darwin had published his book over his theory of evolution in 1859, it was thought that the Earth did not change, and that all of the animals that were on the Earth would remain there until the end of time, and that no new species would be added, as well as none would go extinct. However, after Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution was published, it was actually accepted by the science community in less than a year. His book countered the previously thought idea due to findings of animal fossils that no longer resided on the Earth. This proved that animals did in fact go extinct, and that the Earth did actually change.

Creationists, mistaking the uncertain in science for the unscientific, see the debate among evolutionists regarding how best to explain evolution as a sign of weakness. Scientists, on the other hand, see uncertainty as simply an inevitable element of scientific knowledge. They regard debates on fundamental theoretical issues as healthy and stimulating. Science, says evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould, is "most fun when it plays with interesting ideas, examines their implications, and recognizes that old information may be explained in surprisingly new ways." Thus, through all the debate over evolutionary mechanisms biologists have not been led to doubt that evolution has occurred. "We are debating how it happened," says Gould (1983, p.256).

Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is a theory that is and has been widely accepted for many years. The reason for this widespread acceptance is the many strengths that Darwin’s theory has. However, even though this is true, Darwin's theory has a few weaknesses. Darwin, although close, did not paint a full realistic picture of evolution with his theory.